The diminishing odds of a ceasefire highlight the deepening geopolitical instability and the challenges of achieving diplomatic resolutions.

The post Odds of US-Iran ceasefire by April 7 drop to 1% amid escalating tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Escalating tensions could destabilize the region, impacting global markets and diplomatic relations, with traders showing increased skepticism.

The post Iran warns of regional chaos for US if tensions escalate, ceasefire odds drop appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The rise in "wrench attacks" highlights the urgent need for enhanced security measures and privacy for those in the crypto industry.

The post AI firm leader robbed at knifepoint, says attackers sought crypto appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Rising regional hostilities and market pessimism highlight the diminishing prospects for diplomatic resolutions in the near term.

The post Ceasefire odds drop to 1% as protests erupt in Tel Aviv amid escalating tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Escalating tensions and protests in Tel Aviv diminish hopes for a near-term diplomatic breakthrough, impacting ceasefire prospects significantly.

The post Ceasefire odds tumble as protests in Tel Aviv escalate tensions: FT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account

Financial services giant Charles Schwab is preparing to expand deeper into digital assets, announcing plans for a forthcoming product that will allow clients to buy and sell cryptocurrencies directly through its platform.

The firm revealed that “Schwab Crypto” is in development and will be offered through Charles Schwab Premier Bank, positioning the product as a gateway for retail investors seeking direct exposure to leading cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. The company has opened a waitlist for clients interested in early access, though availability will be subject to regulatory approval and eligibility requirements.

The move marks a notable shift for Schwab, which until now has limited crypto exposure to indirect investment vehicles. Currently, clients can access digital asset markets through exchange-traded products (ETPs), crypto-related equities, and thematic funds. Examples include publicly traded firms like Coinbase, MicroStrategy, and Riot Platforms, as well as funds tied to blockchain and crypto industry performance.

All aboard the Charles Schwab Bitcoin train

Schwab’s entry into spot trading places it in more direct competition with established crypto platforms such as Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull. 

CEO Rick Wurster first signaled the firm’s intent to enter spot crypto markets in late 2024, citing expectations for a shifting regulatory environment under the administration of Donald Trump. The company has since positioned itself to move once conditions allowed for broader participation by traditional financial institutions.

Schwab is also preparing additional crypto-related products, including a potential stablecoin offering following the passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill.

A recent report from Charles Schwab found that Bitcoin volatility has declined significantly, with historical volatility falling to 42% in 2025 — about half its 2021 level — making it comparable to or lower than major tech stocks like Tesla and Nvidia. 

Despite fewer extreme swings, bitcoin still experiences sharp drawdowns, including a 32% drop in 2025 and a 50% peak-to-trough decline over three years. 

Long term, volatility remains elevated versus traditional assets. The report suggests bitcoin is maturing as it integrates into mainstream finance, with growing institutional adoption and ETF developments signaling increased acceptance.

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.

This post Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement

Tech entrepreneur and longtime Bitcoin advocate Jack Dorsey sparked excitement in the BTC community on Friday when he posted a link to a new page titled “Bitcoin Day | Earn Free Bitcoin.”

The post quotes an announcement from the “Bitcoin at Block” account stating that “The bitcoin faucet is back” on April 6, 2026, with a link to btc.day. Dorsey’s shared URL (hosted on AWS CloudFront) currently displays only the bold headline promoting free BTC on “Bitcoin Day,” with a countdown timer. 

No further details were given. 

In 2010, a site known as the Bitcoin Faucet gave visitors 5 BTC after they completed a simple captcha challenge. This was done to help spread awareness and use of BTC, which at the time was a new digital currency with almost no market value.

The site was created by Gavin Andresen, a software developer who later became one of BTC’s lead developers. Andresen loaded the faucet with his own BTC to distribute to visitors who solved the CAPTCHA.

Over the months the faucet operated, it handed out about 19,700 BTC in total. At today’s prices, that amount would be worth in the billions of dollars.

Bitcoin’s rough price performance

Over the past six months, BTC has experienced one of its weakest performance periods in years, with the price declining sharply from late 2025 highs. According to price history data, BTC’s value is down roughly 50% over the last half-year, reflecting a significant drawdown from levels above $120,000 in November 2025 to around the mid-$60,000s today.

BTC’s retreat has erased gains made earlier in the cycle and marked its worst six-month streak since 2018, driven by a mix of macroeconomic headwinds and reduced risk appetite among investors.

In March, it seems like the price stabilized near the high $60,000s, with market participants watching key technical levels and macro signals for clues on the next move. 

Block has held 8,883 BTC since October 6, 2020, currently worth about $593.74 million at an average cost of $32,939 per BTC, for a gain of roughly +102.92% at today’s prices.

The company, trading under ticker XYZ, has a market cap of about $36–$37 billion. At the time of writing, BTC is trading near $67,000.

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.

This post Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor

Nearly six months after the Oct. 10 flash crypto crash erased millions of dollars in a single day, Bitcoin remains under pressure, trading well below its recent peak. The asset reached an all-time high of $126,080 on Oct. 6, but has since fallen about 47% to roughly $67,000.

Despite the drawdown, Cathie Wood, a long-time BTC advocate and chief executive of ARK Investment Management, is urging investors to maintain a long-term perspective.

Wood, whose firm was among the first publicly listed asset managers to gain exposure to Bitcoin in 2015, has maintained an active presence in crypto-related equities. ARK Invest continues to trade shares of companies tied to the digital asset sector, including Coinbase, Robinhood Markets, Block, Circle Internet Group, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, and Bullish, adjusting positions in response to market conditions.

In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Wood addressed the current downturn, framing the magnitude of BTC’s decline as a sign of maturation rather than weakness. 

She argued that a roughly 50% drop from peak levels represents a shift from the extreme volatility seen in earlier cycles, when Bitcoin routinely experienced drawdowns of 85% to 95%.

According to Wood, such severe collapses are unlikely to recur. She described Bitcoin as a “proven technology” and a “new asset class,” suggesting that its market behavior has evolved alongside broader adoption and institutional participation. 

In her view, the current correction would be considered a “real victory” within the Bitcoin community if losses remain limited to around half of its peak value.

Bitcoin’s vicious cycles

Historical data supports the comparison to prior cycles, though the current downturn has yet to match earlier bear markets in severity. During the 2021–2022 cycle, Bitcoin fell nearly 80% from its then-record high of about $69,000, eventually bottoming near $15,600. 

Onchain data from Glassnode indicates that the present decline, measured against the October 2025 high, has reached roughly 52% at its lowest point.

All this is happening as bitcoin’s price decline forces a growing number of public companies and sovereign entities to unwind their BTC treasuries, marking a sharp reversal from the accumulation trend of the past two years. Firms that once championed long-term holding are now selling to manage liquidity, repay debt, and fund strategic pivots.

Companies like Riot Platforms, Genius Group, Empery Digital, Nakamoto Holdings, and Marathon Digital have all reduced holdings, in some cases significantly. Marathon alone sold over 15,000 BTC for $1.1 billion to cut debt, while Genius Group fully exited its position. Riot has also been offloading bitcoin as it shifts focus toward AI and high-performance computing infrastructure.

Even firms still committed to bitcoin are trimming reserves. Empery Digital sold part of its holdings to repay loans, while Nakamoto Holdings liquidated a smaller portion to support operations. Meanwhile, Bhutan has been reducing its state-backed bitcoin reserves after previously accumulating through mining.

Despite the sell-off, public companies still collectively hold about 1.16 million BTC, over 5% of the total supply. 

This post Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure

Riot Platforms sold 3,778 bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026, generating $289.5 million and marking a shift in strategy as the miner redirects capital toward infrastructure and high-performance computing.

The volume sold exceeded the company’s quarterly production of 1,473 BTC by roughly 2.6 times, signaling a drawdown of treasury holdings rather than routine profit-taking. Riot ended the quarter with 15,680 BTC, down 18% from 18,005 BTC at the close of 2025.

The selling appears to have extended beyond the reporting period. Blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence flagged a 500 BTC outflow from a wallet linked to Riot following the end of the quarter, suggesting continued liquidation activity.

The imbalance between production and sales comes as Riot accelerates its expansion into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing colocation. The company has begun repositioning its business model away from sole reliance on bitcoin mining, seeking to monetize its energy assets and data center footprint through long-term infrastructure contracts.

In January, Riot sold 1,080 BTC to fund the purchase of 200 acres at its Rockdale, Texas site. It also entered a ten-year agreement with Advanced Micro Devices to provide 25 megawatts of capacity, with an option to scale to 200 MW. The deal is expected to generate about $311 million in contract revenue over its initial term.

Operational metrics complicate a distress narrative. Riot reduced its all-in power cost to 3.0 cents per kilowatt hour, a 21% decline from the prior year, while increasing deployed hash rate by 26% to 42.5 exahashes per second. Average operating hash rate rose 23% to 36.4 EH/s, reflecting continued investment in mining capacity.

The company also generated $21 million in power credits during the quarter, more than double the year-ago period, through participation in grid services and energy programs.

Bitcoin HODLers like RIOT are selling

Industry conditions remain a factor. Rising energy costs tied to geopolitical tensions have pressured margins across the mining sector, prompting several operators to liquidate holdings. MARA Holdings, Genius Group, and Nakamoto Holdings collectively sold more than 15,000 BTC in recent days, reflecting a broader shift in capital allocation.

Riot’s Q1 activity underscores a turning point for the sector, where bitcoin reserves are deployed as funding sources for diversification rather than held as long-term balance sheet assets.

The trend extends beyond corporate treasuries. Bhutan has continued to reduce its BTC holdings, selling a total of 3,103 BTC. A single transaction on March 30 accounted for 375 BTC, according to Glassnode data. 

The country had built its position through state-backed mining operations, reaching more than 13,000 BTC at its peak in October 2024.

Despite the recent selling, public companies still hold about 1.16 million BTC, or more than 5% of bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net.

This post Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor

There is a version of the Bitcoin treasury conversation that has become almost routine at this point. Bitcoin is hard money. Fiat debases. Companies that hold Bitcoin on their balance sheet are making a rational long-term decision. All of this is true, and none of it is the interesting question anymore.

The interesting question is structural. Not should a company hold Bitcoin, but what kind of company should hold it, and what that choice implies for how the company performs across a full market cycle, not just a favorable one.

Three models have emerged. Each reflects a different level of conviction, a different capital structure, and a different set of tradeoffs.

• The pure-play. A company whose primary purpose is accumulating Bitcoin through capital raises, financial engineering, etc, with no core operating business. Lean structure, singular mission.

• The digital credit issuer. The most sophisticated expression of the pure-play thesis. These companies issue Bitcoin-backed financial instruments, preferred stock, convertible notes, and similar products, to fund continued accumulation. At scale, this creates a compounding accumulation engine that simpler models cannot match.
• The operating company with a Bitcoin treasury. A business with real revenue, real clients, and operational activity, which holds Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset in deliberate strategic relationship with the business itself.

All three are legitimate expressions of the Bitcoin treasury thesis. They are not optimized for the same objectives, and the differences matter more than most treasury conversations acknowledge.

What pure-play gets right

The pure-play case deserves genuine treatment because its strongest version has real force.

Financial engineering pure-plays are capital-efficient in a specific and important sense: every dollar raised goes directly to Bitcoin accumulation with no operational drag. The mission is singular and the structure reflects it. For investors, this creates clarity. Allocators know exactly what they are underwriting, direct Bitcoin exposure at the corporate level, and the investment thesis is legible and short.

The digital credit model extends this further. Companies that have successfully issued preferred instruments and Bitcoin-backed products have built accumulation engines that operating businesses cannot match on a per-dollar-raised basis. The compounding effect of a sophisticated capital structure, at scale, is genuinely powerful. It represents the fullest expression of the Bitcoin treasury thesis, and the destination it points toward is one every operator in this space should understand.

The prerequisite problem and what it means in practice

The digital credit model has a prerequisite that is rarely stated plainly: it requires scale, institutional credibility, and market infrastructure that most companies building a Bitcoin treasury today do not yet have. It is a destination, not a starting point.

The path there runs through an intermediate period where the financial engineering structure carries more exposure than is often acknowledged. During that period:

• There is no operating revenue to fall back on
• The ability to raise capital tracks closely with Bitcoin market sentiment
• Strategic options narrow when conditions are not favorable
• The company’s cost structure depends entirely on capital markets remaining open

This is not a criticism of the model. It is a description of the journey. The question for executives is what structure best serves the company while that journey is underway.

What the operating company model actually provides

The operating company with a Bitcoin treasury does not accumulate Bitcoin faster than a well-run pure-play. At meaningful treasury scale, operating cash flow is not moving the needle on accumulation. The advantage is different, and worth stating precisely.

An operating business generates revenue independently of where Bitcoin is trading. That revenue covers fixed costs, which means the company is not dependent on capital markets remaining open to fund its basic operations. It can continue hiring, serving clients, and accumulating at a measured pace without being forced into capital decisions driven by timing rather than conviction.

The compounding effect works like this:

• Operating revenue covers costs and preserves the Bitcoin position through the cycle rather than drawing it down under pressure
• A preserved balance sheet improves the terms on future capital raises, lower dilution, better access to facilities, stronger negotiating position with partners
• Operational credibility widens the available capital base by providing an investment thesis that reaches allocators who cannot underwrite pure Bitcoin exposure within their current mandates

None of these mechanisms make Bitcoin accumulate faster in favorable conditions. Together, they make the company more durable across the full range of conditions it will face.

The built-in valuation floor

Most Bitcoin treasury company valuations are driven by a single number: mNAV, the premium the market assigns to Bitcoin held at the corporate level. When sentiment is strong and capital is flowing into the space, that premium expands. When the narrative cools, it compresses. The valuation moves with the market’s appetite for Bitcoin exposure, not with anything the company is doing operationally.

The operating company model introduces a second component that behaves differently. A profitable operating business carries an earnings multiple underwritten by revenue, client relationships, and operational track record. It does not expand dramatically when Bitcoin is performing. But it does not compress when sentiment turns either. It is stable in a way that mNAV alone is not.

These two components, Bitcoin NAV and an earnings multiple on the operating business, do not move together. That is the point. When mNAV compresses, the earnings multiple holds. The company retains a defensible valuation floor that a pure-play structure, with a single-component valuation entirely dependent on sentiment, does not have.

In practice this matters in three specific ways:

• Capital raises. A company with a defensible valuation floor can raise capital on reasonable terms even when Bitcoin sentiment is cold. A pure-play with a compressed mNAV and no earnings component has less room to maneuver.
• Talent. Equity compensation tied to a two-component valuation is a more legible and stable proposition for prospective hires than equity tied entirely to Bitcoin’s market sentiment.
• Allocator access. Many institutional allocators cannot underwrite a valuation built entirely on mNAV within their current mandates. The earnings component creates a bridge, opening the door to capital that would otherwise be unable to participate regardless of conviction.

The floor is not just a comfort during difficult conditions. It is a structural advantage that compounds over time, widening the capital base, strengthening the talent proposition, and maintaining strategic momentum across the full cycle.

How to think about the decision

These three models serve different objectives. The right framework starts with honest answers to a few questions:

• What does the existing business look like? A company with established revenue and clients already has the foundation for the operating company model. A company without it is choosing between building that foundation and committing to a pure-play path.
• What is the realistic path to scale? The digital credit model is the most powerful expression of the thesis but requires scale and credibility that takes time to build. The operating company model does not depend on reaching that threshold to function well.
• What does the investor base look like? Pure-play structures appeal most clearly to allocators who want direct Bitcoin exposure. Operating companies reach a broader set of capital partners, including those whose mandates require an operating business to participate.
• What kind of company do you want to be running across a full cycle? This is the question underneath all the others. The answer should drive the structure, not the other way around.

Conclusion

The companies that define the next era of corporate Bitcoin adoption will not all look the same. Digital credit issuers will operate at the frontier of Bitcoin-native capital markets. Financial engineering pure-plays will build toward that destination with focused conviction. Operating companies will build businesses where the treasury and core operations strengthen each other across the cycle.

Each model is a genuine expression of the thesis. The goal of this framework is to make the differences legible, so executives can choose the structure that fits what they are actually building, with clear eyes about what each model asks of them in return.

The question was never which model holds the most Bitcoin. It was always which model fits what you are trying to build.

Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.

This post The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.

OpenAI’s latest GPT-5.4 Pro model has now achieved an IQ score higher than 99.96% of all human beings, giving markets a fresh signal that AI capability gains are starting to outpace the usual product-cycle noise.

OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 Pro touches 150 on public IQ benchmark as markets enter another macro-heavy week

TrackingAI’s public leaderboard now places OpenAI GPT-5.4 Pro at an IQ score of 150, a sharp step up from the 136 score that OpenAI’s o3 posted on the Mensa Norway test last year.

The jump arrives at a moment when market attention has narrowed around Iran, energy, labor softness, and the next inflation print. That creates a different question for the week ahead: how quickly is machine intelligence compounding, and when will that acceleration begin to overlap with economic positioning?

Why this matters: A move from 136 to 150 on a widely understood benchmark compresses a complex capability shift into a simple signal. For businesses, that signal feeds directly into decisions around automation, software budgets, and headcount planning. For markets, it adds another variable alongside rates, inflation, and growth expectations.

OpenAI introduced GPT-5.4 as its most capable and efficient frontier model for professional work, with stronger coding, tool use, and computer use, and a context window of up to 1 million tokens. In the same release, OpenAI said GPT-5.4 achieved a new state of the art on GDPval and exceeded human performance on OSWorld-Verified.

Those benchmarks are separate from a public IQ test, yet the direction of travel aligns. Capability is rising across separate measurement systems, and that rise is becoming fast enough to influence budgeting, hiring plans, workflow design, and software spend.

A score of 150 on a public IQ-style benchmark compresses a broader capability move into a single, portable signal. The number is easy to understand even before the methodology is debated.

The earlier o3 Mensa result established the benchmark and its limits. GPT-4.1’s one-million-token context window showed how OpenAI was extending model utility across long-horizon code and document tasks, while our analysis of OpenAI’s expanding capital loop linked model progress to hardware expansion, financing loops, and infrastructure demand.

Taken together, those developments place the latest IQ score within a broader commercial and economic context. A move from 136 to 150 on a public benchmark is striking on its own. A move from 136 to 150 while OpenAI is pushing deeper into tool use, computer use, enterprise productivity, and capital-intensive infrastructure carries broader implications.

Public IQ benchmarks are limited, but the capability curve is still moving higher

Public IQ-style tests remain imperfect instruments for measuring frontier models. TrackingAI runs a public Mensa-style benchmark and also maintains a harder private offline test.

IQ-style tests compress a narrow slice of cognitive performance into a single number, obscuring variation across reasoning types, context handling, creativity, and real-world problem-solving.

For AI and humans alike, scores are sensitive to test design, training exposure, and pattern familiarity, which makes them a noisy proxy for general capability.

An IQ of 150 sits at the extreme upper tail of the distribution, often associated with individuals such as Albert Einstein or Richard Feynman. In practical terms, it implies very fast abstraction, strong pattern recognition, and the ability to navigate complex, multi-step problems with limited guidance.

The platform reports scores as rolling averages across recent completions, and the methodology raises familiar questions around prompt structure, reproducibility, training-set contamination, and format familiarity. Those concerns were already visible when o3 reached 136, and they remain active now that GPT-5.4 Pro sits at 150.

Related Reading

OpenAI’s o3 scores 136 on Mensa Norway test, surpassing 98% of human population

OpenAI’s o3 model reaches Mensa-Level IQ in independent testing.

Apr 17, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Even with those limits, the broader pattern has become harder to dismiss. One isolated benchmark result can be explained away as a quirk. A cluster of gains across public IQ-style testing, coding, browser use, desktop navigation, and knowledge-work performance carries more analytical weight.

TrackingAI’s latest leaderboard places GPT-5.4 Pro at the top of its public IQ board ahead of all Cluade, Gemini, Qwen, and Grok models, offering an external, legible public benchmark that maps quickly onto the broader capability debate.

Few people need a detailed understanding of benchmark design to grasp that 150 sits in a rare range and investors do not need to accept every premise behind an IQ-style test to recognize that a jump of this size suggests acceleration rather than drift.

Enterprise buyers also do not need to believe that IQ equals general intelligence to see that systems with stronger pattern recognition, stronger tool use, and stronger long-horizon task handling are moving toward economically useful territory, extending far beyond puzzle-solving.

This points toward systems that can search, plan, verify, navigate, and produce real work across extended contexts. In that setting, the IQ score functions less as a novelty number and more as a signal of the density of frontier reasoning.

There is also competitive value in the leaderboard itself. A leadership position on a public benchmark reinforces OpenAI’s standing in the race for visible capability leadership, especially at a moment when model differentiation is becoming harder to discern from architecture notes alone.

Benchmark leadership compresses complexity into a simple hierarchy. It offers developers a signal, enterprise buyers a narrative handle, and investors another proxy for where the capability frontier currently sits.

OpenAI’s benchmark climb is beginning to overlap with the economic week ahead

The week ahead still runs through macro. The Bureau of Labor Statistics calendar clearly lays out the next key releases: the FOMC minutes from the March 17 to 18 meeting, due on April 8; the March Consumer Price Index, due on April 10; and the March Producer Price Index, due on April 14.

That schedule keeps rates, inflation, and growth anxiety in the foreground, but beneath that surface, a second economic track is taking shape, and OpenAI sits near its center.

Capability growth in frontier AI increasingly intersects with capital allocation. A model that pushes higher on public reasoning tests while also improving in coding, search, and computer use changes how businesses think about workflow redesign. It changes what software buyers expect from copilots and agents. It changes how quickly enterprises move from experimentation toward deployment.

Jack Dorsey recently posted that Block is moving “from hierarchy to intelligence,” using AI to take over coordination work once handled by management layers as the company reorganizes around individual contributors, directly responsible individuals, and player-coaches

Capability growth also changes which tasks can be carved out of labor cost structures and reassigned to software. These effects move through narrower channels first, including document workflows, spreadsheet workflows, customer support, research tasks, browser automation, internal operations, code generation, and verification loops.

OpenAI’s commercial direction reinforces that interpretation. In its GPT-5.4 launch materials, the company described stronger performance in professional work, stronger tool search, native computer use, and gains in benchmarked knowledge work across occupations that map directly onto the U.S. economy.

That places AI capability growth inside a familiar market question, where spending flows next if these systems continue improving at this pace.

The answer extends beyond model subscription revenue into cloud demand, chips, data centers, networking, power, software licenses, and labor productivity assumptions. OpenAI’s expanding capital loop already reflects part of that structure, and the benchmark gain adds a simpler public-facing signal on top of it.

That overlap is what gives the latest result broader relevance during a macro-heavy week. Markets already know the CPI setup. Markets already know oil prices can feed into inflation expectations. Markets already know the Fed minutes will be parsed for policy tone.

But is the growth in intelligence itself beginning to behave like a macro variable? Faster capability gains can alter enterprise spending plans, tighten competitive pressure across white-collar functions, support higher infrastructure outlays, and strengthen the case for AI-linked capital expenditure even in a slower nominal growth environment.

When TrackingAI shows GPT-5.4 Pro at 150, the number falls within a market that already views OpenAI as more than a lab. It is a platform company, a deployment company, an infrastructure customer, and a signal generator for adjacent sectors.

The next test sits in two places at once. One is methodological; public IQ-style benchmarks will keep drawing scrutiny, and they should. The other is economic; markets will decide, step by step, whether capability jumps of this size deserve to be priced alongside labor data, rate expectations, and capital spending trends.

OpenAI’s latest benchmark climb pushes that decision closer. The score is compact, legible, and easy to circulate. Its deeper relevance comes from the same place as the company’s broader product push; the frontier is still climbing, and the economic footprint of that climb is becoming harder to keep in a separate category.

The post GPT-5.4 Pro jumps to 150 IQ on MESNA Norway test as OpenAI breaks its own record appeared first on CryptoSlate.

In July 2025, Genius Group announced it was targeting a Bitcoin treasury of 10,000 BTC, framing it as a statement of deep strategic conviction.

This week, however, the company sold its last 84 BTC to pay off $8.5 million in debt and declared its treasury empty. The 18-month gap between those two moments is a perfect example of what's happening to the Bitcoin treasury trade right now.

Why this matters: The Bitcoin treasury narrative has been one of the market’s strongest structural bullish arguments. If corporate and sovereign holders behave like cyclical sellers rather than long-term accumulators, institutional adoption may amplify volatility instead of stabilizing it.

Public companies, including Empery, Genius Group, and Riot, have all sold Bitcoin this week, citing debt repayment, liquidity needs, or strategic pivots into AI and high-performance computing, while sovereign selling accelerates with Bhutan offloading more holdings.

Taken individually, each of these is an easily explainable non-event. But taken together, they expose a structural problem with a trade built on the promise of permanence: for a growing number of holders, Bitcoin is now the first asset they sell when the bills arrive.

The treasury trade rests on a simple pitch. Starting around 2020 and accelerating through 2024, publicly traded companies began buying Bitcoin with corporate cash or borrowed money and presenting it to investors as a reserve asset superior to inflation-eroded cash.

A few high-profile early movers delivered spectacular returns, and the strategy spread. Public companies now hold roughly 1.165 million bitcoin worth approximately $77 billion, more than five percent of the currency's fixed supply of 21 million coins.

The problem is that a reserve asset only functions as advertised if the holder never needs the cash back.

Related Reading

Bitcoin treasury trade faces a new test after Nakamoto sold $20M at a loss

The sale turns paper losses into a funding test as markets start separating stronger Bitcoin treasury plays from weaker ones.

Mar 31, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In the Bitcoin treasury trade, the debt comes first

Riot Platforms, one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners in the US, sold 5,363 BTC for approximately $535.5 million in 2025, with its annual filing explicitly tying retention decisions to cash requirements for operations and expansion.

An earlier filing had already disclosed 3,300 BTC pledged as collateral against a $200 million credit facility. Riot continues to tap its treasury to fund a pivot into AI and high-performance computing, a strategy increasingly seen across the mining industry.

MARA Holdings sold 15,133 BTC for around $1.1 billion in March, using the proceeds to retire approximately $1 billion of convertible senior notes. Empery Digital sold 370 BTC for $24.7 million and used the proceeds to repay its outstanding term loan in full, freeing 1,800 BTC it had previously posted as collateral. Its shares are down 75% from their 2025 high.

The sequence is consistent across all of them: Bitcoin accumulated during optimism, pledged when capital was needed, and liquidated when the debt came due.

It's worth noting that the largest and best-capitalized players are still adding to their positions.

Metaplanet acquired 5,075 BTC in the first quarter of 2026, making it the third-largest corporate holder, while Strategy holds over 762,000 BTC as by far the largest treasury position in existence.

This tells us that the treasury trade isn't collapsing uniformly, but sorting into two camps: deep-pocketed accumulators who can afford to wait, and cash-pressured sellers who discover, when conditions tighten, that their strategic reserve is their most liquid asset.

The reserve asset that was always too easy to sell

The Bitcoin treasury trade gets quite a bit of weight when sovereign actors enter it.

Bhutan, a small Himalayan kingdom, built one of the world's more unusual government Bitcoin positions by mining it using surplus hydroelectric power at near-zero cost. The country's stack has fallen from a peak of about 13,000 BTC in late 2024 to roughly 5,400 BTC, a 58% reduction, with activity managed by its state-owned investment arm, Druk Holding and Investments.

Throughout March 2026, Bhutan offloaded tens of millions worth of BTC through controlled, low-impact transfers with no market disruption. This kind of distribution pattern shows that the treasury was running a planned drawdown rather than being shaken out by debt.

A significant portion of the cash from the offloaded Bitcoin was directed toward Gelephu Mindfulness City, a major national development project requiring real capital. Because Bhutan mined its coins rather than bought them, every sale it made was pure profit. The underlying logic, though, is exactly like that of our previously mentioned corporate sellers: the position exists to be monetized when a need for funding arises.

Bitcoin has been struggling to retain support at $67,000, going above and below the critical level for days. Altcoins are also struggling, with larger coins like ETH and SOL losing anywhere between 4% and 8% daily, while smaller tokens keep seeing even wilder volatility. With $200 million to $400 million liquidated every day in the past week, it's safe to say that crypto markets have been feeling the geopolitical pressure hard.

In that environment, treasury selling does more than just add supply to a struggling market. It exposes something the treasury trade's most enthusiastic architects may not have fully reckoned with: they built a buyer base out of the wrong material.

There's a deep irony in this. The very properties that made Bitcoin attractive as a treasury asset in the first place (its liquidity, its 24-hour markets, the frictionless ease of converting it to cash at any hour on any day) are exactly the properties that make it the first thing a cash-pressured CFO reaches for when a debt payment looms.

Compared to gold, Bitcoin is trivially quick and easy to sell, and the Bitcoin treasury promise of having a liquid alternative to cash inadvertently handed companies, well…a liquid alternative to cash.

Liquidity, by definition, gets used. Every company that pledged its BTC as loan collateral was simultaneously creating a forced-selling mechanism and embedding a potential margin call into its own balance sheet.

The longer-term consequence for Bitcoin is harder to quantify but still worth considering seriously. The institutional adoption story has been one of the most durable bullish arguments for Bitcoin over the past four years, resting on the assumption that corporate and sovereign buyers represent a fundamentally different, stickier class of holder than retail speculators.

If the current wave of selling establishes instead that treasury holders are just pro-cyclical, buying during enthusiasm, pledging during expansion, and then liquidating during stress, then the arrival of institutional capital does nothing to change Bitcoin's volatility profile. It just adds a more elaborately dressed version of the same behavior.

The buyers still standing, Strategy with its 762,000 BTC and Metaplanet with its methodical quarterly accumulation, may yet prove the thesis right, but they're proving it almost alone, which was never the point.

The treasury trade was supposed to be a movement, a permanent re-rating of how the world's balance sheets relate to a fixed-supply digital asset. What it turns out to have been, for a significant and growing number of its participants, is a short-term financing strategy wearing the mask of long-term conviction. When the mask comes off, what remains is an asset people buy when they have money to spare and sell when they don't, which is not a reserve but just another position.

The post Bitcoin’s “permanent buyers” are starting to sell as debt and cash pressures mount appeared first on CryptoSlate.

On March 31, 2026, Wall Street saw its best trading day in nearly a year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained over 1,100 points, the S&P 500 rose 2.9% for its best single-day performance since last May, and the Nasdaq jumped 3.8%.

The mood, as one market recap cheerfully dubbed it, was “Hormuz Hope,” a rally built on the possibility that the US-Iran war and the stranglehold it had on global oil supplies might finally be winding down.

President Trump had signaled openness to ending the military campaign, and Iran's president said his country had “the necessary will to end the war” if its security conditions were met.

Beneath those headlines, however, the traders who deal in the more complex products of financial markets (the options, the futures, and the hedges) weren't buying it. While the market might have looked like it was finally stabilizing with upside potential on the surface, the positioning underneath it remained far from certain,

Understanding why requires grasping two straightforward concepts: what “open interest” means, and what it signals when it shrinks. Open interest is simply the total value of bets that remain active in the derivatives market, futures, and options contracts that haven't been settled or closed. When open interest grows, more traders are putting money to work, expressing conviction about where a market is headed. When it falls, they're closing their positions, cutting their losses, and stepping away.

Bitcoin's $46 billion derivatives problem

Bitcoin trades around the clock across hundreds of exchanges around the world, essentially acting as a live barometer of global risk appetite, and right now that barometer is giving an ambiguous reading.

The total open interest in Bitcoin derivatives sits at roughly 703,940 Bitcoin, or about $46.85 billion in notional value, showing a market still loaded with leverage after a period of significant stress. If peace hopes were really returning, confident re-risking would look like traders buying in aggressively. That makes the 4.41% single-day retreat in open interest we've seen on Apr. 1 more caution than conviction.

The funding rate, a fee that traders holding bullish positions must pay to maintain them, has been only slightly positive and punctuated by repeated negative dips. When funding rates surge, it signals that bullish sentiment has driven open interest to unsustainable heights, with buyers outnumbering sellers significantly. The muted, flat-to-barely-positive funding Bitcoin has shown in the past two weeks signals a lack of appetite for new risk.

What makes this harder to dismiss as noise is that the institutional presence in Bitcoin derivatives has grown considerably. Of that $46 billion in open interest, more than $7 billion sits on CME, the same regulated exchange where pension funds and sophisticated asset managers do most of their hedging. Rising institutional open interest has established Bitcoin as a mainstream financial instrument, which means the retreat reflects decisions being made in boardrooms and on trading desks, far beyond the speculation of the retail market.

The ratio of options to futures in Bitcoin has also shifted. Earlier this year, options, which act like insurance policies and cushion against sudden price moves, accounted for a far larger share of the Bitcoin derivatives market, but that ratio has since dropped to about 65%, down sharply from highs near 90% last month.

When options exposure shrinks, and futures dominate, the market becomes more directional and less insulated: manageable, until something goes wrong quickly. Data shows particular sensitivity clustered in the $66,000-to-$67,000 price range, a zone where large positions appear concentrated and where a move back into that band could destabilize things rapidly.

Oil options tell the same story

The Strait of Hormuz, the 21-mile chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world's daily oil consumption flows, has seen commercial traffic reduced to a trickle since the conflict began. Nearly 17.8 million barrels per day of oil and fuel flows have been disrupted, with close to 500 million barrels of total liquids lost so far, according to Rystad Energy.

When Brent crude dipped briefly below $100 a barrel on April 1, retreating from highs above $112 just days earlier, markets treated it as confirmation that the worst was behind them.

The options market, however, remained considerably less certain. Ownership of Brent call options betting on crude reaching $150 a barrel by the end of April has risen tenfold in the past month, with open interest in those contracts now standing at nearly 29,000 lots, each representing 1,000 barrels of oil. This is a clear sign that the markets see tail risk outcomes to this conflict.

The largest concentration of open interest remains in $100 call options, the kind of positioning that reflects a market still hedging for further upside shock rather than celebrating an all-clear.

deVere CEO Nigel Green explained the underlying concern:

“Brent at $115 is being treated as a spike. The data tells a different story. Prices are up close to 60% in a single month, options markets are actively pricing scenarios of $150 oil, and up to 20% of global supply has been disrupted through the Strait of Hormuz. Those are not conditions associated with a short-lived shock.”

That view finds an uncomfortable echo in the diplomatic record itself. Trump said Iran had asked for a ceasefire; Iran's foreign ministry called the claim “false and baseless.” With two governments offering irreconcilable accounts of the same negotiation across the same chokepoint, the market rallied on the more optimistic version while the hedges continued pricing both.

The result is a gap that's simple but consequential. Stocks are cheering a ceasefire framework that remains unconfirmed, Bitcoin open interest is shrinking when it should be rebuilding, and oil options are still pricing meaningful probability for another energy spike.

The VIX, Wall Street's own fear gauge, dropped but held at 24.54, a level that still shows elevated anxiety. Markets are generally skilled at pricing the future they want, but the derivatives underneath them tend to price the future they fear, and right now those two futures look quite different.

The rally has calmed the headlines without cleaning up the positioning, and if the ceasefire unravels, Bitcoin and oil will likely be among the first places it becomes obvious.

The post Bitcoin derivatives flash warning as $46B market pulls back from Iran ceasefire rally appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Washington is in a generous mood with its banks. In March, federal regulators unveiled a sweeping overhaul of capital requirements (the financial cushions that banks must hold to absorb losses in hard times), and the headlines wrote themselves: deregulation, relief, billions freed up for lending and buybacks. The proposal would cut the required capital for the largest Wall Street firms by nearly 5%.

The Federal Reserve estimated that roughly $20 billion in capital could be released for the eight largest banks alone. Former Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr put the figure even higher, warning the total could reach $60 billion once all related changes were factored in.

Why this matters: Bank stability depends less on reported capital and more on what markets believe is actually there. If unrealized losses are still sitting on balance sheets, confidence can break faster than regulation can react, turning a technical accounting issue into a liquidity crisis.

Related Reading

White House crypto czar leaves office after securing crypto wins for banks and institutions instead of Bitcoin

David Sacks exits after shaping U.S. crypto policy, delivering institutional gains while Bitcoin promises remain unresolved.

Mar 27, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

But something unexpected surfaces when you read the fine print. Regulators carved out one specific exception: certain large regional banks would have to begin accounting for unrealized losses on their books, a change directly tied to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023. That provision, largely overlooked in coverage of the broader rollback, amounts to a regulatory admission.

To understand why, you need to understand what an “unrealized loss” actually is for banks. Imagine you buy a ten-year government bond for $100. Interest rates then rise sharply, new bonds now pay more, making yours less attractive as its market value drops to, say, $80.

Even though you sold nothing and lost no cash, this means that you're now sitting on a $20 loss, unrealized and invisible to most financial scorecards.

For years, midsize banks were allowed to exclude those paper losses from the capital figures they reported to regulators, as though the gap between market value and book value didn't exist.

How Silicon Valley Bank's unrealized losses triggered a bank run in 2023

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse resulted from something far more mundane than fraud or reckless lending: a portfolio of perfectly legal long-term bond investments that shed much of their value as interest rates climbed.

We began seeing the first signs of a crisis in early March 2023, when SVB announced a $1.8 billion loss on the sale of securities, a direct consequence of those unrealized losses, alongside a plan to raise $2 billion in fresh capital.

Shares fell 60% the following day as uninsured depositors began withdrawing their assets en masse; by that evening, $42 billion had left the bank, with another $100 billion staged for withdrawal by morning.

Related Reading

Contagion from SVB's collapse highlights need for banking system resilience, says Fed official

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision, Michael Barr, is set to testify before lawmakers on Tuesday.

Mar 27, 2023 · Dorian Batycka

Nearly 30% of its deposits evaporated in a matter of hours. SVB was killed by panic, and the panic was caused by the losses that had been there for quite a while, suddenly becoming visible.

The bank's capital looked substantially more adequate than it was, given that almost none of its supervisors, depositors, or investors could gauge the true size of the unrealized securities losses.

Under the rules then in place, SVB had exercised a legal and widely available option, simply opting out of including those losses in its reported capital figures, a decision that turned out to be catastrophic.

Banks that were required to reflect unrealized losses in regulatory capital, meanwhile, managed their interest rate risk considerably more carefully. The lesson of SVB is that hiding losses of this magnitude guarantees that no one will act until it's too late.

Why the new bank capital rules still require regional banks to report unrealized losses

Which brings us back to the current proposal. The change requiring large regional banks to account for unrealized losses will increase their capital requirements by 3.1%, although their total capital is still expected to fall by 5.2% when all pending changes are considered.

Banks with assets below $100 billion face no such requirement, and their capital is projected to fall even further. The message we get from this is clear: the problem was real, and it was real at a specific scale. The carve-out is Washington saying, in its characteristically bloodless bureaucratic language, that SVB's collapse was due to bad regulation.

Barr, who left his vice chair role earlier this year rather than face removal by the Trump administration but retained his seat on the Fed board, has been vocal about his unease with this. In a formal dissent, he warned that capital requirements are being significantly reduced, that liquidity requirements could also be reduced, that Federal Reserve supervisory staff have been cut by over 30%, and that banking is built on trust.

That final phrase deserves attention. A bank can survive deteriorating accounting right up until the moment the people whose money sits inside it stop believing it.

Supporters of the broader rewrite have a reasonable case. The original 2023 Basel proposal was widely seen as overcalibrated, a blunt instrument that pushes risk out of the regulated system into the shadows instead of actually reducing it. Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said that capital will remain robust and that the new framework now better aligns with requirements and actual risk.

But the unrealized-loss carve-out survives even inside the loosened framework. If the problem were truly solved, if duration risk and depositor confidence were no longer the market's concerns, there would be no reason to keep the provision. Regulators don't impose expensive requirements out of nostalgia.

The temptation is to see the new proposal as straightforward deregulation. But the more accurate interpretation is also the more interesting one. Even as Washington hands banks relief, it's quietly preserving a single hard lesson from SVB: that when rates jump and losses pile up, what a bank is actually sitting on still matters, whether the rules say so or not.

The post US frees up billions for banks while quietly admitting SVB’s core failure never went away appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin, once promoted by some investors as a hedge against geopolitical turmoil, is behaving like a liquidity-sensitive risk asset at a time when energy prices are climbing, and macro stress is spreading.

This comes as the conflict between the United States and Iran deepens, with shock rippling through oil, the dollar, and broader financial conditions before landing in a crypto market that is already showing signs of fatigue.

That has reopened discussion of a far steeper downside path than the market had been willing to entertain only weeks ago.

Why this matters: This marks a shift in Bitcoin's behavior under stress. Instead of attracting defensive flows amid geopolitical risk, it is reacting to tighter financial conditions, rising oil prices, and a stronger dollar. That changes how investors position around macro shocks and raises the likelihood of deeper drawdowns if liquidity continues to contract.

Related Reading

Iran threatens major US companies in the Middle East creating new risk for crypto

Iran’s warning is not just a geopolitical headline. It could hit parts of the infrastructure and corporate balance sheets now tied to crypto.

Apr 1, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Oil shock drives the first wave of repricing

The latest leg of the market’s repricing accelerated after President Donald Trump’s April 1 remarks dimmed hopes for a near-term easing in the Middle East.

By signaling that US military operations could intensify over the next two to three weeks, without offering a clear timeline for an end to hostilities, the administration pushed investors back into a defensive stance.

The initial reaction showed up across equities, though the deeper signal came from energy.

US stocks fell intraday before paring losses by the close, with the S&P 500 down 0.23% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average off 0.39%. In Asia, the sell-off was sharper, with South Korea’s KOSPI dropping 4.2% and MSCI Emerging Asia falling 2.3%.

Oil moved more decisively. Data from Oilprices.com showed that West Texas Intermediate crude jumped 11.41% to $111.54 a barrel, its biggest absolute gain since 2020, while Brent rose 7.78% to $109.03.

The move followed US-Israeli strikes that began on Feb. 28 and Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint that carries roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flows.

These developments have significant impacts on the crypto market as a sustained rise in crude directly feeds into inflation expectations, tightens financial conditions, and reduces the market’s tolerance for speculation.

With the dollar index up 0.48%, Treasury market spreads wider by 27%, and the VIX climbing toward 25, the broader macro picture is turning against risk assets that depend on abundant liquidity and steady investor appetite.

Related Reading

Bitcoin, stocks rally because of chatter that Iran is ready to ‘end the war' as Dollar Index sinks below 100

Bitcoin's bounce back above $68,000 hinges on hopes for Middle East peace amid fluctuating oil prices.

Mar 31, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Bitcoin entered the shock already weakened

The Iran escalation may have accelerated the latest sell-off, but it did not create the market’s fragility. Bitcoin was already losing support before the geopolitical backdrop deteriorated.

CryptoQuant data show selling pressure has continued to outweigh institutional accumulation despite earlier support from spot exchange-traded funds and corporate buyers such as Strategy. The firm’s 30-day apparent demand growth stands at -63,000 BTC, indicating that fresh demand has not been strong enough to absorb supply.

The same pattern is visible across large holders. Whale wallets holding between 1,000 and 10,000 BTC have shifted from accumulation into one of the sharpest distribution phases of the cycle. The one-year change in whale holdings has swung from an increase of about 200,000 BTC at the 2024 peak to a deficit of 188,000 BTC.

Mid-sized holders have also pulled back. Wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC, often seen as an important layer of market support, have seen their holdings grow by only 429,000 BTC in the current market cycle, compared to about 1 million BTC in late 2025.

This weakness is especially clear in the United States. Coinbase Premium, a common gauge of US spot demand, has remained negative even as Bitcoin fell into the $65,000 to $70,000 range. That suggests American buyers, both retail and institutional, have not returned in enough size to stabilize the market.

Essentially, those figures help to describe a market that had already begun to lose resilience before war headlines intensified.

Related Reading

Bitcoin ready to record fourth straight red month and the $81,000 floor is suddenly everything

Bitcoin is below its 2 year moving average again, and traders fear this signal could trigger a brutal capitulation.

Jan 30, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Leverage is turning a weak market into a fragile one

Meanwhile, Bitcoin's current weak spot demand became more dangerous when leverage is doing too much of the market’s work.

In calmer markets, that kind of positioning can help maintain price levels. However, it becomes a vulnerability in a macro shock as contracts that might otherwise have rolled forward are more likely to be cut, either by choice or through forced liquidation.

That is how orderly weakness turns into a cascade. Prices fall, leveraged longs are forced out, more selling follows, and the market starts moving on positioning stress rather than conviction.

Analysts at Bitunix told CryptoSlate that Bitcoin remains stuck in a passive pricing regime, with resistance around $69,400 still uncleared and downside liquidity continuing to build near $65,500. In a more hostile macro setting, that lower band could become the trigger point for a broader liquidation wave.

Options markets are sending a similarly cautious message. Greeks.live data show 28,000 BTC contracts expired on April 3 with a put-call ratio of 0.54 and a max pain point at $68,000, representing $1.8 billion in notional value.

According to the firm:

“Bitcoin performed poorly in both price and market sentiment during the first quarter of this year, and the first week of the second quarter has also been weak. Rebuilding confidence may require time and capital support; currently, all indicators point to bear market conditions.”

Why $10,000 is still a tail risk

Bitunix has described the current environment as a triple-constraint regime shaped by elevated inflation expectations, policy limits, and widening geopolitical risk.

That framework helps explain why crypto is reacting so sharply, as liquidity cannot ease much if oil stays high. At the same time, market confidence cannot recover easily if war risk continues to rise, speculative positions become harder to defend as the dollar strengthens, and volatility rises across asset classes.

Against this backdrop, the more plausible cases for BTC still point to lower levels.

In a moderate scenario, where the conflict remains contained but inflation stays elevated, unwinding leveraged futures could drag Bitcoin from around $70,000 to $50,000, within a roughly 25% to 30% correction.

Meanwhile, a harsher bear-case path would emerge if ETF outflows accelerate, spot demand remains weak, and the dollar continues to tighten financial conditions. In that setting, Bitcoin could slide into the $20,000 to $30,000 range, erasing 60% to 70% of its value from recent levels.

The move to $10,000 sits beyond that as a black swan outcome. It would likely require a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz or a wider regional war severe enough to push oil toward $150 to $200 a barrel, drive a much sharper tightening in global liquidity, and knock equities down by more than 30%.

Under those conditions, speculative capital across crypto would shrink dramatically, leaving Bitcoin exposed to the kind of 80% drawdown seen in earlier cycle washouts.

For now, the immediate takeaway is that Bitcoin is not acting as a safe haven amid war. Instead, it is trading like a highly sensitive risk asset whose direction still depends on liquidity, leverage, and the market’s willingness to absorb macro shock.

The post Bitcoin’s safe haven story breaks as war shock revives $10,000 risk if oil hits $150 a barrel appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Michael Saylor has sparked a fresh wave of debate with his latest X post, claiming it is a "Good Friday to buy Bitcoin." This comes as the $BTC price lingers near $67,400, a staggering 46% drop from its 2025 peak of $125,000.

The "Saylor Signal" vs. Market Reality

MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor is back to his usual bullish antics. On April 3, 2026, he took to X (formerly Twitter) to declare, "It’s a Good Friday to buy Bitcoin." For the "HODL" community, this is a standard rallying cry. However, for investors who watched Bitcoin plummet from a euphoric $125,000 in October 2025 to its current level of approximately $67,400, the message feels different this time.

The market is currently grappling with a "correlation crisis." While Saylor remains the ultimate $Bitcoin maximalist, his firm has shifted focus toward its new "STRC" preferred stock dividends. With significant unrealized losses on recent tranches, many are wondering: Is this a genuine "buy the dip" opportunity, or is the "Saylor Signal" losing its luster?

Should You Buy Bitcoin Now?

Whether "now" is a good time to buy depends on your time horizon. Technically, Bitcoin is in a clear downtrend on the daily charts. However, historically, buying during 40-50% drawdowns from all-time highs (ATH) has been a profitable long-term strategy. The current price of $67,400 represents a significant discount for those who missed the $100k+ rally, but macro headwinds suggest the bottom may not be in yet.

 The 2026 Bitcoin Crash Explained

To understand why Saylor is calling for buys now, we must look at why the price crashed. The decline from $125,000 was not a single event but a "perfect storm" of factors:

• Monetary Policy Shifts: Recent hawkish signals from the Federal Reserve have drained liquidity from "risk-on" assets.
• Institutional De-risking: After the euphoria of 2025, major players have been trimming Bitcoin ETF holdings to lock in profits or cover losses in equities.
• The $67k Magnet: Since breaking below the $90,000 support, Bitcoin has been searching for a stable floor, finally resting in the mid-60s.

Historical Performance on Good Friday

While Saylor's post uses the holiday as a backdrop, does Bitcoin actually perform well on Good Friday? Historically, the Friday of Easter weekend sees lower trading volumes as traditional markets are closed. This "thin" liquidity can lead to sharp, erratic moves, but there is no statistically significant "holiday pump" trend. In fact, Bitcoin price action today remains largely sideways, reflecting what analysts call "aggressive caution."

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Analyzing the $67,400 Support

From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin is currently testing a critical psychological floor.

• Support Level: The $65,000 - $67,000 zone is vital. If BTC fails to hold this, the next major support sits at $58,000.
• Resistance: To turn bullish, BTC must reclaim the $72,000 level to break the current series of "lower highs."

Hedge funds have reportedly unwound nearly a third of their Bitcoin exposure according to recent Bloomberg market data. This institutional exit is the primary reason the price hasn't bounced as aggressively as retail traders hoped.

Bitcoin Strategy: How to Position Your Portfolio

If you are following Saylor’s advice, risk management is paramount:

• DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging): Instead of going "all-in," spread purchases over several weeks.
• Self-Custody: Given the volatility, moving assets to hardware wallets is recommended to avoid exchange risks.
• Monitor the DXY: A stronger U.S. Dollar usually correlates with further drops in the crypto market.

• XRP enters a pivotal 2026 phase despite weak price action
• Ripple is expanding utility via XRP Ledger and RLUSD
• Strong fundamental growth continues, especially in Asia and institutional adoption

XRP Price Today: Bulls Struggle at Key Support

As of April 4, 2026, the XRP price (referenced against major pairs) is trading near the $1.31 mark. Following a rejection at the $1.60 resistance level in late March, the token has entered a period of consolidation. Technical indicators like the Money Flow Index (MFI) are currently hovering around 35, suggesting that XRP is approaching oversold territory.

Traders are closely watching the $1.25 support level. A breakdown below this could see a retest of the 52-week low near $1.21. Conversely, a daily close above the 7-day Moving Average ($1.33) is required to signal a short-term trend reversal.

Ripple News Today with RLUSD

A major highlight in today's news is the continued expansion of Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD.

• South Korean Expansion: Ripple recently secured a listing for RLUSD on Coinone, one of South Korea's premier regulated exchanges. This allows for direct KRW/RLUSD trading, tapping into one of the world's most active XRP trading communities.
• Institutional Minting: On-chain data reveals significant activity, including a massive 69 million RLUSD mint earlier this month linked to Gemini.
• SWIFT Partnership: Ripple Treasury has officially joined the SWIFT partner program, a move designed to bridge traditional banking infrastructure with digital asset settlement.

The CLARITY Act: A Double-Edged Sword?

The legislative landscape is shifting with the introduction of the CLARITY Act in the U.S. Senate. This bill aims to provide a definitive framework for stablecoins and digital assets.

The latest draft of the CLARITY Act proposes a ban on yield for passive stablecoin holdings. While this could hurt competitors like USDC, analysts suggest that RLUSD is uniquely positioned. Because RLUSD’s growth is driven by cross-border payments and institutional collateral rather than retail yield incentives, it may emerge as a primary beneficiary of these new rules.

XRP Price Prediction for 2026

Despite the current price stagnation, institutional sentiment remains cautiously optimistic. Many analysts, including those from Standard Chartered, maintain year-end targets for XRP above $2.50, citing the eventual "re-risking" of the market as regulatory clarity settles.

After a volatile first quarter dominated by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and concerns over the Strait of Hormuz, the market appears to be searching for a definitive floor.

Leading financial institutions and regulatory bodies have provided the "one-two punch" of confidence that many traders were waiting for. From Goldman Sachs declaring the bottom is near to the highly anticipated release of the Clarity Act draft, the narrative is shifting from fear to structural accumulation.

Is the Bitcoin Bottom Finally In?

According to a recent analyst note from Goldman Sachs, the six-month downward trend for Bitcoin may finally be exhausted. Analysts point to a reversal in institutional flow as the primary indicator. After four months of consistent net outflows, spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a staggering $1.32 billion in net inflows during March.

"The re-entry of institutional liquidity suggests that the 'leveraged washout' is complete," says James Yaro, lead analyst at Goldman Sachs. "With BTC testing critical support at $68,000, we are seeing a transition from speculative selling to long-term institutional holding."

Currently, the Bitcoin price is oscillating near the $67,000 mark. While it remains nearly 45% down from its previous highs, the stabilization at this level is viewed by many as a "springboard" for the next leg up, especially as the Federal Reserve hints at potential rate softening.

Regulatory Clarity: The "Clarity Act" and SEC Taxonomy

One of the biggest hurdles for the crypto market in 2026 has been the "gray area" of regulation. However, early April marks a turning point with the expected release of the Clarity Act draft. This legislation aims to provide a definitive framework for U.S. digital assets, separating "Digital Commodities" from "Digital Securities."

The SEC has also recently updated its token taxonomy, clarifying that:

• Digital Commodities: Assets like Bitcoin, where value is derived from automated network mechanics.
• Payment Stablecoins: Regulated under the GENIUS Act, providing a safer environment for users of Tether (USDT) and USDC.
• Digital Tools: Tokens used for utility, such as event tickets or identity badges, are increasingly being shielded from traditional securities litigation.

For investors, this means less "regulation by enforcement" and more "regulation by rulebook," which is a prerequisite for the next wave of massive institutional adoption.

Ethereum and Solana: Technical Upgrades on the Horizon

While $Bitcoin battles for its bottom, the "Big Two" altcoins are preparing for massive fundamental shifts.

Ethereum's "Glamsterdam" Upgrade

Ethereum is currently moving through its "Strawmap" and "Glamsterdam" upgrades. These developments are focused on PeerDAS and Zk-cryptography, with the goal of pushing the network's throughput toward 10,000+ transactions per second (TPS).

Solana's Alpenglow Protocol

Not to be outdone, Solana is rolling out the Alpenglow protocol. Developed by Anza, this upgrade introduces "Votor" and "Rotor," which could allow block finality in as little as 100 milliseconds. This competition between L1 giants is driving a "flight to quality" among developers and investors alike.

Crypto Price Today: Key Levels to Watch

The first quarter of 2026 has concluded, leaving the cryptocurrency market in a state of significant reassessment. After a bullish end to 2025, the start of the year brought a harsh "risk-off" reality. Major assets, led by Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), saw substantial drawdowns as investors grappled with a perfect storm of geopolitical conflict, surging energy costs, and a hawkish shift in global monetary policy.

Why did Crypto Crash in 2026?

If you are looking for the primary reason for the crash: Q1 2026 was defined by a liquidity drain. As Bitcoin fell 23%, capital fled volatile assets in favor of traditional safe havens. While the broader market bled, specific utility-driven tokens like Tron (TRX) and UNUS SED LEO (LEO) managed to defy the trend, posting gains of 10% and 4.6% respectively.

Q1 2026 Market Performance Overview

The following table summarizes the Year-to-Date (YTD) performance of the top cryptocurrencies as of the end of March 2026:

The Macroeconomic "Pressure Cooker"

To understand the Q1 crash, one must look at the "Macroeconomic Pressure Cooker." This refers to the simultaneous rise in inflation expectations and interest rates. In early 2026, the US Federal Reserve signaled that interest rates would remain "higher for longer" to combat a sticky 2.7% inflation rate. This strengthened the US Dollar, making riskier assets like Ethereum less attractive to institutional desks.

Crypto Crash Reasons

The downturn was accelerated by significant global events:

• Geopolitical Conflict: Escalating tensions in the Middle East—specifically involving Iran—reignited fears of a broader war. This uncertainty historically triggers a flight to quality.
• Oil Prices: Crude oil prices surged in Q1, with Brent crude hitting over $118/bbl. High energy prices act as a tax on the global economy and increase the operational costs for Bitcoin miners, often leading to "miner capitulation" sell-offs.
• The Gold & Silver Hedge: Unlike crypto, Gold posted steady gains of roughly 8% earlier in the quarter, reaching near-record levels as investors sought a store of value that doesn't rely on digital network uptime or speculative sentiment.

Why Altcoins Suffered More

While Bitcoin’s 23% drop was painful, Solana (SOL) and BNB were hit harder, losing 36% and 32% respectively. This is a classic "beta" move; altcoins typically amplify Bitcoin's movements. When liquidity dries up, speculative "high-growth" ecosystems are the first to see capital outflows. Investors moved their holdings from high-risk dApp platforms into stablecoins or exited the market entirely.

The Outliers — Tron and LEO

Why did Tron (+10%) and UNUS SED LEO (+4.6%) survive the carnage?

• Tron (TRX): Tron has solidified itself as the "Global Settlement Layer" for USDT. During a crash, the demand for stablecoin transfers spikes. As users move to safety, the burning of TRX for transaction fees increases, creating deflationary price pressure that supported the TRX price.
• UNUS SED LEO (LEO): As a utility token for the Bitfinex ecosystem, LEO benefits from a consistent buy-back and burn mechanism. In periods of high volatility, exchange-based tokens often act as a "defensive" play, as trading volumes (and thus burn rates) remain elevated.

Institutional Sentiment and ETF Outflows

The latest crypto news highlights that Bitcoin ETFs saw their first sustained period of net outflows in Q1 2026. Institutional investors, who were the primary drivers of the 2025 rally, shifted their focus to the S&P 500 and banking stocks, which showed more resilience during the "war-inflation" scare.

Crypto Markets Are Moving — But Something Is Missing

Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has reacted to a wave of major geopolitical and macroeconomic developments. Rising tensions, escalating military actions, and a sharp surge in oil prices have already introduced volatility across Bitcoin and altcoins.

Yet despite all this, the overall market remains relatively stable.

Bitcoin is holding near the $66,000–$67,000 range, Ethereum is hovering around $2,000, and total crypto market capitalization remains largely flat.

👉 At first glance, this may seem like resilience.

👉 In reality, it signals something else: the market has not fully reacted yet.

Why the Real Move Hasn’t Started

The most important factor right now is simple:

👉 Wall Street is closed.

Due to the Good Friday holiday, U.S. stock markets are not trading. This means:

• Institutional investors are inactive
• ETFs are paused
• Large capital flows are temporarily frozen

At the same time, major developments are unfolding:

• Escalation in U.S.–Iran tensions
• Announcements targeting critical infrastructure
• Oil prices surging above key levels
• Gold behaving unexpectedly under pressure

👉 These events are happening without full market participation.

As a result, crypto is currently trading in a partial-information environment, where only retail and limited global flows are active.

Monday Is the Real Catalyst

👉 The U.S. market will reopen on Monday at 9:30 AM ET (3:30 PM Central European Time).

This moment could act as a major reset point for global markets.

Why?

Because all the news that broke during the market closure will be priced in simultaneously:

• Equity markets will react
• Oil markets will continue adjusting
• Institutional portfolios will rebalance
• Risk exposure will be reassessed

👉 In short: Monday is when the real repricing begins.

Why the Pressure Is Building

Markets are currently sitting in a fragile equilibrium.

On one side:

• Bullish crypto fundamentals (institutional adoption, regulatory progress)
• Bitcoin holding key levels

On the other:

• Rising oil prices tightening global liquidity
• Escalating geopolitical risk
• Uncertainty around further military actions

👉 This creates a compression phase — where price stays relatively stable while pressure builds underneath.

When markets reopen, that pressure is likely to release quickly.

How Big Could the Move Be?

Bearish Scenario (Higher Probability Short-Term)

If macro pressure dominates:

• Bitcoin could break below $66K, targeting $64K or lower
• Ethereum may lose the $2,000 level
• Altcoins could see sharper declines

👉 This would likely happen if:

• Oil continues rising
• War headlines intensify
• Equity markets open significantly lower

Bullish Scenario (Lower Probability but Possible)

If markets interpret the situation as contained:

• Bitcoin could push toward $68K–$70K
• Short squeezes could accelerate upside
• Risk appetite may temporarily return

👉 This would require:

• De-escalation signals
• Oil price stabilization or drop
• Strong dip-buying from institutions

Most Likely Outcome: Volatility First

Regardless of direction, one thing is highly likely:

👉 Volatility will expand sharply.

Expect:

• Fast moves in both directions
• Liquidations across leveraged positions
• Sudden reversals as markets search for direction

Oil Is Now Driving Crypto

One of the most important shifts in this cycle is clear:

👉 Crypto is no longer reacting only to crypto news.

Instead, it is increasingly tied to macro forces — especially energy markets.

As oil rises:

• Inflation expectations increase
• Central banks face pressure
• Liquidity tightens

👉 And when liquidity tightens, risk assets — including crypto — come under pressure.

This makes oil one of the key indicators to watch ahead of Monday.

What to Expect Until Then

Until Wall Street reopens:

• Markets may remain choppy
• Liquidity will stay relatively low
• Price movements may be misleading or incomplete

👉 The current market action is not the final move — it is the setup phase.

Conclusion: Crypto Is Waiting — But Not for Long

Crypto markets are currently reacting, but not fully.

The absence of institutional participation means that what we are seeing now is only a partial response to a much larger macro shift.

👉 Monday changes everything.

As global markets reopen, all delayed reactions will converge — creating the potential for a significant move across Bitcoin and the broader crypto market.

For investors, the key takeaway is simple:

👉 The real move hasn’t started yet — but it’s getting closer.

Claude developer Anthropic registered an employee-funded PAC amid a legal battle with the White House and rising election-year scrutiny of AI.

Researchers say internal emotion-like signals shape how large language models make decisions.

Financial giant Charles Schwab is set to launch spot buying of Bitcoin and Ethereum by the end of the quarter, the firm said Friday.

The FIFA World Cup will feature a prediction market platform built on ADI Chain, with the network’s token hitting a new high Friday.

Publicly traded Bitcoin miner MARA cut 15% of its staff this week after selling $1.1 billion in Bitcoin to fuel an AI push.

Dogecoin (DOGE) shrugs off bearish market sentiment with playful humor.

Bitcoin has been heavily scooped by high-profile and institutional investors in the last three days, with about 10,000 BTC entering the wallets of whale holders.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says the ultimate goal of crypto in the hands of 1 billion people is being worked on.

XRP has broken its two-week inflow streak with a week close of net outflows as institutional investors continue to withdraw their engagement with the funds.

Ripple Prime is scaling amid strong regulatory and capital backing.

XRP trades near $1.32 with growing optimism. April has historically been XRP’s strongest month, posting average returns of 24.8% since 2014, driven by the upcoming CLARITY Act Senate Banking Committee markup scheduled for the second half of the month. 

Taurox, an AI-driven trading protocol, positions itself to harness this momentum through autonomous agents that deliver diversified, risk-managed yields to stakers in the evolving crypto landscape.

Navigating XRP Volatility with Taurox’s Structured Edge

XRP’s recent price action remains choppy despite partnerships and regulatory progress, with escrow unlocks adding supply pressure and exposing holders to frequent 20-30% whipsaws. Taurox counters this by pooling deposits of USDT, BTC, or XRP into a shared trading pool. Global developers, quants, and AI engineers build the agents that generate proportional net profits. 

Each agent is capped at 2% of pool AUM, while KYA tiers enforce conservative, moderate, or aggressive risk levels. Enforced Sharpe ratios ≥1.5 and maximum drawdowns below 15% deliver smoother returns than direct exposure or traditional 2% management-fee hedge funds.

Pre-KYA Registration Now Open: Accelerating the Agent Pipeline

Taurox has hit a major roadmap milestone ahead of schedule by opening the Pre-KYA Registration Table. This early entry point allows developers, quants, and AI builders to pre-register their trading agents before the full Know Your Agent (KYA) system goes live. Pre-registered agents receive priority Proving Ground access, jumping the queue for faster entry and earlier capital allocation. 

They also qualify for bonus incentives from the dedicated Agent Creator Fund, which represents 10% of total TAUX supply. Anyone with a working trading strategy can now position their agent among the first wave in the Taurox ecosystem.

Taurox Mechanics: On-Chain AI Trading with Rigorous Controls

Taurox aggregates staker deposits into a central trading pool and mints txTokens at the prevailing NAV per share, starting at $1.00. The protocol maintains a 15% stablecoin reserve buffer and directs the remainder to agents through a performance-weighted algorithm. Agents execute strategies like statistical arbitrage via on-chain vaults or CEX sub-accounts. 

Every agent must complete the Proving Ground until achieving statistical significance, such as ≥500 trades. Risk controls include 2% daily stop-losses, 5% single-trade limits, and 5% pool-wide drawdown halts. KYA tiers enforce strategy fidelity in a fully verifiable decentralized quant framework.

TAUX Tokenomics: Fixed Supply and Burn-Driven Scarcity

TAUX has a fixed 2 billion non-mintable supply. Unlike traditional hedge funds, Taurox charges no upfront fees and takes only 5% of gross profits, purchased as TAUX on-market. Of this revenue, 30% is permanently burned, while 70% supports the DAO treasury. 

The remaining 95% distributes progressively to stakers and creators, with stakers receiving 80% at 0-20% returns, tapering to 43% above 300%, based on high-water mark net profits. Allocations include 40% for presale, 15% for staking rewards, 10% for agent incentives, and 5% for the team with 6-month cliff vesting.

Taurox Presale: Asymmetric Entry with Strong Fundamentals

Taurox Presale has entered Phase 4 and surpassed $950K raised. TAUX currently trades at $0.018. Phase 4 investors stand to gain almost 4.5x at listing when TAUX launches at $0.08. If Taurox reaches its $1B target pool, these investors could see up to 103x returns as TAUX reaches $1.85. A $500 investment today would grow to about $2,220 at listing and nearly $28,000 when TAUX hits $1 valuation. 

The presale features a 1-month cliff and 20% monthly unlocks from months 2-5, enabling immediate staking while limiting early sell pressure. Combined with 30% fee burns and progressive splits, it offers strong upside for short and long-term horizons.

Taurox as the Decentralized Quant Layer

Taurox blends AI autonomy, strict on-chain risk controls, and deflationary mechanics into next-generation DeFi. Its global agent ecosystem and burn-driven scarcity position it for sustainable growth as the crypto space evolves.

Learn More

Buy TAUX: https://taurox.io

Whitepaper: https://docs.taurox.io/

Official Telegram: https://t.me/tauroxlabs

Official X/Twitter: https://x.com/TauroxProtocol

The post Ripple (XRP) Down 7% This Month, Investors Move to Taurox (TAUX) as Pre-KYA Opening Might Start a Rally appeared first on Blockonomi.

The xrp price prediction crowd has chased the $100 target for years. Goldman Sachs just revealed a $153.8 million position spread across four XRP ETFs, making it the largest institutional holder by a factor of six, according to 24/7 Wall St. The CLARITY Act faces its make-or-break Senate markup in late April, and if it passes, Standard Chartered projects $4 to $8 billion in fresh ETF inflows that could push XRP toward $3.50 to $6, according to Yahoo Finance.

Yet XRP sits at $1.30, and reaching $100 still demands a $5.7 trillion market cap, larger than the entire crypto market combined. While XRP holders wait for a target that math alone cannot justify, one presale built by the team behind a $7 billion token is offering 150x at a price most investors have never seen this low. This piece breaks down the xrp price prediction reality and where the return math actually lives.

Goldman Sachs Loads XRP ETFs as CLARITY Act Approaches Binary Vote

24/7 Wall St reported that Goldman Sachs holds $153.8 million across Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, Grayscale, and 21Shares XRP ETFs, while CoinMarketCap confirmed $11.4 billion in XRP left Binance on April 2, tightening exchange supply to multi-month lows. The partnership validates XRP’s institutional case, but a validated use case and a profitable entry from $1.30 remain entirely different calculations.

The XRP Price Prediction Ceiling vs the Pepeto Floor: Where Returns Actually Live

Pepeto: The Presale That Converts XRP’s Validation Into Actual Holder Wealth

Finding a presale that combined meme token pricing with functional exchange infrastructure used to be nearly impossible. Most projects offered dashboards, chatbots, or lending tools that thousands of competitors already shipped. Pepeto changed the equation by delivering a full exchange ecosystem with zero-fee trading, a cross-chain bridge spanning Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana, and 188% APY staking that compounds daily.

These tools are not placeholder features on a roadmap. The exchange processes volume across three blockchains simultaneously, and every component runs on smart contracts verified through a SolidProof audit. That foundation keeps Pepeto in structural demand regardless of whether the market trends up or down, because utility drives volume in every condition.

At $0.0000001862, a $1,000 entry secures billions of tokens. The original Pepe shares the same 420 trillion total supply and peaked at an $11 billion market cap with zero products behind it. Reaching that valuation turns a $1,000 position into approximately $150,000, a 150x return that analysts treat as conservative because Pepeto has the audited exchange, the cross-chain bridge, and the working infrastructure Pepe never built. The cofounder who took Pepe from zero to $7 billion architects this project, and a former Binance executive shapes the listing strategy.

With the Binance listing approaching, these projections mirror BNB’s trajectory from $0.15 at ICO to over $700 once real trading activity powered the token. Staking at 188% APY grows every position daily before listing day. The wealth that changed lives in every prior cycle was captured by wallets that entered infrastructure presales while others hesitated, and Pepeto’s confirmed Binance listing will permanently eliminate this entry along with the 150x math attached to it.

XRP Price Prediction: Why $100 Demands More Capital Than Crypto Has Ever Seen

XRP trades at $1.30 according to CoinMarketCap with an $80 billion market cap. Hitting $100 would require a valuation above $5.7 trillion, exceeding the entire crypto market’s current $2.38 trillion capitalization by more than two times. The bullish xrp price prediction from ChatGPT targets $3.50 to $6 if the CLARITY Act passes in late April, delivering 160% to 340% from current levels, according to 24/7 Wall St.

Even reaching $10 demands a $570 billion valuation that rivals Ethereum at its historic peak. The xrp price prediction is constructive long term, but the math confirms the largest percentage returns already happened for holders who entered under $0.20. From $1.30, the upside is measured in percentages while Pepeto measures it in multiples.

Conclusion

Goldman Sachs loaded $153.8 million into XRP ETFs and the token barely moved. That is the ceiling of an $80 billion asset. Pepeto sits at $0.0000001862 with a SolidProof audited exchange, 188% APY staking, and a Binance listing approaching.

A $1,000 entry targets $150,000 at a fraction of what Pepe achieved with nothing. XRP needs $5.7 trillion for $100. Pepeto needs a sliver of what Pepe reached for 150x. The gap is not close. Visit the Pepeto official website and secure the entry that the xrp price prediction will never offer you at this stage.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

FAQs

Is $100 a realistic target for the xrp price prediction?

Reaching $100 requires a $5.7 trillion market cap. Most analysts see $3.50 to $6 as realistic if the CLARITY Act passes.

Why does Pepeto offer stronger return math than XRP from here?

At $0.0000001862 with 420 trillion supply, matching Pepe’s ATH delivers 150x, a multiple XRP at $80 billion cannot produce.

What impact does Goldman Sachs buying XRP ETFs have on price?

Goldman holds $153.8M in XRP ETFs, confirming institutional interest, but XRP remains rangebound until the CLARITY Act advances.

The post XRP Price Prediction: Can XRP Price Ever Reach The $100 Dream ? While Pepeto Delivers the True 150x Entry appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Kiyosaki ties the 1974 petrodollar system to today’s rising oil prices and growing global conflict risks.

• The shift from pensions to 401(k)s after ERISA left millions of baby boomers without guaranteed retirement income.

• Kiyosaki recommends gold, silver, and Bitcoin as real stores of value amid dollar weakness and inflation.

• He calls on schools to teach financial literacy, a message he has repeated since writing Rich Dad Poor Dad in 1997.

Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, has renewed his warnings about the U.S. economy. He links two major 1974 policy shifts to today’s financial instability.

The “Rich Dad” author points to the petrodollar system and the passage of ERISA as turning points. According to Kiyosaki, those decisions have now created conditions that threaten millions of Americans, particularly retiring baby boomers facing an uncertain financial future.

The Petrodollar and Rising Oil Prices

In 1974, the U.S. dollar moved away from the gold standard and became backed by oil. This shift created the petrodollar system, which has shaped global trade for decades. However, Kiyosaki argues that this arrangement is now under serious pressure in 2026.

He posted on X, warning that “the world stands on the edge of world war over oil.” Rising oil prices are pushing inflation higher across food and fuel markets. These increases are hitting everyday consumers hard as purchasing power continues to weaken.

The U.S. also carries one of the largest debt burdens in its history. Kiyosaki notes that whole countries and individuals are deeply in debt simultaneously. This convergence of debt and rising commodity prices creates a fragile economic environment.

He continues to recommend holding gold, silver, and Bitcoin as alternatives to fiat currency. These assets, in his view, represent real money that retains value over time. His long-standing position has not changed, even as market conditions shift.

ERISA, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Education

The 1974 passage of ERISA marked a major transition in how Americans save for retirement. Before that year, most employees received guaranteed lifetime income through pension plans. After ERISA, the shift toward 401(k)s, IRAs, and RRSPs transferred investment risk to individuals.

Kiyosaki warns that millions of baby boomers will soon discover their retirement savings fall short. Social Security and Medicare are also facing serious funding challenges, he says. Many retirees may find themselves without stable income once they stop working.

He raises a broader concern about financial literacy in schools. “Why do our schools not teach the subject of money to students?” he wrote. This question, which he first raised in Rich Dad Poor Dad in 1997, remains central to his message today.

Kiyosaki encourages people to invest in their personal financial education. He acknowledges that while many credible teachers exist on YouTube, there are also unreliable sources. He advises people to stay alert and verify the information they consume carefully.

The post Robert Kiyosaki Warns 1974 Economic Shifts Are Now Reshaping Financial Futures in 2026 appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Central bank gold holdings crossed $4 trillion, exceeding $3.9 trillion in foreign-held U.S. Treasuries in early 2026.

• Global central banks purchased 863 tonnes of gold in 2025, marking three consecutive years of record-level buying.

• Gold dropped from $5,608 to $4,676 amid Iran war inflation pressures, yet institutional price targets remain above $5,400.

• The 2022 freeze of $300 billion in Russian reserves triggered a structural move by central banks toward unfreezable gold assets.

Gold reserves held by the world’s central banks have crossed a critical threshold in early 2026. For the first time, the collective value of sovereign gold holdings — roughly $4 trillion — now exceeds the $3.9 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities held by foreign governments.

The shift represents the most consequential change in global reserve composition since the dollar displaced the British pound sterling decades ago.

Central Banks Drive Structural Gold Accumulation

The scale of central bank gold purchases has been consistent and growing. In 2025, central banks collectively bought 863 tonnes of gold. That marks the third consecutive year above 1,000 tonnes when unreported purchases estimated by the World Gold Council are factored in.

Poland added 20 tonnes in February alone. China’s central bank has maintained purchases for over 15 consecutive months.

Meanwhile, global gold ETF holdings reached an all-time high of 4,171 tonnes, reflecting broad institutional participation beyond sovereign buyers.

As analyst Shanaka Perera noted on social media: “The buying is not speculative. It is structural. It is central banks replacing the asset that can be frozen with the asset that cannot.”

The catalyst for this shift traces back to February 2022. That month, the United States and Europe immobilized approximately $300 billion in Russian central bank reserves held in Western financial institutions. The message to non-aligned central banks was direct — reserves held in foreign bonds carry political risk.

Gold Price Correction Masks Long-Term Momentum

Gold currently trades at $4,676, down from $5,608 in January. The decline stems largely from short-term war-driven market mechanics.

The Iran conflict pushed oil above $140, driving inflation and keeping the U.S. Federal Reserve’s rates at 3.50 to 3.75 percent. Higher real yields have temporarily made the dollar more attractive relative to gold.

The same conflict that is straining U.S. strategic influence at the Strait of Hormuz is, at least in the near term, supporting dollar strength through inflationary channels. Gold is therefore caught between short-term rate pressures and longer-term reserve diversification trends.

Major financial institutions have not revised their bullish outlook. JPMorgan and Wells Fargo project targets between $6,100 and $6,300. Goldman Sachs forecasts $5,400 by year-end. Institutional buyers appear to be accumulating during the dip rather than exiting positions.

The broader context remains unchanged. Gold cannot be frozen by executive order, does not settle through SWIFT, and requires no foreign custodian.

That combination of properties, rather than any speculative thesis, continues to drive sovereign demand. The $4 trillion crossover reflects a measured, ongoing rebalancing of global reserve strategy — one tonne at a time.

The post Gold Reserves Top $4 Trillion, Surpassing Foreign-Held U.S. Treasuries for the First Time appeared first on Blockonomi.

XRP trades near $1.32. April has recorded the highest average monthly returns for XRP since 2014 at 24.8%. The OCC final rule took effect on April 1, enabling Ripple’s conditionally approved National Trust Bank to move forward with expanded digital asset custody operations, while the Senate Banking Committee markup of the CLARITY Act remains scheduled for the second half of the month. 

Taurox, an AI-driven trading protocol, is equipped to respond to these developments through autonomous agents that deliver diversified, risk-managed returns to stakers. 

Handling XRP Supply Dynamics and Regulatory Timelines with Taurox’s Methodical Framework

XRP faces ongoing pressure from the April 1 escrow release of 1 billion tokens combined with regulatory milestones, resulting in moderate volatility and repeated 20-30% price movements for holders despite institutional progress. Taurox presents a steadier solution by uniting deposits of USDT, BTC, or XRP inside one central trading pool guided by autonomous agents. These agents are created by an international network of developers, quants, and AI engineers to achieve reliable proportional profits. 

Each agent is limited to no more than 2% of total pool assets to reduce concentration risk, with KYA tiers ensuring strategies stay within conservative, moderate, or aggressive categories. Demanding Sharpe ratios of at least 1.5 and drawdown limits below 15%, Taurox generates more consistent outcomes than direct asset ownership or standard hedge funds that charge 2% management fees under any market circumstance.

Early Agent Submission Portal Open: Accelerating Strategy Integration

Taurox recently achieved an important roadmap acceleration by launching the Pre-KYA Registration Table. This gateway enables developers, quants, and AI specialists to submit trading agents early, before the full Know Your Agent framework activates. Early registrants gain front-of-line access to the Proving Ground for quicker testing and faster capital deployment. They also qualify for additional rewards from the Agent Creator Fund, which accounts for 10% of total TAUX supply. Strategists with proven systems now have a prime window to secure early positioning inside the Taurox ecosystem.

Taurox Operational Framework: AI Strategies with Layered Risk Protections

Taurox collects staker contributions into one central trading pool and issues txTokens valued at the current net asset value per share, starting at $1.00. The protocol reserves 15% of assets in stablecoins to support liquidity and allocates the balance through a performance-weighted system. Agents implement strategies such as statistical arbitrage using secure on-chain vaults or limited-access CEX accounts. 

Before activation, each agent completes evaluation in the Proving Ground with sponsor capital until it satisfies statistical thresholds, such as a minimum of 500 trades for high-frequency approaches. Protective measures consist of 2% daily loss limits, 5% single-trade exposure caps, and an automatic 5% pool-wide drawdown halt. Gradual reallocation procedures help prevent abrupt liquidations, and KYA classification confirms that agents adhere strictly to their designated risk parameters within a transparent and auditable structure.

TAUX Economic Model: Capped Supply Enhanced by Systematic Burns

TAUX maintains a fixed supply of 2 billion tokens with no possibility of additional minting after launch, removing any dilution risk. In contrast to standard hedge funds, Taurox imposes no base fees and retains only 5% of gross profits, acquired directly on the open market. Thirty percent of this revenue is sent permanently to a dead address for burning, while seventy percent is directed to the DAO treasury. 

The remaining profit share follows a tiered model that prioritizes stakers, allocating 80% for returns between 0-20% and reducing progressively to 43% once returns surpass 300%, with all calculations based on high-water mark net gains. Allocations assign 40% to the presale, 15% to ongoing block-by-block staking rewards, 10% to milestone-based agent incentives, and 5% to the team under a six-month cliff vesting schedule.

Taurox Presale Progress: Entry Opportunity with Defined Growth Projections

The Taurox Presale has advanced into Phase 4 and surpassed $950K raised. TAUX is currently available at $0.018. Phase 4 participants can expect nearly 4.5x upside at listing when the token debuts at $0.08. If the protocol reaches a $1 billion pool, early backers could realize up to 103x returns with TAUX at $1.85. A $500 investment today would grow to roughly $2,220 at listing and approach $28,000 at the $1 valuation. 

The presale includes a one-month cliff and 20% monthly releases from months two to five, allowing immediate staking while limiting early transfers. Combined with 30% revenue burns, tiered profit sharing, 15% staking rewards, and an 8% security allocation, it presents attractive potential across both near-term and extended horizons.

Final Assessment: Taurox Establishing Reliable Yield Mechanisms in Dynamic Markets

Taurox integrates advanced AI autonomy with rigorous on-chain risk protocols and a built-in deflationary mechanism to establish a new benchmark in decentralized finance. Supported by contributions from developers around the world and sustained by ongoing token burns, the protocol maintains a clear path for measured growth as the need for consistent and transparent yield generation increases across market cycles.

Learn More

Buy TAUX: https://taurox.io

Whitepaper: https://docs.taurox.io/

Official Telegram: https://t.me/tauroxlabs

Official X/Twitter: https://x.com/TauroxProtocol

The post Taurox (TAUX) Pre-KYA Opening Announcement Secures Renewed Interest From (Ripple) Investors appeared first on Blockonomi.

In the first quarter of 2026, three major companies made massive Bitcoin sales, in what appears to be a significant change in their treasury strategies.

As the broader financial market reels under geopolitical turmoil, Riot Platforms, MARA Holdings, and Nakamoto have collectively offloaded over 19,000 BTC during the first three months of the year.

Riot Platforms

First up is Riot Platforms, which reportedly sold $289.5 million worth of Bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026. The company sold 3,778 BTC at an average of $76,626 per coin. By March’s end, Riot held 15,680 BTC, including 5,802 coins pledged as collateral. While it has yet to explain the reason for selling Bitcoin, it is important to note that the firm has been expanding into AI and high-performance computing.

The company mined 1,473 BTC in Q1 2026, slightly less than the 1,530 BTC mined in Q1 2025. Overall, in 2025, Riot reported record yearly revenue of $647.4 million, which is nearly 72% rise over the previous year’s $376.7 million.

Commenting on the 2025 performance, its CEO and Director, Jason Les, stated,

“2025 marked a watershed year for Riot, defined by a strategic evolution in our business that has transformed our future trajectory. With proven development expertise, a world-class asset base of readily available power in key data center markets, and over $1.9 billion in liquidity, we are uniquely equipped to aggressively scale our infrastructure footprint. “

MARA Holdings

Meanwhile, MARA Holdings sold a much larger amount of Bitcoin. Between March 4 and March 25, MARA sold 15,133 BTC for around $1.1 billion. The company said the sales were part of a strategic adjustment to its balance sheet. Most of the proceeds were used to repurchase about $1 billion in 0% convertible senior notes due in 2030 and 2031.

The latest decision represents a departure from the company’s HODL strategy. MARA also cut roughly 15% of its workforce during the period as part of a broader transformation.

Nakamoto

Nakamoto, on the other hand, sold approximately 284 BTC in March and ended up earning about $20 million at an average of $70,422 per coin. The company had previously acquired 5,342 BTC since August 2025 at an average price of $118,171 per BTC. The sale reflected a decrease from the acquisition price.

Nakamoto described the sale as part of liquidity and capital management, which aims to support operations, reinvest in businesses, and cover working capital for recent acquisitions such as BTC Inc. and UTXO Management GP, LLC. Despite the sales, the company asserted that Bitcoin remains a long-term treasury asset.

The post Riot, MARA, and Nakamoto Offload Massive Bitcoin Holdings in Q1 – Here’s the Breakdown appeared first on CryptoPotato.

A tradition started in early 2026 when the US attacked Venezuela and captured its leader and his wife in the early hours of Saturday morning under Trump’s orders. Iran was also attacked during the first day of the weekend.

Perhaps the most likely reason for this is the fact that all (well, almost all) financial markets are closed at the time, and there won’t be massive turbulence for investors and the US economy. However, this narrative doesn’t apply to the always-open cryptocurrency market, which tends to feel the impact of these actions immediately and the most.

The previous weekend was expected to be volatile, but it wasn’t, at least until Sunday evening when the futures legacy markets opened. This one, though, is Easter in the US, and, unless there are some major developments on the US/Israel-Iran front, it’s likely to remain calm.

Calmness Ahead?

Bitcoin has indeed traded sideways for the past 24 hours, showing a minor increase to just over $67,000 as of press time. This follows more enhanced volatility during the middle of the week, which included a dip to a month low of $65,000 and a surge to $69,200, where it was rejected and driven back down to under $66,000. Even Trump’s reiterated warning on Saturday couldn’t really shake it.

This sluggishness now could be regarded as the calm before the storm, though. Michaël van de Poppe noted that price fluctuations are likely to return next week before “we start to accelerate into either direction.” Interestingly, the analyst believes BTC will be heading north given the current fearful sentiment, a narrative recently outlined by Santiment as well.

Extremely low volatility on the markets.

I think that we’ll have a slow Easter and then the volatility comes back again next week before we start to accelerate into either direction.

Honestly, given the entire sentiment, I would assume we’re going to see upwards momentum on…

— Michaël van de Poppe (@CryptoMichNL) April 3, 2026

Eventful Month?

The aforementioned warning by Trump, though, gives Iran 48 hours to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or ‘all hell will reign down on them.’ This deadline expires on Monday, shortly after Wall Street reopens. Consequently, it’s likely to bring more volatility in either case – if Iran concurs with Trump or if the POTUS acts on his threats.

Before that, Trump warned that the US will begin targeting Iran’s “bridges next, then power plants.” He also believes the US can “easily” open the Strait, take the oil, and make a fortune.

Consequently, the analysts from The Kobeissi Letter noted that April is “going to be a highly eventful month” as the war “will continue for now and the critical energy infrastructure that has been spared so far is the next target.”

America is waking up to some major news this morning:

At 10:41 PM ET last night, President Trump said that the US will begin targeting Iran’s “bridges next, then power plants.”

And now, President Trump has announced that the US can “easily open the Straight of Hormuz, take the…

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) April 3, 2026

The post Boring Weekend, Explosive Month? Here’s What to Expect in April for Bitcoin appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s calmness saw a brief and minor break as the asset jumped by several hundred dollars to near $67,600 for the first time since Thursday after Trump’s latest warning against Iran.

The US President gave the Middle Eastern country 48 hours to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or “all hell will reign down on them.”

What’s particularly interesting about this reiteration of the previous 10-day warning is the fact that it expires at 10:05 AM ET on Monday, April 6. That would be just 35 minutes after Wall Street had opened for trading after a 3-day weekend.

The analysts at The Kobeissi Letter believe this statement increases the likelihood that the next 48 hours will be “highly eventful.”

BREAKING: President Trump’s “48-hour warning” to Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz expires at 10:05 AM ET on Monday, April 6th.

This also happens to be 35 minutes after the US stock market reopens after the 3-day weekend.

We will be covering the highly eventful next 48 hours.

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) April 4, 2026

While the US stock market is closed now, the cryptocurrency space is not. The 24/7-hour trading industry typically tends to react to such statements immediately, but this particular one couldn’t really shake BTC.

The largest digital asset traded at around $67,000, where it has been for the past day or so, and jumped slightly to $67,600 before it was stopped.

Most larger-cap alts are in a similar state, with ETH trading at $2,050, and XRP is just inches above $1.30.

The post BTC Sees Mild Volatility as Trump Escalates With 48-Hour Iran Warning appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The cross-border token of the Ripple ecosystem has presented some mind-blowing price rallies in a few previous market cycles, with the latest example coming after the US presidential elections in late 2024 to mid-2025.

However, it has been in a free-fall state since the July 2025 all-time high of $3.65, currently trading more than 60% away from that peak. Many analysts remain bullish on its future price performance, though, including EGRAG CRYPTO, who recently published a post claiming that XRP’s chart now presents “one of the best buying opportunities and upside potential.”

10x XRP?

The post, dubbed the “red chart,” acknowledges that the cross-border token has underperformed lately, but it has happened in the past. In fact, the previous such falling wedge pattern began in 2020 when the asset exploded to a local peak of over $2.00, only to correct to under $0.60 at the end of it in late 2024.

Then came the aforementioned rally that drove XRP to $3.40 by January 2025 and the new peak in July of the same year. Now, with the token erasing over half of its value in months, the triangle could be close to completion, but it would still need to drop to a “crystal clear” bottom of somewhere around $0.83 to confirm the thesis.

If it does, then it could head toward the cycle’s new peak of $8.30, which would be “the simplest 10x trade of your life.” However, the analyst warned that a close above $1.80 in the short term would invalidate the falling wedge, while a break below the $0.83 bottom would mean “we are in serious trouble.”

#XRP – The RED Chart :

It’s red… but it’s offering one of the best buying opportunities and upside potential for #XRP.

Closing above $1.80 = invalidation of the falling wedge
Cross of the 2 red lines is coming = Bearish

Otherwise:
Bottom target: crystal clear →… pic.twitter.com/TcXESiXvzK

— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) April 3, 2026

Here’s the $8 Target Again

EGRAG CRYPTO has dabbled with an $8 price target for XRP on a couple of occasions lately, including in another analysis based on the asset’s Fibonacci extensions. In fact, this was actually the more modest and conservative prediction, as the most bullish case scenario would place the token at over $20 or even up to $27. And, these targets were to be reached by August 2027.

While these numbers might sound unreasonable at the time being, we asked ChatGPT and Gemini whether there’s something we are not seeing. Both AI solutions concluded that reaching $8 is “not impossible,” but said the actual chances of reaching anywhere near $27 are slim to none by next year.

The post Is This the Best XRP Buying Opportunity Setup? Analyst Maps Out 10x Ripple Strategy appeared first on CryptoPotato.

With BTC’s price compressed below $70,000 and almost 50% away from its October 2025 all-time high of over $126,000, the overall sentiment within the cryptocurrency community remains deeply negative.

The ongoing war and uncertainty about the fate of the CLARITY Act are also contributing to investors’ grim outlook, but the analysts from Santiment recently revealed that this could be a blessing in disguise.

Record Fear Could Be Good

The analytics company has long been a proponent of Warren Buffett’s immortal advice for investors – be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy. Santiment has explicitly reaffirmed this thesis for the cryptocurrency industry, which is particularly susceptible to overblown emotions.

In the latest post on the matter, the analysts acknowledged that social media platforms such as X, Reddit, Telegram, and others have shown the “highest ratio of bearish discussions (fear) since February 28th” for bitcoin. At the time, the US and Israel first struck Iran, beginning what has now become a prolonged war.

The company added that “FUD has crept back in with the community showing a key lack of optimism,” as social media indicated that this weekend’s ratio of just 0.81 bullish comments per 1.00 bearish ones is “the lowest” since the war began. However, Santiment believes this is “usually a common ingredient for prices rebounding.”

“Remember that markets typically move the opposite direction of the crowd’s expectations. So even with ongoing “what-ifs” that are impacting the market’s ceiling right now (such as the Iran war and Clarity Act), a high level of FUD like this is a good sign that things can turn positive sooner rather than later.”

F&G Index Confirms

Alternative.me’s popular Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index reaffirmed Santiment’s claim that fear continues to dominate the market. Moreover, it has been in an ‘extreme fear’ state for over a month, with a brief exception in mid-March when BTC pumped to $76,000, only to be rejected and pushed below $70,000 within days.

History shows that BTC indeed tends to bounce back following long periods of time spent in ‘extreme fear.’ The same can be said about ‘extreme greed,’ as evident from the chart below. However, the current landscape is mostly influenced by the war against Iran, and FUD might continue as long as there’s no decisive outcome.

The post Bitcoin Enters Weekend With Highest Fear Levels in a Month: Here’s Why That’s Good appeared first on CryptoPotato.