Trump's hint at an Iran breakthrough could influence diplomatic dynamics, but market volatility reflects uncertainty without concrete actions.
The post Trump hints at potential Iran breakthrough amid South Lebanon tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The blockade exacerbates diplomatic tensions, reducing chances for a uranium deal and highlighting geopolitical instability in the region.
The post US blockade hinders Iran’s business, impacting uranium enrichment talks appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The ceasefire could pave the way for rare diplomatic talks, but ongoing security concerns may hinder long-term peace efforts.
The post Netanyahu agrees to 10-day ceasefire with Lebanon brokered by Trump appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Increased market skepticism and potential conflict escalation highlight the fragile state of US-Iran relations amid diplomatic uncertainty.
The post Trump warns of renewed hostilities if no US-Iran ceasefire deal reached appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Trump's potential visit to Pakistan could enhance its role as a mediator, impacting US-Iran peace prospects and market dynamics.
The post Trump open to Pakistan visit for US-Iran peace talks appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Tennessee Senate Committee to Weigh State Bitcoin Reserve Next Week
Tennessee lawmakers will take a fresh look at a proposal to create a state Bitcoin reserve when the Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee hears SB 2639 next Tuesday, April 21.
The “Tennessee Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act” would direct the state to hold Bitcoin as part of its reserve assets, positioning Tennessee as a cryptocurrency policy leader.
The Senate bill, sponsored by Sen. Kerry Roberts, has advanced from the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee and now moves to the powerful Finance panel, which oversees tax and spending measures. Its House companion, HB 1695 from Rep. Jody Barrett, has stalled in the Finance, Ways, and Means Subcommittee after being placed behind the budget and then taken off notice this week, a step that halts further movement unless leadership revives it.
The bill would grant the State Treasurer authority to invest a limited share of select state funds in BTC. The bill’s findings cite inflation as a central concern. Lawmakers state in the bill that rising prices erode the real purchasing power of assets held in the general fund, the revenue fluctuation reserve, and other state pools.
Bitcoin is described in the legislation as a decentralized digital commodity with a fixed supply and global liquidity. The bill argues that a fiduciary investor may use such an asset to improve long-term, inflation-adjusted returns.
“This is about responsible stewardship of public finances,” Barrett said in a statement. He compared bitcoin to gold and framed it as a hedge against inflation.
Tennessee follows a growing wave of U.S. states exploring Bitcoin-focused policy, with lawmakers in South Dakota and Kansas introducing bills that would allow public funds to be allocated to BTC or placed into a strategic Bitcoin and digital assets reserve.
At the same time, states like Rhode Island and Florida have revived or reintroduced legislation aimed at studying BTC, easing its use, or potentially adding it to state balance sheets under defined oversight frameworks.
Under the proposal, the Treasurer could allocate funds from the general fund, the revenue fluctuation reserve, or other state funds approved by lawmakers. Bitcoin exposure would be capped at 10% of each eligible fund at the time of purchase.
Annual purchases would be limited to 5% per fiscal year until the cap is reached. The bill allows passive price gains to push holdings above the cap without forcing sales.
The legislation restricts investments to BTC only. It bars allocations to other cryptocurrencies or digital assets. Bitcoin could be held directly by the state, through a qualified custodian, or via an exchange-traded product tied solely to BTC.
The bill sets detailed custody standards. A “secure custody solution” must store private keys in encrypted hardware kept offline in at least two locations. Access would require encrypted channels and multi-party authorization.
Transparency is also a core feature of the proposal. Every two years, the Treasurer would need to publish a public report. The report would list the amount of bitcoin held, its dollar value at purchase and at the end of the period, and a summary of transactions.
It would also include a cryptographic proof that allows third parties to verify on-chain balances. Security assessment summaries would be available upon request.
The bill also allows the Treasurer to create a program to accept bitcoin for taxes, fees, or other state obligations. Participation would be voluntary. Any bitcoin received would be transferred to the general fund and recorded at market value. Agencies would be reimbursed in dollars.
This post Tennessee Senate Committee to Weigh State Bitcoin Reserve Next Week first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Steak ’n Shake Teases “Bitcoin Milkshake” for Bitcoin Conference 2026
Steak ‘n Shake plans to open Bitcoin Conference 2026 with a themed “Bitcoin Milkshake,” deepening a broader pivot that now spans payments, treasury strategy, and employee compensation in Bitcoin. The limited-time drink presumably will debut on April 27, across participating locations as the chain positions itself as the fast-food brand most aligned with Bitcoin culture.
The company teased the “Bitcoin Milkshake” on X and “new plans”, calling the milkshake the best way to start Bitcoin Conference 2026 and featuring branding tailored to conference attendees and Bitcoin fans. The rollout targets visitors heading to the annual gathering and regular customers who already pay with Bitcoin at the chain’s restaurants.
Steak ‘n Shake expects the product to serve as a marketing hook for its broader Bitcoin strategy, which has moved from payments to balance sheet exposure and worker incentives.
Steak ‘n Shake customers can now pay for burgers and milkshakes, including the new Bitcoin Milkshake, using Bitcoin over the Lightning Network via the Speed wallet.
The chain began accepting Bitcoin payments across 393 U.S. locations in May 2025 and reports lower processing costs and higher sales since the launch. Speed’s integration gives the company real-time visibility into Lightning transactions and has cut payment processing fees by about 50 percent versus card networks, according to Speed.
Alongside the product launch, Steak ‘n Shake has added another $10 million in Bitcoin to its Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, expanding a treasury program that directs all customer-paid Bitcoin into its balance sheet. The company began formal treasury accumulation with an initial $10 million purchase in January, followed by additional notional exposure and reserve growth tied to same-store sales.
Management describes the model as self-sustaining: Bitcoin payments grow sales, which in turn expand the reserve earmarked for store upgrades, menu improvements, and remodeling.
Bitcoin bonus for workers
In March, Steak ‘n Shake introduced a new benefit that pays hourly employees a Bitcoin bonus equal to 21 cents per hour, funded from its Bitcoin-focused reserve. The chain links this incentive to its “Bitcoin-to-burger” initiative, in which Bitcoin revenues help finance both the treasury and worker rewards.
Executives say the program aims to attract employees who follow Bitcoin and to align staff directly with the company’s digital asset strategy.
This post Steak ’n Shake Teases “Bitcoin Milkshake” for Bitcoin Conference 2026 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Charles Schwab to Launch Spot Bitcoin Trading for Retail Clients
Charles Schwab announced further details and plans in their attempt to launch direct spot bitcoin trading through its new platform, Schwab Crypto
, signaling a major step by one of the country’s largest brokerage firms into the digital asset market.
The feature will roll out in phases over the coming weeks and will allow retail clients to buy and sell bitcoin and ethereum through existing Schwab platforms, the bank said.
The move gives millions of Schwab clients the ability to trade bitcoin alongside traditional holdings such as stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds. Clients will access Schwab Crypto through Charles Schwab Premier Bank, SSB, which will act as custodian for the digital assets.
Blockchain infrastructure provider Paxos will handle sub-custody and trade execution under a federally regulated trust structure.
“Clients want to conduct more of their financial lives at Schwab,” said Jonathan Craig, Head of Retail Investing. “With Schwab Crypto, they can trade digital assets within their existing accounts while drawing on the service, research, and tools they rely on.”
At launch, Schwab Crypto will enable direct trading in bitcoin and ethereum, which together represent about three-quarters of global crypto market capitalization.
Schwab will charge a transaction fee of 75 basis points on the dollar value of each trade, placing its pricing at the low end of the brokerage industry. Over time, the firm plans to add more cryptocurrencies and enable transfer capabilities for deposits and withdrawals.
Schwab said its platform will integrate digital assets across Schwab.com, the Schwab Mobile App, and the thinkorswim® trading suite. Clients will retain access to Schwab’s 24/7 customer service network, digital asset education through Schwab Coaching®, and research from the Schwab Center for Financial Research.
Joe Vietri, Head of Digital Assets at Schwab, described the launch as an extension of the firm’s broader digital strategy. “Our goal is to be the destination of choice for retail investors who want to integrate digital assets into their portfolios with confidence,” Vietri said.
Paxos, a New York–based blockchain provider overseen by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, will supply the infrastructure that underpins the new trading offering. Its custody platform is already used by several global financial institutions seeking regulated access to digital assets.
Schwab already holds a strong presence in the digital asset ecosystem, with clients owning roughly 20 percent of spot crypto exchange-traded products. The new feature expands Schwab’s reach beyond indirect crypto exposure through ETFs, mutual funds, and futures tied to cryptocurrency benchmarks.
The company’s entry into spot trading will position it alongside firms such as Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull, which have long provided retail access to major digital currencies.
This post Charles Schwab to Launch Spot Bitcoin Trading for Retail Clients first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Crypto Legislation Nears Finish Line as JPMorgan Sees Breakthrough on Negotiations
Lawmakers in Washington are closing in on a final agreement for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a bill that would establish a comprehensive framework for crypto regulation in the United States, according to reporting from CoinDesk citing JPMorgan sources.
The bank said negotiations have entered a late stage, with most disputes resolved and only a small set of issues still under discussion. One senior policy official said that the list of contentious topics has narrowed from about a dozen to just two or three, signaling a shift toward consensus after years of debate.
At the center of the legislation is a long-standing question over how to divide oversight of digital assets between federal regulators. The bill would formalize jurisdictional boundaries between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, while also defining how tokens, stablecoins and decentralized finance platforms fit within existing financial law.
Lawmakers and industry participants have framed the measure as a critical step toward bringing regulatory certainty to a sector that has operated in a patchwork environment. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials have urged Congress to act, warning that delays risk pushing innovation and capital to foreign markets with clearer rules.
One of the most sensitive issues in negotiations has been whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer crypto yield or yield-like rewards to users. That debate has exposed a divide between crypto firms and traditional banks, which argue that such features could replicate deposit-taking without the same safeguards as insured accounts.
Recent negotiations have produced a compromise that would prohibit passive yield while allowing activity-based rewards tied to payments and platform usage. Policymakers involved in the talks said the framework balances concerns from banks with demands from the digital asset sector for product flexibility.
The stablecoin debate has unfolded alongside a broader policy clash. A White House economic analysis found that banning yield would have limited impact on bank lending, while reducing returns for consumers. In response, the American Bankers Association argued the analysis failed to capture long-term risks, warning that yield-bearing stablecoins could draw deposits away from community banks and raise funding costs for local lenders.
Despite these tensions, JPMorgan said the emerging compromise could attract support from both sides. The bank pointed to growing alignment on key provisions, including anti-money laundering standards, custody requirements and operational rules for exchanges and brokers.
Momentum has also been reinforced by earlier legislative progress. The House of Representatives passed a version of the bill in 2025 with bipartisan support, and Senate negotiators are now working to finalize language ahead of a potential committee markup.
The final text has not been released, and no vote has been scheduled. Timing may prove critical as the 2026 midterm elections approach. A shift in control of Congress could alter legislative priorities and slow progress on crypto policy.
This post Crypto Legislation Nears Finish Line as JPMorgan Sees Breakthrough on Negotiations first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Price Passes $75,000 as Iran War Turns It From ‘Digital Gold’ Into Geopolitical Settlement Bet
Bitcoin price jumped past $75,000 on Wednesday as traders recalibrated what the asset represents in the wake of the Iran conflict and an unusually stretched derivatives market. Price action, positioning data, and a real-world test of bitcoin as a settlement rail now point to a market that values the token as more than a volatile wager on tech risk.
Bitcoin price traded around $74,000 to $75,000 on April 15, extending a rebound that began after a February low near $60,000. The move leaves the asset up roughly 23% from that trough and about 3% on the week, even as broader macro and geopolitical headlines remain tense.
Spot markets now face stiff resistance in the $75,000 to $76,000 band, a zone several analysts flag as the ceiling of a two‑month consolidation range.
Short term, traders frame the outlook around a simple line in the sand. If bitcoin price can hold above support near $71,000 and secure a clean break above $76,000, momentum models start to point toward a run into the high‑$70,000s or even $80,000 over the coming weeks, according to Bitcoin Magazine Pro data.
Failure at that band keeps the range intact and invites another pullback toward $70,000 and the low‑$60,000s where the last leg of the rally started.
Beneath the spot chart, futures markets tell a story of persistent skepticism. The 30‑day average funding rate on perpetual swaps has remained negative for 46 straight days, matching the stretch of negative funding seen near the late‑2022 bear market bottom, according to research firm K33.
That means traders who hold long positions in perpetual futures have collected fees from shorts, even as price has drifted higher.
K33 Head of Research Vetle Lunde notes that similar regimes — rising prices, climbing open interest, and negative funding across daily, weekly, and monthly windows — have appeared near consolidation lows that later resolved higher.
The firm argues that this backdrop now raises the odds of a classic short squeeze if price breaks out, as heavily positioned bears scramble to cover. Only two periods in recent history, March to May 2020 and June to August 2021, have seen longer runs of negative 30‑day funding.
The Iran war has become the crucible for a new narrative about what bitcoin is and why investors hold it. Since U.S. and Israeli airstrikes began in late February, bitcoin price has gained about 12% while the S&P 500 has slipped and gold has sold off, a pattern that jars with the old view of the token as a high‑beta extension of tech stocks.
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan argues that markets are now valuing bitcoin as two instruments at once.
The first leg of that thesis remains the familiar “digital gold” pitch, with bitcoin competing for a slice of a store‑of‑value market measured in tens of trillions of dollars.
The second leg, which Hougan says investors have long treated as remote, is an out‑of‑the‑money call option on bitcoin evolving into a working currency and settlement layer. In that framing, conflict does not simply add volatility to a risk asset; it raises the probability that value routes through neutral rails outside direct control of any single state.
Iran’s decision to demand bitcoin tolls from ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz has turned that abstract option into a live, if imperfect, example. The country announced a $1‑per‑barrel fee in bitcoin for crude shipments, a flow that could reach roughly $20 million in daily settlement volume at current prices. That move places BTC and the bitcoin price in the middle of physical trade tied to one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints.
Hougan links this shift back to the weaponization of traditional payment rails, including the removal of Russia from the SWIFT network in 2022, which a French official likened to a financial nuclear strike. In a world where sanctions and correspondent banking are tools of statecraft, a permissionless network that clears value without central control looks different to both allies and non‑aligned states.
All this underpins the current Bitcoin price push toward $75,000, where charts and geopolitics now intersect on the same line. At the time of writing, the bitcoin price is $74,860.

This post Bitcoin Price Passes $75,000 as Iran War Turns It From ‘Digital Gold’ Into Geopolitical Settlement Bet first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin has spent much of 2026 moving between recovery attempts and macro shocks, yet one part of the market has kept moving in a single direction. Large holders have been buying.
On April 16, Bitfinex highlighted CryptoQuant data showing whales accumulated 270,000 BTC over the previous 30 days, the largest buying spree since 2013, while exchange reserves fell to their lowest level since December 2017.
That combination carries more weight than usual, pointing to a market where available supply is thinning beneath the surface, even while price remains far below the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198.

As of press time, CryptoSlate’s Bitcoin data page shows BTC trading near $74,500, up 0.9% over 24 hours, 3.3% over seven days, and 0.7% over 30 days. Market capitalization stands near $1.5 trillion, and 24-hour volume is just above $41.2 billion.
#1
Those numbers describe a market that has regained balance after a bruising first quarter, though they only show part of the supply picture that the CryptoQuant chart is starting to expose. Price has recovered enough to draw fresh attention, while the deeper change sits in where the coins are and who holds them.
Coins on exchanges are available for quick sale. Coins moved into colder, longer-duration hands take more time and stronger conviction to bring back into the market.
When that transfer happens at scale, price can stay quiet for a period and then respond much more sharply once fresh demand pushes into a thinner pool of supply. That is the core development behind the latest whale activity.
Bitcoin often treats whale accumulation as a sentiment clue, a sign that larger holders expect stronger prices later. The April 16 signal points to something more concrete in market plumbing.
When whales absorb that much BTC in 30 days as exchange balances collapse, the central issue becomes inventory. A market with fewer readily available coins behaves differently once buying pressure arrives.
CryptoSlate reported in February that accumulator addresses received 66,940 BTC in a single day after a liquidation shock, a move worth roughly $4.7 billion at the time. Later that month, CryptoSlate showed whales had added 200,000 BTC in a month, even as short-term demand faded and the market struggled to regain momentum.
The setup was already established. The April 16 CryptoQuant signal extends it and sharpens it.
Persistence is the key change. A one-day spike can reflect custody reshuffling or balance-sheet management. A 30-day accumulation run of 270,000 BTC, paired with seven-year-low exchange reserves, carries the hallmarks of genuine supply removal.
The math around issuance helps explain why this point in the cycle carries extra weight. Since the April 2024 halving, Bitcoin has produced 3.125 BTC per block, leaving annual supply growth far below prior cycles.
CryptoSlate’s Bitcoin reference data notes that more than 20.02 million BTC have already been mined out of the maximum 21 million. In a market already dealing with a finite float, another 270,000 BTC moving into stronger hands changes the balance between buyers and sellers.
A breakout still depends on demand, but the threshold for a larger move becomes easier to reach when fewer coins are near the market price.
The current contradiction sits in plain view. Bitcoin remains about 40.77% below its peak, which keeps the chart far from euphoric.
At the same time, the supply side looks far tighter than the price alone suggests. The 30-day return remains below 1%, suggesting the market is marking time. The CryptoQuant chart points in another direction.
Surface calm can coexist with a shrinking pool of available coins, and that combination often creates the conditions for a sharper move later.
It'd be easy to simply say, “whales are bullish,” but that captures only part of what is happening. Bullishness is a view. A smaller pool of readily available coins is a condition.
Conditions shape how markets move once a catalyst appears. If the largest holders continue to absorb supply and exchange reserves keep falling, Bitcoin requires less incremental demand to produce a larger price response.
That is the mechanism behind the current setup, and it explains why this accumulation wave deserves more attention than the average on-chain signal.
Thin supply becomes powerful once demand returns with enough persistence to test it. That is why ETF flows and treasury buying remain central to the next phase.
The broad pattern since February has been uneven, though the direction over the last several sessions has improved. Farside Investors’ daily Bitcoin ETF flow data shows U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs absorbed $471 million on April 6, then swung to a $159 million outflow on April 7, a $93 million outflow on April 8, and then back to $358 million of inflows on April 9, $256 million on April 10, $411 million on April 14, and $186 million on April 15.
That is a buyer base returning in bursts rather than following a straight line.
The weekly fund data tells a similar story. On March 30, CoinShares reported $414 million in digital asset fund outflows, the first weekly outflow in five weeks, as fears around the Iran conflict and a shift in June FOMC expectations hit sentiment.
The United States drove $445 million of those outflows, while Germany and Canada bought into the weakness. Bitcoin products still held a strong year-to-date net inflow position, though the weekly move showed how quickly macro stress can interrupt demand.
Two weeks later, CoinShares’ report showed $1.1 billion of inflows, the strongest weekly total since early January, with Bitcoin alone taking in $871 million. At the same time, trading volumes at $21 billion remained well below the year-to-date average of $31 billion, and short-Bitcoin products still saw meaningful inflows.
Demand has improved, while conviction remains incomplete and hedging activity continues to play a visible role.
Bitcoin’s public company demand remains active, but is mostly confined to a single company. Strategy’s Bitcoin purchases page shows the company now holds 780,897 BTC at an average acquisition price of $75,577.
Corporate treasury accumulation does not produce the same daily rhythm as ETF flows, though it reaches the same destination. Coins leave the liquid market and move into the hands of those who plan to hold through volatility. If that thesis holds, that is.
When ETF inflows, treasury buying, and whale accumulation occur simultaneously, they drain the same pool of spot inventory.
The market has another reason to focus on this setup, because the macro backdrop remains unresolved. Earlier this month, CryptoSlate noted that Bitcoin entered April on firmer footing after a late-March relief rally, though the recovery still faced a macro test tied to Fed expectations and geopolitical risk.
That framework still applies. ETF demand can return, whales can keep buying, and reserves can keep shrinking, while a sharper repricing in rates or renewed geopolitical pressure can still slow the whole machine.
The recent flow pattern captures that tension well. Buyers are back, though they have not committed to a smooth, uninterrupted run.
That leaves Bitcoin in a position that is both fragile and powerful. Fragile, because the marginal buyer still reacts to macro headlines. Powerful, because once that buyer commits, the spot market may have fewer coins to offer than it did earlier in the year.
This is where the April 16 accumulation data gains broader force. It sits at the junction of supply, ETF demand, corporate buying, and macro sensitivity, all at once.
The next question is simple, even if the answer remains open. Does Bitcoin have enough returning demand to force a repricing in a market that appears short on easy sell-side supply?
A durable yes would reshape how the market behaves from here. A sustained run of positive ETF flows, combined with continued reserve compression and further whale accumulation, would place more pressure on price than the current seven-day gains suggest.
Under those conditions, resistance begins to weaken because the market is working with less nearby inventory. Price advances can also become more abrupt, since the next seller often waits at a higher level.
A second path is less dramatic, though still constructive. Demand can remain positive but inconsistent, as seen in recent ETF flow data and CoinShares’ weekly volume figures.
In that environment, Bitcoin can continue grinding higher or sideways without producing the kind of breakout that pulls in a much wider audience. The supply squeeze remains real, though the market never receives enough demand at once to fully expose it.
That would keep Bitcoin in a regime where every positive week looks promising, and every macro wobble interrupts the move before it fully matures.
A weaker path also deserves attention, though for a narrower reason than usual. The main risk is not the accumulation of data being inaccurate, but being overwhelmed. Macro shocks still have veto power over risk assets.
As Fed expectations shift toward tighter policy and geopolitical stress continues to mount, buyers can step back even while supply remains thin. Under that outcome, Bitcoin trades first as a macro-sensitive asset and second as a scarcity asset.
Another risk sits inside the on-chain data itself. As CryptoSlate noted in February, custody reshuffles can sometimes resemble fresh accumulation. That caveat still belongs in the frame.
The April signal carries more weight because of its duration and its alignment with lower exchange reserves, while disciplined reporting still separates strong evidence from absolute proof.
For now, the clearest conclusion is that Bitcoin has entered a more sensitive market structure. The latest price, the recent ETF inflow rebound, Strategy’s continued buying, and the 270,000 BTC whale accumulation wave all point toward the same outcome.
A larger share of the coin supply appears increasingly unwilling to sell at current levels. If demand keeps returning, the market may discover that the real shortage was hiding in plain sight. If demand fades again, the setup remains incomplete rather than invalidated.
Either way, the whale data adds a crucial detail to the current market map.
Bitcoin is trading against a supply base that may already be tighter than many in the market assume.
Exchange reserves have fallen to their lowest level since December 2017, whales have accumulated at a pace not seen since 2013, ETF inflows have resumed after a shaky stretch, and one of the largest public corporate holders continues to withdraw coins from circulation. Each of those developments has its own logic.
Together, they describe a market where available supply is shrinking while several demand channels are still active.
The result is an asymmetric sensitivity setup. A modest pickup in demand can have a larger effect than it would have in a looser market. A pause in demand can leave Bitcoin range-bound for longer, though the underlying supply picture would still remain tight.
That is why the next few weeks could carry unusual importance
The post Bitcoin whales just bought the most BTC since 2013 – so why is the price stuck below $80,000? appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin's latest recovery has pushed the flagship digital asset back toward the $75,000 level, tracking a broader return in risk appetite as hopes for de-escalation in the Middle East lifted global equities to fresh records.
However, the move is running into a quieter constraint than geopolitics or crypto-specific sentiment: the bond market still shows a Federal Reserve that remains in no hurry to loosen policy.
That backdrop has become more important as the succession battle at the US central bank enters a more volatile phase.
The Senate Banking Committee has scheduled Kevin Warsh's confirmation hearing for April 21, while Jerome Powell's current term as chair ends on May 15.
Powell's term as a Fed governor runs until Jan. 31, 2028, and he said last month that if his successor is not confirmed by the time his chairmanship expires, he would serve as chair pro tem until that happens.
For crypto investors, that means the question is no longer only whether Warsh reaches the chair. It is whether the market begins to believe that a change at the top would actually alter the path of rates and liquidity.
The Fed's March meeting pointed in the opposite direction. Officials left the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 3.5% to 3.75%, said inflation remained somewhat elevated, and repeated that any further adjustments would depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.
One of the most important macro variables for Bitcoin right now is the pricing of policy in the front end of the rates market.
CME said this week that March brought a dramatic repricing in short-term rate markets, with the 2-year Treasury yield swinging through a 50-basis-point range and FedWatch showing “no hike by December” as the base case for traders in 2026. That is not the profile of a market betting on a clean, aggressive easing cycle.
This metric is prescient because Bitcoin has spent most of this recovery trading like part of the broader global risk complex.
The same cease-fire hopes that pulled oil lower from recent peaks and helped send world equities back to record highs also revived expectations that inflation pressure from the Iran war might ease, a shift that helped gold and other non-yielding assets recover.
While Bitcoin has participated in that move, it has not escaped the larger debate over how restrictive US policy will remain.
The distinction is important. Crypto does not need a formal rate cut to respond. It needs the market to believe that financial conditions are becoming easier.
At the moment, that belief is still partial. Investors are willing to buy risk when oil falls, and war fears recede, but the rates market still reflects a Fed that wants more proof before it moves. That leaves BTC's rebound dependent on a macro repricing that has started only cautiously.
Warsh's nomination was supposed to give markets a clearer line of sight on the post-Powell Fed. Instead, the handoff has become tangled in legal and political risk.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said this week that he remains optimistic that Warsh will take the chair on time, but Republican Sen. Thom Tillis has vowed to block the nomination while a Justice Department investigation into Powell remains active. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has also urged the committee not to move forward under that cloud.
Powell has hardened that uncertainty rather than resolved it. In his March press conference, he said that if Warsh was not confirmed by the end of his term, he would remain chair pro tem, and that he had no intention of leaving the Board until the investigation was over “with transparency and finality.”
All of this uncertainty and stalemate have caused Warsh's May 15 confirmation odds on prediction markets like Polymarket to slip to 42%, down from highs of 80% earlier this year.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has since threatened to fire Powell if he stays after May 15, deepening the risk of an institutional clash just as markets are trying to price the next policy regime.
As a result, the practical consequence for markets is continuity. Even if Warsh is ultimately confirmed, any delay extends the life of the same cautious policy framework that has defined the Fed this year.
The current committee lineup remains Powell-led, and the March vote itself showed only one dissent, with Governor Stephen Miran preferring a quarter-point cut while the rest backed no change.
That shows at least one visible split, though the committee still looks broadly aligned.
The case for restraint is clear in the data: the unemployment rate stood at 4.3% in March, according to the Labor Department, while core CPI was up 2.6% from a year earlier.
New York Fed President John Williams said on Thursday that the war in the Middle East is already feeding inflation pressures through higher energy and transport costs. St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem said a recent oil shock could keep core inflation near 3% for the rest of the year and leave rates on hold for some time.
But the Fed funds rate is only part of the transmission mechanism for crypto. The deeper issue is liquidity, which brings the balance sheet back into focus.
The Fed's total assets stood at about $6.69 trillion as of April 8, according to Federal Reserve data carried by FRED.
More importantly, the March policy directive showed the central bank is still increasing System Open Market Account holdings through purchases of Treasury bills and, if needed, other Treasuries with maturities of three years or less to maintain an ample level of reserves.
It is also rolling over principal payments from Treasury holdings and reinvesting agency principal into Treasury bills.
That plumbing is not the same as a full easing cycle, but it is important for markets built around liquidity narratives.
Warsh has been identified with a different mix: less tolerance for a large Fed balance sheet and more skepticism toward the bond-buying programs that expanded it.
In fact, Reuters has reported that he has criticized the Fed's balance-sheet management and pushed for less quantitative easing and a smaller portfolio. That combination can read as hawkish for liquidity in the near term, even if investors decide it is pro-growth over a longer horizon.
The next clue comes quickly. Warsh's April 21 hearing will tell markets whether senators see him as a clean handoff candidate or as part of a broader fight over Fed independence.
Investors will be listening for his views on three linked questions: whether supply-driven inflation from the Iran war should be looked through, whether a lower policy rate can coexist with a smaller balance sheet, and whether he would preserve the Fed's cautious, data-dependent stance or try to redefine it.
After that, attention shifts back to the calendar that actually moves asset prices. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for April 28-29, according to the minutes of the March meeting.
If Warsh is not yet confirmed, Powell remains the face of policy, and the market is likely to read any statement through the same wait-and-see framework it has been trading all year.
Even if Warsh does get through later, the bar for a durable crypto breakout will remain the same: traders must start to believe that front-end rates and reserve management are moving in a direction that loosens financial conditions rather than simply preventing stress.
That is why the quiet signal counts more than the loud one. Bitcoin can rise on truce headlines, ETF demand, and improved risk appetite, and all three have helped it recover.
However, unless the rates market begins to price a softer Fed path, or at least a more accommodative liquidity backdrop, the rally remains exposed to the same ceiling that has constrained it for much of the year.
For Bitcoin, the headline drama is in Washington. The more important variable is still trading on the short end of the US curve.
The post Bitcoin’s recovery hits a Fed ceiling with no sign of cheaper money appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Traditional equities like the S&P 500 are staging a historic comeback, shaking off weeks of geopolitical anxiety to chart new all-time highs.
Yet Bitcoin, which has historically been a synchronized beneficiary of risk-on sentiment, is noticeably dragging its feet, leaving investors questioning what is missing from its narrative.
The S&P 500 closed higher by 0.8% this week, pushing the benchmark index to a record 7,022.95 and eclipsing its previous peak established in late January.
The milestone marks a dramatic reversal from the turbulent first quarter, where the index plummeted nearly 10% to a local bottom of 6,316.91 on March 30 amid the US-Israel-Iran conflict and subsequent oil price shocks.
While Wall Street celebrates a return to “greed” and heavily capitalized tech stocks reclaim their market dominance, Bitcoin remains ensnared in a prolonged consolidation phase.
The flagship cryptocurrency continues to trade significantly below its previous all-time high, highlighting a rare and persistent decoupling from traditional risk assets that has not been observed with this severity since 2020.
The velocity of the stock market’s recovery has caught many institutional desks off guard.
In the two weeks since the late-March lows, markets have rapidly adjusted to the sustained geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East and added over $6 trillion in market capitalization.
According to Warren Pies, founder of 3F Research, the market’s trajectory over the last ten days represents a statistical anomaly. The S&P 500’s near 10% surge places it in the 99.7th percentile of all 10-day returns.

Historically, there have been only 20 instances since 1950 where the stock market has recorded such aggressive short-term gains. Pies characterized these events as bullish “momentum thrusts,” which typically yield an average return of 19% over the next twelve months.
However, what makes the current equity rally unique is its proximity to all-time highs.
According to Pies, the previous momentum thrusts almost exclusively occurred during deep bear markets, with indices still languishing 20% or more below their peaks.
Meanwhile, the current market recovery has been distinctly top-heavy. Since the March 30 low, a fund tracking the “Magnificent 7” mega-cap technology stocks has surged nearly 18%, outpacing the broader S&P 500 by roughly 8% when excluding those seven companies.
This aggressive institutional buying is largely driven by the “AI-Infrastructure” narrative, with sector leaders like Oracle serving as the primary engines of global productivity growth.
Moreover, the macroeconomic backdrop has also provided a robust tailwind.
Easing tensions in the Persian Gulf, highlighted by diplomatic talks and a temporary ceasefire, has alleviated immediate fears of a prolonged blockade in the Strait of Hormuz.
At the same time, the US Producer Price Index (PPI) data for March came in well below expectations at 0.1%, showing that the US economy remains highly resilient and largely insulated from the temporary energy-driven inflation spikes that capped market gains earlier in the year.
While the Nasdaq Composite simultaneously celebrated a 10-day winning streak, its longest since late 2021, the digital asset sector has failed to mirror this unbridled optimism.
Despite the easing macroeconomic pressures, Bitcoin remains heavily discounted, hovering around the $74,000 to $76,000 range.
This represents a staggering 40% drawdown from its previous all-time high of more than $126,000, reflecting the sluggishness that has persisted for several months.
Data compiled by CryptoQuant highlights this divergence. According to the firm, Bitcoin has traditionally operated as a high-beta asset that loosely follows the liquidity trends of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.

However, its current price performance is being driven by its own internal sluggish dynamics. As a result, the current period of weak correlation with the S&P 500 is now the longest stretch observed in over four years.
This is also evident in the fact that the sentiment across the digital asset space has transitioned into a “complacency phase.”
According to analytics firm Alphractal, broader crypto market sentiment sits at a neutral, borderline bullish level, which is highly unusual given the asset's significant distance from price discovery.

Underneath the hood, on-chain data reveals exactly why Bitcoin is struggling to break out: a severe lack of sustained capital inflow.
Alex Adler, an analyst at CryptoQuant, pointed to the 30-day Realized Cap change, a metric that tracks net capital inflow into the Bitcoin network.
Since mid-January, the metric has been flashing warning signs. Out of the first 105 days of 2026, only seven recorded a positive 30-day Realized Cap change. Since January 23, capital has been systematically leaving the network, culminating in an extreme localized outflow in late February.
Adler noted:
“Since mid-January, capital has been systematically leaving the network without meeting compensating demand.”
While the outflow pressure has slowed in recent weeks, improving to -0.32% from steeper deficits earlier in the month, a true macroeconomic reversal has not yet occurred.
For Bitcoin to mount a credible attack on its all-time highs, Adler argues that the Realized Cap must transition into sustained positive territory for several weeks, accompanied by price appreciation above key short-term holder cost bases.
There are, however, preliminary signs of structural repair. Bitcoin is currently testing its Adjusted Realized Price, which sits at roughly $72,300. This metric represents the average break-even level for a massive cohort of active investors.
Reclaiming and holding this cost basis is traditionally a prerequisite for a sustained bullish trend, serving as a critical psychological support level that encourages investors to hold rather than capitulate during pullbacks.
Despite the lack of a definitive breakout, institutional footprint in the crypto market remains highly visible.
Rachel Lucas, a crypto analyst at BTC Markets, highlighted that Bitcoin's recent push toward a 70-day high of $76,000 was heavily subsidized by $411.5 million in daily spot ETF inflows, the second-largest single-day figure recorded in April.
Furthermore, options markets are reflecting a subtle shift in risk appetite. According to Block Scholes, the strong skew towards put contracts (downside protection) in Bitcoin options markets has begun to ease following the de-escalation in the Middle East.
Yet, this easing of downside fear has not directly translated into aggressive spot buying.
Glassnode data indicates that while spot and ETF demand are improving, the market is characterized by quick profit-taking and cautious options positioning.
According to the firm, the current recovery is highly “twitchy” and flow-driven, lacking the deep-seated conviction seen in traditional equities.
Considering this, market-structure analysts at Bitunix told CryptoSlate that Bitcoin is currently serving as a real-time test of the market due to its capacity to absorb risk.
The asset faces a formidable supply zone and clear resistance around $75,500, with a dense cluster of leveraged liquidations stacked just above $76,000.
For now, the $70,000 level remains the critical support floor that institutional buyers are actively defending.
If Bitcoin can convincingly clear the $76,000 resistance, it could trigger a cascading short squeeze, forcefully ending the asset's historic decoupling and realigning it with the broader, record-setting Wall Street supercycle.
Lucas explained:
“A sustained break above US$76,000 would represent a meaningful structural shift and open the path toward the $80,000 handle.”
Until then, the crypto market remains in a tense holding pattern, waiting for the capital inflows required to validate a new bull phase.
The post Why S&P 500’s $6 trillion melt up rally exposes Bitcoin amid range-bound weakness appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin's debate about quantum computers produced a published draft with real political consequences on Apr. 14.
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 361 (BIP 361), titled “Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset,” landed in Bitcoin's official proposal repository with a three-phase plan to phase out ECDSA and Schnorr signature spends entirely once a quantum-resistant output type exists on the network.
The proposal builds directly on BIP 360, published in February, which introduced a new address format that strips Taproot's quantum-vulnerable key-path spend, called Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). The proposal also preserved compatibility with Lightning, BitVM, and multi-signature setups.
Together, the two drafts constitute the most explicit governance posture Bitcoin has adopted regarding quantum migration to date.
What makes this moment sharp is the external calendar hardening around it, as NIST finalized FIPS 203, 204, and 205 in August 2024 and urged organizations to begin migrating immediately.
The UK's NCSC has set migration milestones for 2028, 2031, and 2035, while US federal agencies face a 2035 quantum-transition target.
Governments, banks, and national cyber agencies already have migration deadlines on their calendars, making blockchains late arrivals to that debate.

What separates BIP 361 from prior Bitcoin post-quantum (PQ) discussions is its deliberate coerciveness.
Phase A, three years past the activation of a quantum-resistant address type, blocks new sends to vulnerable address formats. Phase B, two years later, invalidates ECDSA and Schnorr spends from quantum-vulnerable UTXOs at the consensus layer. Coins that have not migrated get frozen.
A possible Phase C would allow frozen coin holders to prove ownership via zero-knowledge proofs linked to a BIP-39 seed phrase and to recover their funds via a later recovery mechanism.
The proposal's authors, including Jameson Lopp of Casa, frame this as a defense. As of Mar. 1, over 34% of all Bitcoin sat in addresses whose public keys had already been exposed on-chain, making those coins theoretically readable by a quantum machine running Shor's algorithm.
Google researchers estimated in recent work that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could crack a Bitcoin private key in roughly nine minutes, with one analysis citing 2029 as a plausible outer bound for a cryptographically relevant machine.
The counterargument arrived on the mailing list immediately.
Tadge Dryja, a Bitcoin developer and Lightning Network co-author, said that the plan is not viable in its current form because it ties the activation of quantum-resistant outputs to the deactivation of elliptic-curve outputs.
That link, Dryja argued, could destroy coins preemptively and relies on definitions of “quantum-vulnerable UTXO” still contested in practice.
The BIPs repository explicitly states that inclusion certifies only that a proposal met formal editorial criteria, with community endorsement and activation timing being separate determinations.
BIP 360 is already running on Bitcoin's quantum testnet, deployed by BTQ Technologies in early 2026. BIP 361 co-author Ethan Heilman has estimated that a full Bitcoin migration to quantum resilience would take seven years from the day consensus forms.
Justin Sun published his own declaration on post-quantum resistance.
In a post on X, the Tron founder announced that the network is officially launching a post-quantum upgrade initiative to become the first major public blockchain to deploy NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptographic signatures on mainnet.
Sun wrote that “while Bitcoin debates whether to freeze vulnerable coins and Ethereum forms research committees, Tron is building.” He added that a technical roadmap is “coming soon.”
Tron holds roughly $86.7 billion in stablecoins, about 97.78% of which is USDT, alongside approximately $5.1 billion in total value locked in DeFi.
Post-quantum readiness on a chain of that scale becomes a question of custody and settlement infrastructure. The networks, exchanges, and custodians moving dollar liquidity through Tron have operational keys, admin paths, and bridge mechanisms that a quantum attacker targeting high-value addresses would prioritize first.
Tron's current public posture is narrative compression, consisting of decisive language and competitive positioning of the scheme selection, migration model, wallet compatibility plan, and activation path needed to verify what “first major public blockchain” actually means in practice.
| Category | Bitcoin | TRON | Ethereum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance style | Open, adversarial, consensus-driven | Executive-led, founder-driven messaging | Open, layered, research-led |
| Public status today | BIP 361 published as a draft in official repo; BIP 360 already published | Initiative announced by Justin Sun; roadmap still pending | Official PQ portal live; active roadmap and devnets |
| Core migration model | Phased sunset of legacy signatures after a PQ output exists | Undisclosed so far; Sun says NIST-standardized PQ signatures on mainnet | Gradual migration via account abstraction, precompiles, and later consensus changes |
| Main policy logic | Force migration with future restrictions and eventual invalidation of vulnerable spends | Claim speed and decisiveness before full technical detail | Build cryptographic agility and avoid a disruptive flag day |
| What users may face | New sends blocked to vulnerable formats, later frozen legacy coins if not migrated | Unknown until roadmap: optional, hybrid, or mandatory migration not yet specified | Wallet and account upgrades spread over time rather than a single cutoff |
| What is already specified publicly | Phase A / Phase B / possible Phase C; definition of vulnerable UTXOs under debate | Narrative claim, competitive framing, “roadmap coming soon” | Execution-, consensus-, and data-layer approach; weekly interoperability devnets |
| What is still missing | Consensus, activation path, final definition of quantum-vulnerable outputs | Scheme choice, migration model, wallet compatibility plan, activation path | Single fixed migration date or standalone flagship PQ proposal |
| Main risk/trade-off | Protect the network but risk freezing or stranding coins | Strong messaging without yet-published operational detail | Flexible migration but less coordination pressure on a fixed timetable |
| Key infrastructure at stake | Legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys | Stablecoin settlement rail, custody, admin keys, bridges | EOAs, bridges, validator keys, execution-layer migration |
| Best one-line summary | Certainty requires deadlines | Speed is the product | Safety requires agility |
NIST's relevant standards, such as ML-DSA, FN-DSA, and SLH-DSA, carry different trade-offs in signature size, verification speed, and implementation complexity, and choosing among them is a material technical decision.
Ethereum takes the structural opposite of Bitcoin's forced deadlines.
The Ethereum Foundation launched pq.ethereum.org in March 2026 as a hub for its post-quantum research, roadmap, and open-source repositories, with more than 10 client teams running weekly post-quantum interoperability devnets.
The roadmap spans three layers. At the execution layer, native account abstraction, as defined by EIP-7701 and EIP-8141, provides a built-in migration path away from ECDSA, allowing users to rotate to quantum-safe authentication via smart accounts without requiring a protocol-wide cutover.
At the consensus layer, BLS signatures would eventually give way to hash-based alternatives under the leanSig scheme, which combines XMSS-style quantum resistance with STARK-based aggregation to offset the size and performance costs of post-quantum primitives.
The Foundation's own assessment places core L1 protocol upgrades around 2029, with full execution layer migration extending beyond that date.
Ethereum's February 2026 protocol priorities post made the intersection explicit, with native account abstraction providing a natural migration path away from ECDSA-based authentication, while developers are working on complementary EIPs to make quantum-resistant signature verification cheaper in the EVM.
Ethereum has an official roadmap and an active engineering track, with Glamsterdam targeted for the first half of 2026, and it is arriving with no standalone quantum proposal introducing a fixed migration date.
The bull case runs through cryptographic agility.
If the threat stays far enough out, and NIST's estimate that full integration can take 10 to 20 years from standardization supports that reading, chains can migrate without emergency powers.
Bitcoin's sunset logic narrows to the most clearly exposed outputs or evolves into a softer incentive structure.
Tron eventually publishes a roadmap that names its scheme and migration model, and the market rewards systems that make migration boring: smart accounts, precompiles, key rotation, and wallet updates handled gradually enough that no user wakes up locked out.
Ethereum's own team has said L1 protocol upgrades could be completed around 2029, the cleanest publicly stated timeline among the major chains in this race.
| Scenario | Bitcoin | TRON | Ethereum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull case: long runway, orderly migration | Sunset logic softens or narrows to the clearest exposed outputs; migration happens before emergency politics take over | TRON publishes a credible roadmap, names a scheme, and turns executive speed into operational execution | Account abstraction, precompiles, and staged upgrades make migration gradual and boring |
| What wins in this scenario | Clear incentives plus enough time for wallets and custodians to adapt | Fast coordination across wallets, exchanges, and stablecoin infrastructure | Cryptographic agility across layers without a disruptive flag day |
| Bear case: selective attacks arrive early | Pressure lands first on exposed or high-value legacy coins; governance fight over freezes happens before consensus is mature | Stablecoin rail concentration turns custody keys, admin paths, and bridges into prime targets | EOAs, bridges, and validator keys become the first pressure points |
| What breaks in this scenario | Political legitimacy of freezing coins vs letting them be stolen | Narrative advantage collapses if no published runbook exists | Diffuse roadmap looks slow if markets suddenly demand a hard timetable |
| Bottom line | Most direct defense, but also the most coercive | Fastest rhetoric, but proof depends on roadmap details | Most complete migration architecture, but still without a single forcing date |
The bear case begins where Ethereum's own portal draws the boundary, and early quantum machines may target a small number of high-value keys.
Bitcoin faces its hardest political test under that scenario because BIP 361 already exposes more than 34% of BTC on-chain, and any selective attack on Satoshi-era or P2PK coins would force the governance question before consensus has formed.
Ethereum's exposure is concentrated in externally owned accounts, bridges, and validator keys, the exact places a well-resourced attacker would try to exploit first.
Tron's concentration as a USDT rail makes custody and admin-key migration the first thing to scrutinize, and a narrative initiative without a published technical roadmap offers no operational protection under those conditions.
Bitcoin says certainty requires deadlines, Ethereum says safety requires agility, and Tron says speed is the product. None of those positions is obviously wrong.
A coercive Bitcoin deadline forces migration but risks leaving coins behind whose owners cannot be reached.
Ethereum's layered approach spreads migration pain over years but lacks a single focal point to coordinate wallets, custodians, and exchanges on the same timetable.
Tron's executive speed may prove real, or it may prove to be another well-timed announcement awaiting a second act.
The actual contest over which governance model can move users, infrastructure, and hundreds of billions in assets before a quantum adversary selects the weakest node belongs to whoever has a runbook when the window closes.
The post Bitcoin’s quantum migration plan forces the network to choose between frozen and stolen coins appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The SEC moved the crypto market structure forward on Apr. 13 without waiting for Congress to act.
The agency's Division of Trading and Markets published a staff statement on Covered User Interfaces, such as websites, browser extensions, wallet-linked apps, and mobile applications that help users in self-custodial setups prepare transactions in crypto asset securities.
Staff said it will not object to these providers operating without broker-dealer registration under Exchange Act Section 15, provided they stay inside a strict set of behavioral and disclosure guardrails.
That framing of the conditional, narrow, and deliberately provisional reflects that the SEC is far enough into its own regulatory program to sketch operating conditions for an on-chain securities stack, yet still dependent on Congress for anything that lasts.
A Covered User Interface Provider qualifies if it allows users to customize transaction parameters, avoids soliciting specific trades, relies on pre-disclosed and independently verifiable routing logic, and presents execution options based on objective factors such as price or speed, among others.
The statement expressly includes distributed ledger trading systems, such as automated market maker (AMM) liquidity pools and liquidity aggregators, as venues to which these interfaces may connect.
That is the first time the SEC has described, with any operational specificity, how a self-custodial interface layer for crypto asset securities could function while staying outside broker status.

For tokenized securities builders, the operating picture that emerges is a deliberately thin stack consisting of software that helps users express preferences, inspect routes, compare prices and gas costs, and sign via a self-custodial wallet.
The document draws the outer edge at anything that looks like intermediation, such as no recommendations, no discretionary order routing, no execution, no custody of funds or stablecoins, no settlement, no financing arrangements, and no soliciting specific trades.
Any interface that negotiates transaction terms, holds user assets, executes or settles transactions, arranges financing, conducts independent valuations, or processes trade documentation falls outside the scope of the statement.
Compensation tied to specific products, venues, routes, or counterparties also disqualifies a provider.
The SEC's permitted zone covers objective route display and user-directed parameter settings. Anything involving execution, routing discretion, or custody requalifies a provider as a broker.
The statement explicitly pointed out that an intermediary business model requires broker registration, regardless of whether the wallet is self-custodial. Its scope ends at the interface layer, leaving full-service DeFi products entirely outside its coverage.
Protocols that hold assets in smart contracts, execute swaps on behalf of users, or bundle routing with custody are intermediaries in a different regulatory category.
The relief is specific to a product shape, with the broader on-chain trading economy outside the statement's scope.
The Apr. 13 statement is the third in a deliberate sequence. On Jan. 30, the SEC published a statement on tokenized securities, framing it as part of a broader effort to clarify how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets.
On Mar. 17, the agency described its interpretive work on crypto asset law as a major step toward clarity, complementing Congress's market structure work.
Commissioner Hester Peirce and Trading and Markets Director Jamie Selway both described the Apr. 13 release as incremental infrastructure for tokenized securities and crypto market structure.
In February, Chairman Paul Atkins and Peirce said staff were working on an exemption for limited trading of certain tokenized securities on novel platforms, including AMMs. Peirce later said the exemption under consideration would be narrow.
The markets these rules address already carry real volume. RWA.xyz currently shows $29.3 billion in distributed real-world assets, over $1 billion in tokenized public equities and ETFs, and $13.4 billion in tokenized US Treasuries.
DTCC has said DTC is preparing a tokenization service for the second half of 2026. The SEC is sketching rules for a market that already has users and transfer activity.

The bull case runs through the narrower exemption arriving before the legislative window closes.
If the SEC follows the Apr. 13 neutral interface statement with a bounded AMM pilot that caps, allowlists, and governs on-chain tokenized securities trading along the lines Atkins described, on-chain tokenized securities trading becomes operational inside a bounded regulatory box.
Builders who designed their interfaces around the neutral software standard would have infrastructure in place when the exemption lands. The payoff is an on-chain securities stack that is functional, if constrained, before Congress finalizes a broader statute.
The bear case is product paralysis at the product edge. Because the statement carries no legal force, creates no enforceable rights, and expires in five years absent Commission action, counsel at cautious organizations may treat the Apr. 13 lane as too fragile for anything ambitious. Interfaces stay informational or routing-light.
Serious tokenized securities trading concentrates in incumbent-led, permissioned pilots, such as DTCC's tokenization service, large-bank programs, and similar structures built around registered entities, while the product architectures the statement aimed to enable get deferred indefinitely.
The document's own disclaimer conveys the fragility as staff views only, without legal force or effect, and short of the Commission's action that would give it durability.
Senate Banking announced a crypto market structure markup in January and postponed it as bipartisan talks continued. As of Apr. 15, no new public markup date appears in committee materials.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged Congress to pass the CLARITY Act on Apr. 9.
All three data points converge on the same conclusion: only a statute can keep a lane open established by the SEC.
Galaxy Research and the Blockchain Association pressed the SEC on Apr. 14 for conditional AMM relief, while SIFMA argued new on-chain trading structures should proceed under durable rulemaking with comparable investor-protection standards.
That three-way split between agency staff, crypto-native industry, and incumbent financial infrastructure is precisely the configuration that makes Congressional resolution necessary and politically difficult.
| Stakeholder | What they want | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| SEC staff | Narrow operating room under existing authority | Lets parts of the market move now without waiting for Congress |
| Crypto-native industry | Conditional AMM relief and workable tokenized-securities rails | Wants real product deployment before legislation is finished |
| Incumbent financial infrastructure / SIFMA | Durable rulemaking and comparable investor-protection standards | Pushes for permanence, predictability, and traditional safeguards |
| Congress | A statutory market-structure framework | Only path to durable, non-reversible clarity |
Chairman Atkins has consistently framed Project Crypto as a complement to legislative work. The Apr. 13 statement is the clearest expression of that posture, being real enough to build around now, and contingent enough to require something more durable.
The post Why the SEC just gave self custody crypto apps 5 years to get traditional broker licenses appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitpanda has officially relaunched its professional trading infrastructure under the banner of Bitpanda Fusion 2.0. While the original Fusion platform introduced the concept of liquidity aggregation, the 2.0 evolution takes a "leap forward" by integrating even more global liquidity providers and expanding the asset range to unprecedented levels for a regulated entity.
Bitpanda Fusion 2.0 is a comprehensive relaunch of Bitpanda’s professional trading suite. It combines aggregated liquidity from 12+ global order books, offering deeper market depth and tighter spreads. Unlike its predecessor, Fusion 2.0 now supports over 2,000 trading pairs and features a revamped interface designed for institutional-grade execution.

The defining feature of Bitpanda Fusion 2.0 is its sophisticated aggregation engine. Instead of operating as a closed-loop crypto exchange, Fusion 2.0 acts as a high-speed gateway to the global market.
Fusion 2.0 connects to more than a dozen of the world's largest liquidity providers and exchanges. This ensures that even during high volatility, traders can execute large blocks with minimal slippage.
One of the most significant upgrades in the 2.0 relaunch is the asset variety. With over 2,000 trading pairs, Fusion 2.0 dwarfs most European competitors.

Bitpanda Fusion 2.0 is specifically tailored for those who have moved beyond retail investing. The platform now includes:
As reported by authority outlets like Reuters and the Financial Times, the European regulatory landscape is tightening. Bitpanda Fusion 2.0 stands as a fully compliant, EU-regulated platform (MiCA, MiFID II, and VASP). This provides a "Safe Haven" for professional traders who require legal certainty alongside performance.
| Feature | Bitpanda Fusion 2.0 | Traditional EU Exchanges |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity Source | 12+ Global Venues | Single Venue |
| Trading Pairs | 2,000+ | 300 - 500 |
| Fees | 0.02% - 0.25% | 0.25% - 0.50% |
| Regulation | Fully EU-Regulated | Varies (often offshore) |
| Fiat Access | Direct EUR, CHF, GBP | Often EUR only |
Professor Jiang (Xueqin Jiang), a Chinese-Canadian educator turned viral geopolitical commentator, has publicly claimed that Bitcoin is a CIA operation.
Already famous for his "Predictive History" and bold forecasts regarding the decline of Western hegemony, Jiang’s recent stance on Bitcoin adds a layer of skepticism to the digital asset's decentralized narrative. While most see $BTC$ as a hedge against fiat, Jiang argues it may be a sophisticated tool of the very empire he predicts will soon collapse.
Professor Jiang Xueqin rose to international prominence via his YouTube channel, Predictive History. A Yale graduate and former educator at elite Chinese institutions like the Affiliated High School of Peking University, Jiang has transitioned into a "geopolitical prophet" for the digital age.
He gained massive traction in 2024 and 2025 for his remarkably accurate predictions concerning Middle Eastern conflicts. Most notably, his assertions that the United States would find itself embroiled in a losing battle against Iran have made him a polarizing yet watched figure. Jiang utilizes a mix of game theory, historical cycles, and eschatology to argue that the current global order is reaching a terminal point.
In a recent series of lectures and social media posts, Jiang pivoted his focus toward financial sovereignty. His core argument suggests that Bitcoin’s anonymity and global reach serve the interests of U.S. intelligence agencies—specifically the CIA.
"Bitcoin is not the exit from the system; it is the trapdoor within it," Jiang suggested in a recent commentary.
Jiang’s theory rests on several controversial pillars:
While these claims lack empirical evidence and are often dismissed by the $Bitcoin community as "tinfoil hat" rhetoric, Jiang’s track record with geopolitical forecasts has given his followers pause.
Jiang’s distrust of Bitcoin is deeply tied to his view of the U.S.-Iran war. He predicts that as the U.S. dollar faces a crisis of confidence due to overextension in the Middle East, the "CIA-backed" Bitcoin will be pushed as a temporary lifeboat to maintain American influence over global capital flows when the greenback fails.
According to Jiang, the U.S. "empire" is committing strategic suicide through its involvement in Iran. He argues that the loss of this conflict will signal the end of the "Pax Americana," and that assets like Bitcoin are part of a broader "Secret History" of the world intended to manage the transition to a new, perhaps more controlled, digital financial era.
Professor Jiang represents a growing trend of "anti-system" intellectuals who view every facet of modern life through the lens of power struggles. While his claims about Bitcoin being a CIA project align with long-standing urban legends (like the "Satoshi is a group of NSA agents" theory), they remain speculative.
The cryptocurrency market is entering a phase of high-tension consolidation this April 16, 2026. While Bitcoin remains the primary barometer for risk appetite, institutional infrastructure is evolving rapidly. Today's headlines are dominated by two major themes: Bitcoin's battle with psychological resistance and a massive shift in how institutional Ethereum products generate yield.
As of April 16, 2026, the crypto market is showing a bullish bias despite tight price ranges.

Bitcoin has spent the last 48 hours grinding within a narrow corridor between $73,400 and $75,300. Technical analysts point to a "compression" phase, where low volatility often precedes a massive directional breakout.
The Money Flow Index (MFI) is currently at 79.00, its highest level in this recovery cycle. Historically, when the MFI approaches the 80.00 "overbought" threshold while price remains just below resistance, it suggests heavy institutional accumulation rather than retail exhaustion. If BTC clears the $76,000 mark, the path to the $150,000 target projected by Standard Chartered earlier this year remains structurally intact.

A major catalyst for Ethereum today is the announcement from the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ETHB). The fund has entered a definitive agreement with Coinbase Prime to enable staking for the ETH held within the trust.
In a move that caught many by surprise, the U.S. SEC Division of Trading and Markets issued a statement regarding "Covered User Interface Providers." The commission noted it would not object to software providers offering interfaces for crypto asset securities without registering as broker-dealers, provided they do not exercise discretion over transactions. This provides much-needed legal clarity for decentralized exchanges and DeFi protocols.
| Asset | Current Price | 24h Change | Key Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin (BTC) | $74,428 | +0.08% | Resistance at $76,016 |
| Ethereum (ETH) | $3,450 | +1.20% | Support at $3,300 |
| Solana (SOL) | $185.50 | -0.45% | Support at $180 |
We've reviewed enough CFD brokers to know that most of them blur together after a while. TradeEU Global does a handful of things well, keeps the experience simple, and doesn't try to pretend it's something it's not. That actually counts for more than you'd think in this space.
Here's our full TradeEU Global review for 2026 after spending time on the platform.
Before we get into features and fees, let's talk about what actually happens when you sign up — because that's where a lot of brokers already start losing people.
TradeEU Global's registration is quick. You fill in your details, upload an ID and a proof of address document, and you're through. Once verified, you land in a personal dashboard that lays everything out without burying things in submenus: account balance, open positions, deposit options, transaction history. It felt organized in a way that suggests someone actually thought about the user flow here, rather than just slapping a back-office panel together.
The minimum deposit is $250 across all account types. Not the lowest in the industry, but not unreasonable either.

This is probably the single best thing about TradeEU Global in 2026.
Instead of building a half-baked proprietary charting tool (which too many brokers do), they've integrated TradingView directly into the WebTrader. That means proper charting — multiple timeframes, drawing tools, over 100 indicators, and the kind of layout flexibility that TradingView users already know and expect.
The WebTrader runs entirely in-browser. No downloads, no Java plugins from 2012, no "please install our desktop client" prompts. It loaded fast, charts rendered smoothly, and placing orders felt responsive even with several pairs open at once. We also tested the mobile app on iOS and had no issues — trades placed on desktop showed up instantly on the phone, and vice versa.
It's not going to replace a full institutional-grade terminal, but let's be real: if you're reading a broker review, you probably don't need one. For analyzing setups, placing trades, and managing risk, the TradeEU Global platform handles it.

TradeEU Global lists 350+ instruments, and to their credit, the selection is practical:
The ETF access is worth calling out specifically. If you want diversified market exposure without opening a separate brokerage account, having ETF CFDs alongside traditional instruments gives you more flexibility in how you construct a portfolio.
Another feature we noticed: TradeEU Global supports automated strategies. If you've been trading manually and want to experiment with deploying algo-driven setups, you don't need to leave the platform to do it.
TradeEU Global runs the familiar tiered model. Here's how it breaks down:

TradeEU Global operates under Tradesense Holding Ltd, registered in Mauritius (registration number 183967) with an additional office in Cyprus. They're regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius.
That said, TradeEU Global does publicly list its license details, legal entity name, and registered addresses across its site and legal documentation. That level of disclosure is more than some offshore brokers bother with.

Funding options on TradeEU Global are as follows:
No deposit fees from TradeEU Global's side (though your bank or payment provider may charge their own). Card deposits are processed instantly; bank wires take longer depending on your region. Withdrawals go through the same method you used to deposit and are processed within three business days.
The variety of options is good. Adding Apple Pay and Google Pay alongside traditional e-wallets means most traders should find at least one method that works for them without friction.
Customer support is available 24/5 through live chat, email, and phone — and they operate in English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish, French, German, and Italian. The website auto-selects your language based on your location, which is a small touch but tells you they're actually thinking about their global user base rather than just slapping an English-only FAQ page together and calling it a day.
TradeEU Global has been operating for more than 3 years, which gives it a real-world track record, not ancient, but not brand-new either. The TradingView integration makes the trading experience feel modern, the 350+ instrument range covers most strategies, and the multilingual support is legitimately useful if English isn't your first language.
Our take: open a demo account first. Spend a few days with the platform. Test the execution. If the conditions work for you, start small. And as with any broker — read the terms, understand the leverage risk, and don't deposit anything you'd panic about losing.
Crypto markets are pushing higher again, but this time the driver is not purely technical or crypto-native. Instead, a wave of political and macroeconomic developments is reshaping investor expectations — and injecting fresh liquidity hopes into the system.
Recent statements from Donald Trump suggest potential drastic changes at the Federal Reserve, including the possibility of removing Jerome Powell if he refuses to step down. At the same time, Trump hinted that interest rates would drop under a new Fed leadership.
Markets reacted instantly.
The logic driving both stocks and crypto is simple:
This explains why the S&P 500 has surged to new all-time highs, while risk assets — including Bitcoin and altcoins — continue climbing.
At the same time, Tesla saw its stock jump sharply, adding over $100 billion in market value in a single session. Small-cap stocks are also approaching breakout levels, reinforcing a broad risk-on environment.
👉 In short: markets are pricing in cheap money returning soon.
While the rally looks strong on the surface, it is being built on an unusually fragile foundation.
The growing tension between political leadership and the Federal Reserve introduces a serious risk: the potential loss of central bank independence.
If monetary policy becomes politically driven, several consequences could follow:
👉 This is not typical “bullish liquidity” — it’s forced liquidity driven by political pressure.
That distinction matters.
Despite the risks, crypto markets tend to react quickly — and positively — to any sign of increased liquidity.
Bitcoin and altcoins thrive in environments where:
Additionally, institutional narratives continue to strengthen. Morgan Stanley recently highlighted tokenization as a key future growth area, signaling that traditional finance is still moving toward blockchain integration.
👉 This creates a powerful short-term tailwind for crypto.
However, several developments suggest that this rally may not be stable:
At the same time, risk assets are rising even as uncertainty increases — a divergence that historically does not last long.
The biggest risk is not that markets are rising — it’s why they are rising.
If any of the following occur, the current momentum could reverse quickly:
👉 In that scenario, liquidity expectations could unwind just as fast as they formed.
Crypto markets are benefiting from a powerful narrative shift: the expectation of easier monetary policy. In the short term, this supports higher prices and continued momentum.
But this is not a typical bull run driver.
This rally is being fueled by political pressure, macro uncertainty, and fragile expectations — all of which can change rapidly.
For now, crypto is rising.
But the foundation beneath this move may be far less stable than it appears.
Two months after a New York federal judge ruled AI conversations can be seized by prosecutors, more than a dozen major law firms have issued warnings to clients.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage announced his backing of the company following its relaunch under the Stack BTC name in March.
Anthropic's new flagship model beat every benchmark we threw at it, eats tokens like a hungry teenager, and showed its reasoning out loud.
Charles Schwab President and CEO Rick Wurster indicated that America’s largest discount brokerage will likely support prediction markets.
Sports and war prediction markets and crypto-backed perpetual futures came under fire during a House committee hearing Thursday.
Financial services giant Charles Schwab is preparing to enter the spot cryptocurrency market in the coming weeks, but will it be able to compete with spot ETFs?.
The publicly traded developer behind the popular non-custodial software wallet, has announced a massive expansion of its XRP Ledger (XRPL) capabilities.
Robinhood records three billion Dogecoin (DOGE) withdrawal worth $294 million into an unknown new wallet just four days before "Doge Day" (4/20).
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirms a $150 million support plan for Drift Protocol, but it comes with a catch as Ardoino is demanding a shift to USDT from USDC.
Ripple's stablecoin, RLUSD, is listed on major crypto exchange Bitrue, allowing users to use the stablecoin as collateral on the platform.
Bet365 has been a household name in online gambling for over two decades. Launched in the UK in 2000, it grew into one of the largest betting platforms in the world, covering sports, casino, poker, and live dealer games. Millions of players use it, and its reputation is well established.
But a growing segment of players is looking elsewhere. The reasons are straightforward. Some want crypto payment options. Others are frustrated with slow withdrawals tied to traditional banking. Many feel that Bet365’s bonuses and loyalty rewards have not kept pace with what newer platforms are offering. The online gambling landscape is shifting, and players are paying attention.
One platform that keeps coming up in those searches is ZunaBet.
Bet365 is a regulated, well-funded operation. It holds licenses from the UK Gambling Commission and the Malta Gaming Authority, among others. Its sportsbook is deep, covering a wide range of markets with live streaming on select events. The casino section includes a reasonable selection of slots, table games, and live dealer titles.
Payment options at Bet365 are traditional — credit cards, bank transfers, PayPal, and selected e-wallets. Withdrawals can take anywhere from a few hours to several business days depending on the method.
Where Bet365 consistently receives pushback is around its bonus offers, which many players view as conservative, and its loyalty program, which lacks the depth that regular players are starting to expect. And if you want to deposit or withdraw in crypto, Bet365 does not support it.
ZunaBet entered the market in 2026 under Strathvale Group Ltd, operating with an Anjouan gaming license. Unlike platforms that added crypto as a secondary feature, ZunaBet was designed around it from day one.
The platform accepts more than 20 cryptocurrencies — BTC, ETH, USDT on multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and others. It charges no platform processing fees, and withdrawals are processed quickly thanks to the underlying crypto infrastructure. No banks, no card processors, no waiting around.

The game library is substantial. ZunaBet hosts over 11,000 titles from 63 providers including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Evolution, Yggdrasil, and BGaming. That covers slots, RNG table games, and a full live dealer section. In terms of sheer volume, it sits among the largest crypto-focused casino libraries currently available.
ZunaBet also operates a complete sportsbook. It covers football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other mainstream sports, alongside esports titles like CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant. Virtual sports and combat sports round out the offering, making it a true all-in-one platform.
The team behind ZunaBet has over 20 years of combined industry experience. The platform runs on modern HTML5 technology with a dark-themed, responsive design and dedicated apps for iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS. Live chat support is available around the clock.
The gap between crypto-native and fiat-based platforms goes beyond just currency options. It shapes the entire user experience.
At traditional platforms like Bet365, every transaction passes through banks, payment processors, or e-wallets. Each layer adds processing time, potential fees, and compliance steps. Deposits can be declined by banks that flag gambling transactions. Withdrawals can sit in queues for days.

At ZunaBet, transactions happen on-chain. Deposits land quickly. Withdrawals settle in minutes rather than days. Fees are lower because there are fewer intermediaries taking a cut. For players already comfortable with crypto, the difference in speed and simplicity is immediately noticeable.
This is not a niche preference anymore. Crypto adoption in online gambling has been growing steadily, and platforms built around it from scratch — rather than retrofitted — tend to deliver a cleaner experience. That is a core reason why players exploring Bet365 alternatives are landing on platforms like ZunaBet.
Bet365 runs promotions, but its bonus offers tend to be on the smaller side and often come with conditions that limit their practical value. The platform leans more on brand strength and product breadth than aggressive welcome offers.

ZunaBet goes bigger. New players can claim up to $5,000 in bonuses plus 75 free spins across their first three deposits. The breakdown is simple: a 100% match up to $2,000 plus 25 free spins on the first deposit, 50% up to $1,500 plus 25 spins on the second, and 100% up to $1,500 plus 25 spins on the third.
Spreading the bonus across three deposits encourages players to stay engaged rather than deposit once and disappear. In terms of raw value, ZunaBet’s welcome package is well above what most established operators offer.
Most traditional loyalty programs, including the one at Bet365, follow a familiar pattern — accumulate points, exchange them for modest rewards, repeat. For regular players, the returns often feel thin relative to their activity.
ZunaBet takes a completely different approach with its dragon evolution loyalty system. There are six tiers — Squire, Warden, Champion, Divine, Knight, and Ultimate — each with increasing rakeback percentages. Squire starts at 1% rakeback, and Ultimate reaches 20%. Along the way, players unlock free spins (up to 1,000 at the highest levels), VIP club access, double wheel spins, and progression through a gamified system centered on a dragon mascot called Zuno.

Twenty percent rakeback at the top tier is a significant return, especially for high-volume players. It gives consistent users a tangible reason to stay on the platform. Compared to the flat, uninspiring loyalty structures at most legacy operators, ZunaBet’s system stands out.
The online gambling industry does not stand still. Player expectations are changing. Faster payments, bigger rewards, wider game selections, and crypto compatibility are no longer fringe demands — they are becoming the baseline for a new wave of platforms.
Bet365 remains a major player with strong regulatory standing and a massive global reach. That is not in question. But it was built in a different era, and in the areas that matter most to today’s players — crypto support, withdrawal speed, bonus generosity, and loyalty rewards — newer platforms like ZunaBet are setting a higher bar.
ZunaBet combines over 11,000 games, a full sportsbook with esports coverage, support for 20+ cryptocurrencies, a welcome bonus worth up to $5,000, and a rakeback system reaching 20%. That is a lot of value packed into a single platform, and it is the kind of offering that turns first-time visitors into long-term users.
For players actively looking for something beyond Bet365 in 2026, ZunaBet is making a strong case for itself as one of the most complete crypto-first options on the market.
The post Bet365 Alternatives: Why ZunaBet Is on Every Player’s Radar in 2026 appeared first on Blockonomi.
The bitcoin price prediction is running hot after Strategy dropped $1 billion on 13,927 BTC in a single week, lifting total holdings to 780,897 coins and leaving the company just 19,103 BTC from the 800,000 mark, per CoinDesk. That kind of corporate conviction while the Fear and Greed Index sits at 12 tells you exactly where the biggest buyer on the planet expects this market to go next.
BTC hit $76,000 on April 14, its highest since mid-March, as short liquidations and geopolitical easing drove a sharp rally per Bloomberg. Strategy funded the entire buy through STRC preferred stock, and the ticker printed a record $1.16 billion in daily volume on April 13 per CoinDesk. Pepeto crossed $9.04 million raised at $0.0000001863 with 183% APY staking compounding daily, and every day this presale stays open is one day closer to the listing that changes this price forever.
Institutional demand through ETFs now absorbs more than 100% of Bitcoin’s newly mined annual supply, building a structural squeeze that Bitwise calls the main driver behind its bitcoin price prediction that BTC prints a new all-time high before 2026 ends.
Goldman Sachs filed for a Bitcoin Premium Income ETF on April 14, joining BlackRock in building yield products around BTC. When the bitcoin price prediction lines up this cleanly with corporate buying and Wall Street expansion, presale tokens with real tools are the ones that catch the biggest wave.
Pepeto stands as the best crypto to buy now after crossing $9.04 million raised while Bitcoin holds near $74,020 and the world’s largest corporate BTC holder keeps stacking during extreme fear.
Conviction keeps building because investors tracking the bitcoin price prediction understand the pattern. When BTC bounces off fear-driven dips, the altcoin wave that follows sends presale entries into return territory no big cap can reach.
The core problem Pepeto attacks is fragmentation. Traders jump between five or six platforms to bridge, swap, check contracts, and track positions, losing fees and time at every step. The exchange pulls all of that into one place.

From one dashboard, users bridge across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana at zero cost, run risk scores on any contract before committing capital, and track their full portfolio on a single screen. The zero-fee engine keeps every dollar productive instead of leaking through hidden charges.
The result is real tools powering smart decisions instead of guesswork across broken platforms. The bridge, risk scorer, token engine, and portfolio tracker all run on smart contracts verified by a SolidProof audit, giving a security base most presales never come close to building.
At $0.0000001863 right now, a $10,000 position earns roughly $18,300 in annual staking rewards at 183% APY, putting about $1,525 per month straight into your wallet while the listing draws closer. The cofounder who created the original Pepe coin built Pepeto to capture exactly this kind of moment. Buying presales while fear runs the market is how the biggest fortunes in crypto have always started, and the confirmed Binance listing on Pepeto means this entry price gets wiped out the moment the first trade clears.
Bitcoin (BTC) trades near $74,020 on April 15 per CoinMarketCap, after punching above $76,000 on April 14 for its highest print since the February crash that drove prices to $60,000. Bitwise holds firm on its bitcoin price prediction that BTC will break its $128,198 all-time high before this year closes.

Every major desk keeps lifting its bitcoin price prediction, but BTC still needs to nearly double to reach those targets. By the time it arrives, every wallet that locked in Pepeto at six zeros will already hold returns that large-cap buyers would need years to match.
Every signal right now points to the same outcome. The bitcoin price prediction turning bullish, Strategy loading $1 billion in BTC during peak fear, Goldman Sachs filing a Bitcoin ETF, and the exchange infrastructure that merged meme energy with real trading tools standing ready to capture the full move.
The wealth built this cycle will belong to the people who found the tools, the builder, and the timing behind Pepeto before anyone else showed up. Visit the Pepeto official website today because the listing gets closer with every passing hour and the entry you see right now disappears the moment trading goes live.

What is the bitcoin price prediction for 2026 and can presale tokens outperform BTC?
Bitwise and Standard Chartered both project Bitcoin will break its all-time high this year, roughly 2x from current levels. Presale tokens with confirmed listings and working tools historically deliver far larger multiples, and Pepeto at $0.0000001863 sits at that exact entry point.
Will Bitcoin (BTC) break its all-time high of $128,198 before 2026 ends?
Bitwise projects Bitcoin (BTC) will top $128,198 before December 2026, backed by ETF inflows absorbing over 100% of newly mined supply. Strategy’s $1 billion weekly purchase and 780,897 BTC total stack add corporate weight to that call.
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction Flips Bullish After Strategy Loads $1 Billion in BTC but Pepeto Is the Best Crypto to Buy Now appeared first on Blockonomi.
Big opportunities are lining up in crypto right now, and the smart money is already paying attention. The XRP price prediction models are pointing to a critical support test that could either trigger a historic breakout or a sharp correction. The Ethereum price forecast 2026 is also getting a vote of confidence from institutional buyers who are loading up on ETH despite sitting on heavy losses.
But while these names draw attention, the top crypto gainers’ conversation keeps circling back to BlockDAG. With a 195x return potential at current fixed pricing, an expanding Tier-1 exchange footprint, and a packed roadmap through mid-2026, it’s giving established names a run for their money. Let’s break down which is the best pick for this quarter.
The XRP price prediction models suggest the token is at a critical crossroads, with the $1.27 support level holding firm inside a descending channel while long-term trendlines hint at a potential breakout. Short-term momentum remains cautious, but derivatives data show rising net long positions, signaling growing trader confidence.

Analysts point to a possible third retest of XRP’s multi-year ascending trendline, a pattern that historically preceded major rallies. Long-term targets between $8 and $27 are being discussed, though macro confirmation is needed. This XRP price prediction ultimately hinges on whether current support holds or a deeper correction takes over.
Ethereum price forecast 2026 is looking cautiously optimistic. BitMine, a company that holds ETH as a treasury asset, just bought another 71,524 ETH last week, pushing their total to nearly 4.87 million ETH, about 4% of all ETH in circulation. That’s a massive bet on Ethereum’s future, even though their holdings are currently sitting at a $6.4 billion loss.

The price is hovering around $2,250, bouncing off key technical support levels in the mid-$2,100s. The next big test is breaking above $2,351. If that happens, $2,746 could be the next stop.
When looking at the Ethereum price forecast 2026, momentum indicators suggest there’s room to climb, but don’t expect a straight shot up; consolidation is likely before any major breakout. BitMine’s continued buying despite losses signals long-term confidence in ETH’s value.
Not every crypto that gains does so with substance behind it. BlockDAG is different, and the numbers are starting to reflect that. BlockDAG’s native token is currently available at $0.000000726 through its direct portal, a price that, when stacked against the token’s current market value on CoinMarketCap, signals an instant 195x return. Plus, the coin has already hit an all-time high of $0.40, offering a glimpse at the genuine market demand.
And that demand is soaring by the day, thanks to the robust infrastructure behind it. The tech foundation speaks for itself: a DAG-based chain running 10,000+ TPS, over $1 billion transferred on-chain, 2-second consensus speeds, millions of blocks already produced, and close to 2 billion tokens staked.

The exchange footprint has expanded sharply, too. BDAG is now live on XT.com, LBank, BitMart, Coinstore, Biconomy, Ascendex, and P2B. On top of this, BingX, a Tier 1 exchange, has just gone live, and three more Tier 1 platforms are following closely behind. More exchange access means more buyers, more liquidity, and more price discovery.
Add a roadmap that includes full exchange coverage by late April, DEX and LP incentives in May, and a Super App with lending, oracles, and dApps by June, and you have a project with both current execution and a credible growth path.
With today’s entry at $0.000000726, and analysts projecting $1 by 2026, current buyers are in line for gains that are impossible to find elsewhere right now. Savvy buyers are rushing in now, knowing that opportunities like this don’t come by often.
Both the XRP price prediction and the Ethereum price forecast 2026 tell a story of assets with real potential but real uncertainty attached. XRP needs macro confirmation before those $8–$27 targets come into play, and Ethereum still has key resistance levels to clear before any sustained rally. For traders who don’t mind playing the waiting game, both are worth keeping on the radar.
However, for anyone seeking top crypto gainers with clear ROI potential right now, BlockDAG is the obvious choice. A fixed portal price of $0.000000726, a 195x return potential, 10,000+ TPS, nearly 2 billion tokens staked, and Tier-1 exchange listings arriving back to back, it checks every single box.
And with analysts projecting $1 by 2026, the window at current pricing won’t stay open forever. Once the market takes control, latecomers could pay almost 200x more for the same position they could lock in today.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network
Website: https://blockdag.network
Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial
Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu
The post XRP Stalls, ETH Strengthens, and BlockDAG Breaks Into 2026’s Top Crypto Gainers With 195x ROI Potential! appeared first on Blockonomi.
Broadcom is experiencing an exceptional April performance that ranks among its strongest since the company’s public debut. The semiconductor powerhouse has witnessed a remarkable 28% increase this month, positioning this rally as one of the top three monthly advances since Avago, as it was formerly known, completed its IPO in 2009.
Broadcom Inc., AVGO
By midday Thursday, AVGO was changing hands at approximately $397.78, reflecting a modest 0.3% intraday gain. The shares are now within striking distance of their all-time peak of $412.97, established in December 2025.
The stock has now posted gains for eight straight sessions. Data from Dow Jones Market Data indicates this represents the company’s most extended positive streak since December 2023.
The semiconductor industry broadly has provided favorable conditions. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF has advanced 19% throughout April, bouncing back from earlier weakness related to Middle East geopolitical uncertainty following coordinated U.S. and Israeli military operations against Iran.
However, Broadcom has generated its own momentum through strategic business developments.
Throughout April, Broadcom revealed expanded and fresh partnerships with Google, Meta, and artificial intelligence company Anthropic. The Anthropic agreement alone encompasses 3.5 gigawatts of advanced compute infrastructure designed to support Anthropic’s Claude AI model development.
Wall Street responded swiftly to these announcements. Following the Google and Anthropic partnership revelations, UBS elevated its medium-term projections for Broadcom, now anticipating the company will deliver 7 million tensor processing unit (TPU) accelerators during 2027. This represents an upward revision from their previous 6 million unit forecast.
UBS maintained its Buy rating on AVGO alongside a $475 price objective, suggesting the agreements position Broadcom as a central player in what analysts described as the “billion-dollar revenue story” surrounding AI infrastructure expansion.
Among 54 analysts monitored by FactSet, 51 have assigned Broadcom a Buy rating or its equivalent. The consensus 12-month price target stands at $465.55, implying approximately 17% potential appreciation from present trading levels.
BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya substantially revised his semiconductor sector outlook this month, elevating the 2026 revenue projection to $1.3 trillion. This represents a dramatic $300 billion increase compared to forecasts issued merely four months earlier.
Arya boosted his growth estimate for the non-memory semiconductor segment to 25% for 2026, up from a previous 22% projection. He identified AI data center infrastructure demand as the fundamental catalyst.
Broadcom was specifically highlighted as a key contributor to the upwardly revised industry forecast.
The stock’s April performance puts it in exclusive territory within the company’s trading history. Since 2009, only two other months have delivered stronger returns. If the current momentum continues, this could become an even more significant achievement before month-end.
As of Thursday’s session, AVGO trades just under 4% beneath its record closing high.
The post Broadcom (AVGO) Stock Climbs 28% on Major AI Partnerships With Tech Giants appeared first on Blockonomi.
Multiple high-growth technology companies face important near-term catalysts this week, driven by quarterly earnings releases and strategic product launches. Taiwan Semiconductor, Netflix, Nvidia, ServiceNow, and AMD each present distinct yet interconnected investment narratives spanning semiconductors, enterprise software, and streaming media.
Netflix releases its fiscal first-quarter 2026 financial performance on April 16. Market participants are particularly focused on subscriber acquisition trends, progress in advertising revenue streams, and forward guidance from company leadership.
Netflix, Inc., NFLX
Significant growth opportunities remain through the platform’s advertising-supported membership option and continued international market penetration. Quarterly reports from this streaming giant frequently influence broader sentiment across the communications services industry.
TSMC unveiled Q1 2026 financial results on April 16. Top-line revenue advanced 35.1% versus the year-ago period, with bottom-line net income and diluted earnings per share both surging 58.3%.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, TSM
These figures underscore robust ongoing demand for artificial intelligence semiconductor products. Taiwan Semiconductor’s quarterly performance serves as a critical barometer for the overall chip manufacturing industry.
Nvidia captured headlines on April 14 through the introduction of NVIDIA Ising. The chipmaker characterized this development as the first publicly available AI model framework designed to accelerate practical quantum computing deployments.
This announcement provides an additional product-driven catalyst for a stock already positioned at the epicenter of AI infrastructure investment. The move demonstrates Nvidia’s strategic ambition to expand beyond training processors into comprehensive computing ecosystems.
AMD won’t publish earnings until May 5, yet the company maintains prominent positioning on this week’s watchlist. Semiconductor equities react sharply to emerging indicators regarding artificial intelligence demand dynamics and competitive market standing.
AMD’s substantial presence in data center infrastructure and AI acceleration hardware ensures sustained investor attention. As market participants evaluate chip manufacturers based on technology capabilities and revenue trajectories, AMD consistently ranks among the top stocks monitored for appreciation potential.
ServiceNow prepares to announce Q1 2026 financial results on April 22. The enterprise software provider specializes in AI-enhanced automation and workflow management solutions for corporate customers, with investors eager to assess whether business technology budgets continue expanding.
ServiceNow addresses a substantial addressable market where artificial intelligence capabilities can justify increased per-customer spending. Solid quarterly performance would strengthen the investment thesis that enterprise software represents a sustainable growth category.
This week’s high-growth stock compilation centers on two dominant market narratives: artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout and enterprise software adoption. Taiwan Semiconductor’s previously announced Q1 performance—featuring 35.1% revenue expansion and 58.3% earnings growth—established a positive benchmark early in the week.
Investors face numerous important catalysts this week across semiconductor, software, and media sectors. Taiwan Semiconductor has already posted impressive quarterly figures, Netflix reports Thursday, with ServiceNow following the subsequent week. Nvidia and AMD maintain elevated visibility as the artificial intelligence infrastructure investment theme continues propelling the chip sector forward.
The post High-Growth Technology Stocks in the Spotlight: Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM), Nvidia (NVDA), and AMD Lead This Week appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin’s near-term direction may hinge less on Fed policy than on which four war scenarios play out in the Middle East.
This is according to Maelstrom’s chief investment officer, Arthur Hayes, who published a detailed breakdown this week, arguing that the US-Iran conflict, now almost seven weeks in, has created a trading environment so uncertain his fund “did f*ck all” in the first quarter.
Everything in Hayes’s analysis comes down to one question: what happens to ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz? He mapped out four possible outcomes, dismissing a nuclear escalation scenario upfront as “un-investable” and not worth writing about.
The first scenario, which he dubbed “Back to Normal,” is less bullish than it sounds. Here, the war ends, shipping resumes, but the AI-driven deflationary pressure on Western knowledge workers stays in play.
According to Hayes, banks holding customer credit would face a slow-motion solvency problem as white-collar layoffs spread, something he illustrated with a story about a crypto-gaming entrepreneur who, after experimenting with the latest Claude model over Christmas 2025, automated enough of his engineering workflow to cut 50% of his staff within weeks.
Until the Fed moves to address the resulting credit losses, Hayes says BTC could bounce to $80,000 or $90,000, but does not warrant an aggressive buy.
The second scenario centers on Iran restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz and charging a toll. According to Hayes, this could push countries to sell dollar assets, buy gold, and acquire Chinese yuan to settle trades. That shift, if it accelerates, would weigh on US bonds and equities, and Bitcoin, in his view, would likely struggle at first as investors reduce risk exposure, before recovering once central banks step in with fresh liquidity.
A variation of the above scenario came into focus after Trump announced on April 12 that the US Navy would block all ships entering or leaving the Strait. Here, Hayes said markets should focus less on political rhetoric and more on oil futures spreads to gauge whether supply disruptions are real.
The fourth, “The Empire Strikes Back,” has the US military destroying Iran’s ability to block the Strait entirely. The problem, as Hayes sees it, is that Iran has promised to take the rest of the Gulf’s energy production down with it if it goes. That would force central banks everywhere to print money regardless, while raising the probability of a wider conflict.
One thread runs through all four scenarios: Hayes believes Bitcoin’s price is determined by the quantity of money in existence, not its cost.
Even if central banks raise rates to fight food and energy inflation, governments will need to borrow heavily for defense and commodity stockpiling. If private buyers won’t absorb that debt, central and commercial banks will, expanding the money supply anyway. That hurts cash-flow-dependent assets while helping Bitcoin and gold.
The cryptocurrency itself was trading around $75,000 at the time of writing, up about 5% over the past seven days and outperforming the broader crypto market’s roughly 4% gain in the same period.
The post Arthur Hayes Breaks Down Bitcoin’s Fate in Four Iran War Outcomes appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Pi Network’s PI has been trading in a tight range between $0.16 and $0.17 since the start of the month, far below the local top seen in March.
According to some of the most popular AI-powered chatbots, the price may be on the verge of a substantial surge in the remaining weeks of April, while certain on-chain indicators support the bullish outlook.
ChatGPT envisioned two potential scenarios. The first one favors the bulls and calls for a price increase to as high as $0.30, a level described as “the absolute optimistic ceiling” for this month. However, the chatbot claimed that a pump of that magnitude would require a major catalyst, such as a listing on a leading crypto exchange.
Recall that a similar event prompted PI’s brief rise above $0.30 last month. Back then, Kraken offered trading services for the coin and sparked huge enthusiasm across the community.
The second option is more pessimistic and classified as more likely. Specifically, ChatGPT predicted a possible pullback toward $0.12, driven by limited demand outside the core community and still-developing real-world use cases.
Grok, the chatbot integrated into the social media platform X, was even more bearish. It suggested that the maximum realistic price PI can reach in April is $0.22 and argued that the upside potential would heavily depend on the advancement of Pi Network’s ecosystem. Google’s Gemini made a similar forecast:
“In my opinion, the maximum PI can realistically reach in the remainder of April 2026 is $0.22, but it would require a perfect storm of technical success and market sentiment.”
Perplexity was the most optimistic chatbot (from the ones we consulted), envisioning a significant surge later this month. It claimed that “a stretch spike above $1 is possible only in a very aggressive, low-probability scenario,” but suggested that a jump to $0.40 is not out of the cards.
Some on-chain metrics signal that a revival may indeed be knocking on the door. The upcoming token unlocks, for instance, are scheduled to be quite substantial over the next few days, but towards the end of April, they are expected to slow down, thus reducing selling pressure.

PI’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) should also be observed. The technical analysis tool measures the speed and magnitude of recent price changes to give traders an idea about potential trend reversals. It ranges from 0 to 100, where anything below 30 indicates that the token is oversold and could be due for a rebound. Conversely, readings above 70 are interpreted as bearish territory. Currently, PI’s RSI stands at roughly 33 on a weekly scale.

The post Can Pi Network (PI) Resurrect in April and How High Can It Go: 4 AIs Make Shocking Predictions appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin’s price ascent came to an end minutes ago as the asset was rejected at $75,000 and pushed south by two grand in minutes.
The notable price decline came after the US jobs report for the past week came out, which was actually quite positive.
The US Labor Department announced minutes ago that initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 11,000 to a seasonally adjusted 207,000 for the week that ended on April 11. The forecasts were slightly higher at around 215,000 claims.
Layoffs remain relatively low, but the war with Iran could be hindering hiring, reads a Reuters report.
“At some point, elevated energy costs and prices for materials will cause firms to lay off marginal workers to protect profit margins. Just keep in mind that in the 1973 oil shock, it took about three months for claims to start to rise in any meaningful way,” commented High Frequency Economics’s chief economist, Carl Weinberg.
Although this news is somewhat positive, BTC’s price dipped immediately after the report went live. The cryptocurrency traded at $75,000 but dumped to $73,200 in minutes before it rebounded slightly to $73,700.
The liquidations jumped immediately as most alts followed suit with similar moves. In the past hour alone, over $120 million worth of longs and shorts have been wrecked, with the former dominating. On a daily scale, the total value is up to $350 million.
Almost 140,000 traders have been wrecked in the past day, with the single-largest liquidation taking place on Binance, and it was worth nearly $10 million.

The post Over $120M Wrecked in 1 Hour as BTC Dumps Hard After US Jobs Report appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin (BTC) has staged a notable recovery over the past 14 days, with its price hovering around $75,000.
One of the cryptocurrency’s early supporters, though, warned that the bottom of the cycle is yet to be reached, predicting a major crash ahead.
Davinci Jeremie – the early Bitcoin advocate who went viral in 2013 for urging people to buy BTC at $1 – is among the latest crypto commentators to sound the alarm of a potential price crisis.
He found similarities between the dump this February, when the asset’s valuation suddenly plummeted below $60,000 to the one from June 2022. Later on, the analyst alerted traders and investors that “the max pain isn’t in yet,” foreseeing one capitulation event like the FTX crash before BTC tumbles to its cycle low.
The meltdown of the once-leading crypto exchange occurred in November 2022 and triggered a broader market collapse, massive liquidations, and reputational damage to the entire industry. BTC, for instance, briefly nosedived under $16,000.
X user Chiefy also made a bearish forecast, claiming that the asset could soon tumble to the $35,000-$38,000 range. For their part, Doctor Profit described the asset’s resurgence as “a large trap for the bulls,” arguing that the real question now is how high the valuation can climb before a sharp correction sets in.
The renowned analyst Ali Martinez added his name to the long list of people discussing Bitcoin’s performance as of late. He believes the asset is at “a make-or-break” point, claiming that for the third time in six months, BTC is testing the 100-day simple moving average (SMA) as resistance.
He reminded that in October (right after the formation of that pattern) the price plunged by 30%. A similar thing happened at the start of the year when the valuation plunged by 39%.
“Today: We are testing this exact level again. A third rejection here would be a major structural failure. It could trigger a triple top effect, potentially sending Bitcoin back down to the yearly low at $59,800,” Martinez said.
At the same time, the analyst claimed that closing above the 100-day SMA could open “a direct path” toward $80,000-$84,000 and confirm that “the macro correction might be over.”
The recent whale activity and the declining amount of coins stored on exchanges support the bullish scenario. Large investors have acquired 10,000 BTC (worth roughly $750 million at current rates) over the last 96 hours: a move that could stimulate smaller players to follow suit.
Meanwhile, there are now fewer than 2.7 million coins situated on centralized exchanges, representing the lowest level since 2019. Such a development shows strong investor conviction and reduces immediate selling pressure.

The post Bitcoin (BTC) Rebounds 12% in 2 Weeks, Yet Analyst Believes The ‘Max Pain’ Could be on the Way appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin is trading around $74.7k, holding near its highest levels since the February breakdown, as the recovery momentum built over the past two weeks continues to develop.
The move is encouraging, but BTC now stands at one of the most technically important junctures of the entire correction, near the confluence of the descending channel’s upper boundary and the 100-day moving average, two levels that have defined the bearish structure for months.
For the first time in this correction cycle, BTC appears to be pressing a genuine breakout attempt above the descending channel, with the price now breaking above the upper boundary near $74k–$75k alongside the declining 100-day MA nearby. The RSI has also climbed into the high-60s, which is the strongest daily momentum reading since before the February crash, and is lending some credibility to the attempt, while also not showing overbought signals.
Whether this becomes a confirmed breakout or another failed one depends on how the price behaves over the next few daily closes. A sustained close above the channel and the $75k–$80k resistance band would be a structural shift of real significance, and would open a path toward $88k–$90k, where the 200-day MA awaits. On the downside, $60k–$62k is the key support that buyers should defend at all costs if the breakout fails.

On the 4-hour chart, BTC continues to trade inside the mildly ascending channel that has been in place since the February lows. The price has now risen above the midline and is attempting to break above the $74-$76k resistance zone. The 4-hour RSI is also hovering near 60s, which leaves room for a further push without the immediate threat of an RSI-driven rejection like those seen in prior attempts.
A clean breakout above $76k with the RSI holding above 60 would be a compelling short-term bullish signal and could accelerate a run toward the $80k–$82k zone. If the asset stalls and pulls back from here, the recent low near $71k is the first support to watch, followed by the lower boundary of the channel at $67k.

Bitcoin’s exchange reserves have fallen to approximately 2.68M BTC. It is at its lowest level in the entire dataset, stretching back to mid-2023, and a dramatic decline from the 3.2M BTC peak seen in early 2024. The drawdown has been steep and consistent, accelerating through the second half of 2025 and continuing even as the price corrected sharply from the $125k peak.
The significance of this reading is hard to overstate. With less Bitcoin sitting on exchanges than at any point in recent history, the immediately available sell-side supply is structurally thinner than it has been throughout the past 3 years, including the periods when BTC was trading at much lower prices. In a scenario where demand returns with conviction, the lack of exchange-side supply could amplify upward price moves significantly.
The setup mirrors conditions seen ahead of previous recoveries, where a tightening supply base combined with improving sentiment created the conditions for outsized moves. The key missing ingredient, as always, is the sustained demand. But the foundation being built on-chain is among the most constructive in years.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Here’s Why the Next Few Days Will Be Crucial for BTC appeared first on CryptoPotato.