The CLARITY Act's survival highlights the fragile nature of bipartisan cooperation and signals potential shifts in crypto regulation dynamics.

The post CLARITY Act survives near-collapse after last-minute Senate compromise appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is reshaping global energy markets, increasing coal demand and highlighting geopolitical vulnerabilities.

The post Iran conflict boosts coal demand as Strait of Hormuz remains closed: WSJ appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The lapse in the US waiver on Russian oil sanctions could tighten global oil supply, potentially elevating inflation and delaying rate cuts.

The post US Treasury allows sanctions waiver on Russian seaborne oil to lapse, raising global supply concerns appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

India's semiconductor ambitions gain momentum, potentially reshaping global supply chains and fostering technological self-reliance.

The post Tata Electronics partners with ASML to build India’s first semiconductor fab appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

India's stock market may face reduced passive inflows and investment as AI hardware demand boosts Taiwan and Korea, impacting global rankings.

The post India’s stock market risks dropping out of top five as AI rallies boost Taiwan and Korea appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Open Heads to Iconic Glen Abbey Golf Club for June 8, 2026 Event

The Bitcoin Open, a combined golf and poker tournament organized by Bitcoin Sports Network and Satstreet, is scheduled for June 8, 2026, at Glen Abbey Golf Club in Oakville, Ontario. The event will take place at the club during its 50th anniversary year.

Glen Abbey Golf Club, designed by Jack Nicklaus and opened in 1976, is one of Canada’s most recognized golf venues. It has hosted the Canadian Open multiple times and is known for its championship-level layout and history in professional golf. The course is located approximately 30 minutes west of Toronto and serves as a public golf facility with a significant legacy in Canadian sports.

The Bitcoin Open consists of a scramble-format golf tournament on the main championship course during the day, followed by a Texas Hold’em poker tournament in the evening. The golf portion uses a team scramble format, typically with groups of four players. The field size is limited, with organizers noting strong demand and a reduced number of remaining team spots as of mid-May 2026.

Prizes for the event include two separate hole-in-one awards, each consisting of one Bitcoin. Additional golf prizes cover the longest drive and closest to the pin. Golf winners will also receive tickets to the 2027 Bitcoin Golf Championship, scheduled to take place in Nashville, Tennessee, ahead of the 2027 Bitcoin Conference. The winner of the poker tournament receives $5,000 CAD in stablecoins.

A list of hole sponsors for the event has been announced. These include APX Lending, Tetra Digital Group, The Canadian Bitcoin Conference, Satstreet, True North Airways, Ledn, Gator Mining Inc., Wealthsimple, CAD DIGITAL, PRIVATEDEBT Partners, McCarthy Tetrault, and Samara Asset Group.

Bitcoin Sports Network operates as an organizer of Bitcoin-themed sports and lifestyle events, including golf tournaments held in conjunction with major Bitcoin conferences. Satstreet, a Canadian Bitcoin-focused company, is co-hosting the event and serving as one of the hole sponsors. The two organizations are collaborating on this Canadian edition of The Bitcoin Open.

The event is open to participants from the Bitcoin community, including builders, investors, and others active in the industry. Registration is handled through the official event website, with tickets covering both the golf and poker components. The schedule includes on-course activities, meals, and networking periods at the venue.

This marks the first time The Bitcoin Open is held at Glen Abbey. Previous Bitcoin Sports Network golf events have taken place in locations such as Las Vegas, often timed near larger Bitcoin conferences. The Canadian event is positioned as a standalone gathering in the Toronto area.

Glen Abbey’s 50th anniversary provides additional context for the timing. Since its opening, the club has been a central part of Canadian golf, training professionals and hosting amateur and professional competitions.

This post Bitcoin Open Heads to Iconic Glen Abbey Golf Club for June 8, 2026 Event first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Juan Galt.

Bitcoin Magazine

Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Raises Bitcoin ETF Stake 16% to $566 Million in Q1 2026

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company has raised its position in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), reporting ownership of 14,721,917 shares valued at $565,616,051 as of March 31, 2026, according to a 13F filing released today. 

That marks a 16% increase from the 12,702,323 shares the fund held at the end of Q4 2025.

The disclosure extends a now-unbroken accumulation streak that began in Q4 2024, when Mubadala first disclosed bitcoin exposure worth at least $436 million. The fund added shares through a Q1 2025 filing that showed 8,726,972 shares at $408.5 million, then surged to 12.7 million shares worth $630.6 million by December 31, 2025 — a 46% jump in a single quarter. Today’s filing adds another 2 million shares to that ledger, pushing the position past the half-billion dollar mark for the third straight quarter.

Mubadala manages a global portfolio exceeding $330 billion in assets across technology, healthcare, infrastructure, private equity, and public markets, with its mandate centered on generating returns for the Abu Dhabi government while reducing the emirate’s dependence on oil revenues. Bitcoin, accessed through the regulated IBIT structure, has become one of the fund’s most visible public market positions. 

As of Q4 2024, IBIT was already Mubadala’s second-largest holding by a wide margin, trailing only a longer-term stake in Arm Holdings.

Abu Dhabi’s bitcoin investments

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign accumulation does not stop at Mubadala. Al Warda Investments, an entity tied to the Abu Dhabi Investment Council — itself operating under the Mubadala umbrella — has also been building an IBIT position, reporting 8.2 million shares worth approximately $408 million at year-end 2025. The two Abu Dhabi vehicles combined to hold more than $1 billion in IBIT as of December 31, marking a milestone for Gulf Cooperation Council sovereign participation in regulated bitcoin products.

The Q1 2026 filing arrives against a backdrop of broader institutional and governmental interest in bitcoin. Goldman Sachs disclosed approximately $2.36 billion in total crypto exposure through IBIT and other vehicles, while Jane Street reported 20.3 million IBIT shares worth $790 million at Q4 2025 year-end. 

On the sovereign front, Texas became the first U.S. state to purchase bitcoin for a strategic reserve during the same period.

On a similar note, new financial disclosures show the Trump family trust bought shares of several bitcoin-linked companies — including Coinbase, MARA Holdings and Strategy — during the first quarter of 2026 as the administration advances a more crypto-friendly policy agenda. 

The filings revealed thousands of trades worth between $220 million and $750 million overall. 

This post Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Raises Bitcoin ETF Stake 16% to $566 Million in Q1 2026 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Gemini Stock Jumps After Winklevoss Twins Make $100M Bitcoin Bet on Company Future

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss made their boldest statement yet about Gemini Space Station’s future: a $100 million strategic investment into their own company, funded not with cash but with Bitcoin. 

The announcement, paired with a first-quarter earnings report that showed 42% revenue growth year-over-year, sent GEMI shares climbing more than 20% in after-hours trading Thursday night.

Gemini (NASDAQ: GEMI) reported total revenue of $50.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, driven by a surge in services and OTC revenue. Services and interest income jumped 122% to $24.5 million, while credit card revenue climbed 300% to $14.7 million. The net loss narrowed to $109 million, an improvement from the $141 million loss recorded in the same quarter of 2025. Shares closed at $5.26 on Wednesday before the earnings release, then hit $6.33 in extended trading — representing a gain of over 20%.

Shares were up over 30% this morning before settling at the time of writing. The headline move, however, was the Bitcoin-denominated investment. Winklevoss Capital Fund purchased 7.1 million shares at $14 per share — nearly triple the stock’s recent market price of around $4.92. 

Tyler Winklevoss, the company’s CEO, said in a statement: “We believe the market has significantly undervalued Gemini, and that this investment will allow us to set up the company for its next phase of growth.” 

The $14 entry price, paid in Bitcoin, signals the twins’ conviction that both the company and the flagship digital asset have room to run.

Bitcoin itself has traded in a tight band this week, with the coin closing at $81,051 on May 14 and hovering around $80,000 through the prior several sessions. That stability comes after a bruising stretch earlier this year — BTC crashed more than 40% from its October 2025 peak of $126,000 to a low near $60,000 in February — a downturn that rattled Gemini’s exchange business and caused trading volumes to fall to $6.3 billion in Q1 from $13.5 billion a year earlier. 

Gemini’s rough couple months

The Winklevoss twins themselves were caught in that selloff, with blockchain analytics firm Arkham flagging a $130 million Bitcoin transfer into Gemini in March, widely interpreted as a sale. They later pulled funds back, withdrawing $42.77 million in BTC from the platform in April, a sign they were rebuilding their position as prices stabilized.

The earnings follows months of turbulence for the exchange. In February, Gemini cut 25% of its global workforce, exited the UK, EU, and Australian markets, and lost its COO, CFO, and Chief Legal Officer in a single week. 

Those events sparked a wave of shareholder class action suits alleging the company misled investors in its September 2025 IPO — priced at $28 per share and initially trading as high as $45.89 — about its true financial condition. The stock at one point fell below $5, a more than 89% decline from that peak.

One regulatory win gave the bulls ammunition. In April, Gemini received a Derivatives Clearing Organization license from the CFTC, opening the door to futures, options, and a broader marketplace strategy. Cameron Winklevoss, the company’s president, framed the licensing milestone as central to Gemini’s ambition to “evolve from a crypto company into a markets company.” 

This post Gemini Stock Jumps After Winklevoss Twins Make $100M Bitcoin Bet on Company Future first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

The Trump Family Trust Bought Bitcoin-Linked Stocks in First Quarter: Filing

Donald Trump’s family trust bought shares in several bitcoin-linked companies during the first quarter of 2026, according to a financial disclosure filed with the US Office of Government Ethics. These moves come as his administration advances a more supportive stance on digital assets.

The filing, submitted through two Form 278-T reports, shows more than 3,600 transactions between January and March with a total value ranging from $220 million to $750 million. Most of the activity focused on large-cap technology firms, banks, and index funds, yet a set of targeted purchases tied to the crypto sector has raised fresh ethics questions.

The disclosure lists nine purchases of Coinbase stock, with the largest transaction on Feb. 10 valued between $100,001 and $250,000. Coinbase stands as the largest US-based crypto exchange and plays a central role in retail and institutional trading infrastructure.

The trust reported two smaller purchases of MARA Holdings, one of the largest public Bitcoin mining firms, along with trades in Strategy, the company known for holding a large Bitcoin treasury. Strategy shares often move in line with Bitcoin price swings, which has made the stock a proxy for crypto exposure in equity markets.

The filing shows eight transactions involving Strategy Class A shares, including both purchases and sales. The largest purchase ranged between $50,001 and $100,000, while a January sale reached up to $50,000. The mix of buys and sells suggests active management rather than a passive position.

Beyond those names, the trust disclosed positions in other crypto-linked or fintech firms, including Robinhood, SoFi Technologies, and Block. These companies connect to digital assets through trading platforms, payments, or blockchain initiatives.

The Trump’s broader portfolio

Crypto-related trades represent a small share of the broader portfolio, which includes large positions in Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Boeing, with individual transactions reaching up to $5 million. The filing indicates strong gains across many of those holdings following a market rebound after a March selloff tied to geopolitical tensions.

The documents do not state whether Trump directed any trades. His assets sit in a family trust managed by his sons and external brokers. Ethics rules require disclosure of transactions but do not bar a sitting president from holding or trading stocks.

These Trump-linked purchase disclosures came as the Senate Banking Committee advanced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in a 15–9 vote, with Democratic Sens. Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joined Republicans to move the sweeping crypto market structure bill forward despite fierce opposition from Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats over consumer protection, illicit finance and Trump-related ethics concerns.

The markup exposed a growing Democratic divide on crypto policy, as a bipartisan bloc backed key DeFi compromise language while progressive lawmakers warned the bill creates loopholes that could weaken anti-money-laundering enforcement and securities protections.

This post The Trump Family Trust Bought Bitcoin-Linked Stocks in First Quarter: Filing first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

DMND and RootstockLabs Partner To Bring Stratum V2 To Merge-mining

Today DMND and RootstockLabs announce a new feature rollout intending to further the decentralization of Bitcoin mining. The new feature uses Stratum V2 to enable miners at the pool engaging in their own block template construction to also handle the selection and inclusion of merge-mined block commitments from the Rootstock (RSK) sidechain as well.

Merge-mining is a process by which multiple blockchains can share, or “reuse”, the same POW from the same set of miners. One blockchain, the child chain, structures its block headers to include the headers of the parent chain, i.e. the hash of the child chain’s block header is actually included inside a parent chain block (usually in the coinbase transaction), and software for the child chain is aware of this, actually validating part of the parent chain’s blocks in the process of verifying the child chain’s blocks.

This allows miners of the parent chain to mine multiple blockchains at once by simply including blockheader commitments in their coinbase transaction, and then mining blocks for the parent blockchain. When one is found for the parent chain, one is found for all of the child chains as well.

DMND’s integration allows miners to claim the sidechain rewards in rBTC (Rootstock’s bitcoin backed token whose reserves are managed by the federation operating the sidechain) directly on the sidechain, with no revenue sharing or intermediary pool custody.

There is potential for a dynamic like this to actually have the opposite impact on decentralization, but it is nonetheless an important development that will actually put such questions to the test in the real world.

Alejandro De La Torre, CEO and Co-Founder of DMND, had this to say: “The miner controls the merge mining and the miner gets paid for the merge mining. More delegation of control to miners is our key support for further decentralisation of the Bitcoin ecosystem.”

This post DMND and RootstockLabs Partner To Bring Stratum V2 To Merge-mining first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Shinobi.

THORChain’s suspected multichain exploit and emergency halt on May 15 has turned into another DeFi security incident, and another test of cross-chain trust.

Emergency controls moved through chain-specific halts, Halt All Trading, Halt Signing, Halt Chain Global, Halt Churning, and repeated global node-pause updates.

One public alert described the likely exploit affecting Bitcoin, Ethereum, BSC, and Base, resulting in more than $10.7 million in losses, revised from an earlier $7.4 million estimate.

Another security estimate put the loss near $10 million, including 36.75 BTC and about $7 million across BNB Chain, Ethereum, and Base.

The chain scope was later expanded in a TRM Labs assessment, which reported that the attacker drained more than $11 million across at least nine chains. Those chains included Avalanche, Dogecoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, and XRP, in addition to the initial four-chain framing. The figures may still move as the accounting is reconciled, but the available record points to a multichain infrastructure event touching several native-asset routes.

The halt, therefore, carried consequences beyond THORChain. Cross-chain liquidity is supposed to make crypto feel more useful, liquid, and connected. Yet the same design that lets assets move between isolated networks can also compress the response window when something breaks.

Related Reading

Kraken moves Bitcoin to Chainlink as bridge fears spread across DeFi

Kraken is rebuilding how Bitcoin moves through DeFi after the KelpDAO shock.

May 15, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In this case, DeFi's promise of seamless routing ran straight into the need for an emergency stop.

The Halt Became The Signal

The operational response is documented in the chain's emergency framework. THORChain's procedures describe network and chain halts as tools node operators can use when funds are at risk.

Its architecture relies on Bifrost observation, vaults, and threshold-signature signing to move native assets across chains without wrapping them.

Those controls can protect funds by stopping further activity. They also show that cross-chain infrastructure is a stack of observers, validators, vaults, signing logic, node operations, and emergency procedures.

When that stack is tested, the market asks whether a single bug can be patched and whether the system can remain credible while the response itself disrupts routing.

I think that distinction brings the THORChain incident into the broader DeFi story. Mature financial infrastructure is expected to fail safely, explain quickly, and restore confidence with a documented root cause.

DeFi often moves faster than that standard. It ships integrations, new chains, and liquidity routes before users and institutions have a clear way to price the full operational risk.

Related Reading

After the $16.5 billion in exploits, DeFi is now being forced toward the controls it once resisted

Aave’s rsETH bad debt shows DeFi’s next security crisis rests in broken assumptions across bridges, governance, collateral listings, and risk controls.

May 10, 2026 · Gino Matos

A compact confidence ladder captures the current state of record:

The Trust Discount Is Now Measurable

The damage from exploits rarely ends with the drained wallet. Immunefi's 2026 security findings put the average direct theft at $25 million, while the median loss fell to $2.2 million.

That gap shows a market where routine defenses may improve while the largest incidents still define confidence.

The same report found that the top five hacks in 2024 and 2025 accounted for 62% of stolen funds, and hacked tokens saw a median six-month decline of 61%.

Those token moves cannot be cleanly separated from market conditions or project-specific weakness in every case. Still, the pattern supports the core market reaction: exploits become long-tail business events.

They drain capital, consume team time, slow integrations, and make partners question whether the next failure will hit them indirectly.

The trust discount reflects an extra layer of skepticism toward a sector that wants to be treated as financial infrastructure, yet still produces failures that look like crisis drills.

Users, exchanges, market makers, custodians, and institutions require more evidence to trust a protocol's uptime, monitoring, key management, and emergency processes.

Recent cross-chain incidents reinforce that point. In the KelpDAO bridge exploit, attackers targeted off-chain verification and source-chain watching infrastructure rather than a conventional smart-contract bug.

The result was a false view of reality that led to valid-looking transactions releasing funds. Bridge-security fears have already influenced infrastructure decisions, including Kraken's move to use Chainlink CCIP for kBTC and future wrapped assets following the KelpDAO shock.

Related Reading

Chainlink emerges as the unlikely $3B winner of KelpDAO exploit as DeFi projects dump LayerZero

More than $3 billion in DeFi value is moving toward Chainlink’s CCIP after the KelpDAO exploit exposed weaknesses in bridge verification.

May 11, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

That makes the THORChain halt feel less isolated. The sector is being forced to prove that the trust path across chains is observable, redundant, and controllable before billions of dollars of liquidity are routed through it.

For institutional users, the issue becomes operational due diligence. Cross-chain exposure touches custody policy, liquidity commitments, incident response, and counterparty reviews.

A protocol that routes native assets across chains has to prove that the monitoring and emergency process around that routing is as strong as the connectivity itself.

For builders, that changes what counts as progress. New routes and integrations can deepen liquidity, but they also create more surfaces for monitoring, key management, and incident response.

The next credibility gains will come from showing that controls scale with liquidity before a failure forces counterparties to revisit assumptions.

THORChain Carries A Compliance Layer Too

THORChain's position is especially sensitive because the protocol combines an attack surface with a routing role in major illicit-flow episodes.

As of TRM's report, the May 15 exploit had no public actor attribution. That caveat keeps the current incident separate from earlier laundering cases unless new evidence changes the record.

The same analysis described THORChain as a recurring rail for moving stolen funds, including flows tied to the Bybit and KelpDAO incidents.

That pressure was evident after Lazarus-linked Bybit funds moved through the protocol, when THORChain faced tensions between developers and validators.

Related Reading

Thorchain faces developer exodus amid North Korean money laundering scandal

A core contributor known as TCB warned that Thorchain could face a crisis if the network is framed as a money laundering facilitator.

Feb 28, 2025 · Gino Matos

Federal investigators attributed the February 2025 Bybit theft of about $1.5 billion in virtual assets to North Korea's TraderTraitor activity.

The FBI also urged private-sector crypto entities, including DeFi services and bridges, to block transactions to or from addresses linked to laundering.

That history sharpens the current episode. A protocol can be useful because it makes native cross-chain swaps efficient. The same utility can make it attractive to attackers and difficult for compliance teams to ignore.

Once a protocol is seen as both exploitable infrastructure and a route for illicit funds, counterparties have to price in more than just smart-contract risk.

They have to price operational interruption, screening exposure, and the chance that integrations become reputational liabilities.

RUNE price reaction stays secondary. Market data on May 16 put RUNE at around $0.44, down 21.90% over 24 hours.

The broader crypto market stood near $2.61 trillion with Bitcoin dominance at 60.2%. The market noticed the incident, but the more important question is whether liquidity providers, routing interfaces, wallet integrations, and compliance desks change behavior after the halt.

The important market signal will come from the next set of operational choices rather than from a one-day chart. Liquidity interfaces can route around protocols that introduce uncertainty; custodians and market makers can raise internal risk scores.

Compliance teams can demand better screening and incident records before supporting integrations. Those reactions are slower than a token selloff, but they are the way a security event becomes a durable trust discount.

That is the slower repricing institutions notice. It shows up in due diligence questions, integration queues, and risk limits long after the emergency halt leaves the alert feed.

The Next Test Is The Postmortem

The next test starts with more than a recovery message: THORChain needs to produce a clear postmortem, reconcile the final loss figure and chain count, explain the root cause without speculation, and show what changed in its vault, key-management, node, monitoring, and halt processes.

Recovery details may help contain user harm while leaving the infrastructure question intact.

If THORChain completes compensation, resumes safely, and documents a credible fix, the incident can remain a severe but contained confidence hit.

If the root cause remains unsettled, final accounting keeps changing, or integrations pull back, the event becomes another data point in a broader repricing of cross-chain DeFi.

That is the sector-level consequence. DeFi wants to present itself as a durable, always-on financial infrastructure.

Every major cross-chain exploit makes that claim harder to defend until the industry can show that the bridges, vaults, signing systems, and emergency controls connecting its markets are as mature as the capital they aim to attract.

The post THORChain exploit turns emergency chain halt into a DeFi trust test appeared first on CryptoSlate.

US-listed Bitcoin ETF flows have suffered their most severe weekly capital flight since the end of January, with investors pulling exactly $1 billion from the products.

The primary catalyst for the sudden institutional risk aversion appears to be the shifting US economic backdrop.

CryptoSlate's data show that rising inflation concerns, alongside steep ETF outflows, led Bitcoin's price to fall around 3% over the past week to $78,074 as of press time.

US Bitcoin ETF flows register largest weekly outflow in 5 months

Data compiled by SoSoValue indicates that the $1 billion ETF outflow snapped a six-week streak of consecutive positive inflows. During this reporting period, the US-listed funds had absorbed approximately $3.4 billion in net flows.

However, the net withdrawal over the past seven days totaled roughly 14,000 Bitcoin, marking a distinct pause in the recovery of institutional demand that had been building steadily since early April.

Despite the severity of the weekly outflows, Ecoinometrics, a Bitcoin-focused analytical platform, characterized the number as a period of tactical hesitation near a critical macroeconomic decision point, rather than a wholesale unwind of institutional positioning.

According to the firm, the broader structural recovery pattern for digital assets remains largely intact, as net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs have remained positive over the past 30 days.

US inflation data explains why ETF demand cracked

In a recent market note, Coinbase, the largest US-based exchange, emphasized that returning inflationary pressures are actively limiting the potential for a broader liquidity-driven rally in digital assets.

According to the exchange's analysis, hotter-than-expected Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) prints have forced financial markets to reprice inflation risk rapidly.

While initial jobless claims remain low, pointing to a resilient labor market, falling real wages and declining consumer sentiment suggest underlying economic strain.

Ecoinometrics corroborated this view, highlighting that investors were growing increasingly uneasy about aggressively adding risk exposure without a clearer picture of the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy steps.

The firm pointed to underlying details within the latest CPI report as a cause for concern. While a jump in headline inflation was largely anticipated following a spike in global energy prices linked to recent geopolitical conflicts, the acceleration of core inflation and core services inflation presents a more structural problem.

Because these core measures strip out volatile food and energy costs, their upward trajectory suggests persistent, sticky price pressures embedded within the broader economy, rather than a temporary external shock.

As a result, traditional risk assets, including US equities and the Bitcoin ETFs, are digesting the near-term monetary uncertainty rather than transitioning aggressively out of a risk-on regime.

It added that the foundational demand that drove billions of dollars into crypto ETFs throughout the spring has paused, but it has not structurally fractured.

What could restart Bitcoin's liquidity trade?

Considering the above, the next phase for the Bitcoin funds depends on whether last week's withdrawals become a pattern.

Ecoinometrics explained that the market can treat the $1 billion exit as a reset after a strong six-week recovery if ETF flows stabilize.

However, the signal becomes more concerning if outflows continue, as it would suggest that institutional demand is no longer absorbing macro pressure at the same pace.

Meanwhile, US inflation data would be the second test. Coinbase analysts noted that a sustained “beta expansion” will likely require a definitive improvement in systemic liquidity or a clear downward trend in inflation. Beta expansion is a measure of BTC's volatility and returns relative to the broader market.

This means that a cooler run of data would help rebuild the case for improved liquidity and give traders more confidence that the Fed can eventually shift toward easier policy.

However, a further rise in core or services inflation would likely keep yields elevated and continue to limit Bitcoin's ability to expand beyond its current range.

The post Bitcoin ETF flows reverse as US funds shed $1B amid inflation fears appeared first on CryptoSlate.

A new global financial crisis is not confirmed, but the path toward one is now visible enough to map.

The sequence starts with debt and oil before it reaches credit. Long-end sovereign yields and Brent crude are already close enough to stress levels to make the policy squeeze urgent.

To close out the week, the US 30-year Treasury yield was near 5.109%, the UK 30-year gilt was near 5.857%, Brent was near $108.54, and the VIX was near 18.53.

Those numbers point to a market moving toward the part of the map where a bond shock and an oil shock can start forcing other markets to respond.

The distinction is practical. A 30-year Treasury yield above 5.25%, a UK 30-year gilt above 6%, or sustained Brent above $115 would all worsen the debt-service and inflation problem.

But a 2008-style event needs more than expensive government debt and energy. It needs stress to migrate into credit, volatility, financial conditions, funding markets, and forced selling.

The broad data still shows a different picture. US high-yield option-adjusted spreads were still only 2.82% on May 13, below the long-term average of 5.19%.

A later FRED update put the same credit-spread family at 2.76% for May 14. The Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index was still -0.524 for the week ending May 8, and negative NFCI readings indicate looser-than-average financial conditions.

That leaves markets in a split state: the warning signals are close, but the confirmation signals have not arrived.

Related Reading

Global financial crisis fears grow as bond yields hit 1998 levels and Bitcoin drops below $80,000

Sovereign bond yields are nearing historic stress levels as inflation and energy shocks revive fears of a global financial crisis.

May 13, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The dashboard markets should watch

The closest breaks are the US 30-year, the UK 30-year, and Brent. The more important confirmation points are high-yield spreads, VIX, and NFCI.

A mechanical one-day gauge shows why the first group matters. If the US 30-year repeated its 9.6 basis-point daily move, it would reach 5.25% in roughly 1.5 trading days and 5.50% in roughly 4.

If the UK 30-year repeated its 20.6 basis-point move, 6% would be less than one trading day away. If Brent repeated its $2.82 daily gain, $115 would be two to three trading days away.

Treat those as distance markers, not forecasts. They show how close the market is to levels where the narrative changes.

Why bonds and oil break first

Long-end yields are the first pressure point because they transmit stress into almost everything else.

For governments, higher 30-year yields raise the cost of refinancing at the same time budgets are already under pressure. The IMF's April 2026 Fiscal Monitor said global public debt rose to just under 94% of GDP in 2025 and is projected to reach 100% by 2029, with public finances strained by rising interest burdens.

That makes every long-end yield spike more than a chart event. It raises the price of time for governments, households, banks, insurers, pensions, and companies that rely on long-duration valuations.

The transmission can arrive without a single dramatic failure. Higher long-end rates can lower the value of bond portfolios, pressure mortgage and corporate refinancing costs, and make equity valuations harder to defend.

They also force governments to choose between tighter budgets, heavier issuance, and higher interest bills. A move from stress to crisis can start quietly in duration markets before it shows up in layoffs, bank funding, or default risk.

Oil adds the second pressure channel. The EIA described the Strait of Hormuz as a critical chokepoint, with 2024 oil flows averaging about 20 million barrels per day, or roughly 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption.

The World Bank said Brent could average as high as $115 in 2026 under a severe-disruption scenario involving damage to critical oil and gas facilities and slow export recovery.

Related Reading

Bitcoin only has one path through 2026 because massive oil price contagion just spread to 8 major economies

Hormuz-driven oil stress is forcing policy shifts across 8 economies, leaving Bitcoin stuck between liquidity squeeze and support.

May 12, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Brent is central to the GFC question because it can keep inflation elevated, weaken real incomes, pressure margins, and reduce the room central banks have to cut rates if markets start to fall.

It does not need to directly break the banking system to make a subsequent credit event harder to fight.

In 2008 and 2020, policymakers could eventually move hard toward financial rescue. In this setup, the constraint is different.

Rescue too early, and inflation credibility comes under pressure. Wait too long, and financial stability can break first.

What would confirm the shift into systemic stress

The hard break requires more than the US 30-year alone. A 5.25% or 5.50% 30-year Treasury would be a major warning, but it would still be a warning.

The same holds for a 6% UK 30-year gilt or Brent above $115.

The confirmation would come from migration.

First, volatility would need to stop looking orderly. A VIX move through 25 would show equity investors paying up for protection.

A move through 30 would be a more serious risk-off signal, especially if it came while long yields and oil were still rising.

Second, credit would need to reprice. The high-yield spread, around 4.5% to 5.0%, is the more important line because it would indicate that investors are no longer treating the shock as a rate problem.

They would demand more compensation for default and liquidity risk.

That is the point at which the story shifts from macro pressure to credit stress. The distance from 2.82% to 4.5% is about 168 basis points.

That gap is why the current evidence falls short of a 2008-style credit event.

Third, financial conditions would need to tighten broadly. An NFCI crossing above zero would indicate that the stress is no longer confined to rates, oil, or equities.

It would mean money markets, debt markets, equity markets, and the banking system are collectively tighter than average.

Only after that would the real systemic channel come into view: funding pressure, collateral calls, liquidity holes, bank balance-sheet stress, and forced deleveraging.

That is the part that turns a harsh macro correction into a financial crisis.

On current evidence, that remains a second-order scenario. A reasonable 12-month range remains around 10% to 15%, rising toward 15% to 20% if the US 30-year breaks 5.25%, the UK 30-year breaks 6%, Brent stays above $115, and the VIX moves above 25.

A high-yield spread move through 4.5% would matter more than any single bond print because it would show credit catching the shock.

Where Bitcoin fits into the test

Bitcoin comes after the macro test.

The crypto market is large enough to react to the same liquidity forces driving stocks, bonds, and commodities. CryptoSlate's market pages show a total crypto market value of $2.6 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance around 60%.

The Bitcoin page shows BTC near $78,000 going into the weekend, down about 2.8% over 24 hours.

Recent CryptoSlate coverage has already shown why the Bitcoin signal is complicated. BTC has at times broken from US equities while oil, yields, and the dollar pressured stocks, with Bitcoin now below $80,000 even as the S&P 500 hits new records.

Related Reading

Bitcoin decouples from S&P 500 as oil, yields, and dollar pressure stocks

BTC’s break from stocks now depends on whether buyers can absorb oil, yield, and dollar pressure at the same time.

May 5, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Still, one or two decoupling sessions fall short of proving a durable regime change. If this remains a bond-and-oil shock without credit confirmation, Bitcoin may trade the usual mix of liquidity expectations, real-rate pressure, dollar moves, ETF flows, and risk appetite.

It can diverge for a session or two without proving that it has become a crisis hedge.

If the shock moves further into credit, the test becomes harder. In a true deleveraging phase, investors sell what they can, not only what they want to sell.

Bitcoin could trade like high-beta collateral first, especially if volatility rises and liquidity becomes scarce.

The bullish macro case would need to survive that phase. BTC would have to show investor demand, treating it as protection against fiscal stress, monetary disorder, or policy credibility risk after the forced-selling pressure subsides.

That is a higher bar than outperforming stocks on a mixed macro day.

The path also depends on what drives the selloff. A rates-led repricing tends to pressure long-duration assets and speculative exposure.

An oil-led inflation shock can hit risk appetite while also raising questions about the purchasing power of fiat. A credit-led break is harsher because it turns liquidity into a scarce asset.

Bitcoin's response across those three states would tell markets more than any single daily correlation print.

The line between correction and crisis

Markets are still short of saying 2008 is here. Yet they say the path to that kind of event is visible enough to monitor in real time.

The first part of the path is already close: long-end US and UK yields, oil, inflation pressure, and constrained central banks.

The second part is still missing: high-yield spreads above 4.5% to 5.0%, VIX above 25 to 30, and NFCI above zero.

That distinction means that if a new GFC-style event is developing, the bond and oil numbers should break first.

The confirmation comes only when credit, volatility, and financial conditions follow.

Until then, the label is a dangerous macro-correction risk rather than a confirmed systemic crisis.

The post Markets are moving toward a new global financial crisis. These are the tripwires that would confirm it appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Strategy agreed on May 15 to repurchase roughly $1.5 billion principal of its 2029 convertible notes for an estimated $1.38 billion in cash.

The firm told investors in its Form 8-K that it may fund the repurchase with available cash reserves, ATM sale proceeds, and/or Bitcoin sale proceeds. Strategy expects to cancel the repurchased notes, leaving about $1.5 billion of 2029 notes outstanding.

The filing adds a new role to Bitcoin on Strategy's balance sheet as a named funding option for near-term debt obligations.

Strategy built its public identity around relentless Bitcoin accumulation, buying during market downturns, funding purchases with convertible debt, and expanding its BTC pile to 818,869 BTC.

The company's 10-Q already states that it may sell Bitcoin to satisfy short- or long-term liquidity needs, even when other sources are available, if management determines that selling Bitcoin is more favorable.

The 8-K brings that disclosure language into contact with a specific, near-term obligation.

The debt calendar

Once the 2029 note repurchase closes, Strategy still has convertible note put-option dates under which holders may require cash repurchase at 100% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The first arrives Sept. 15, 2027, when $1.01 billion of 2028 notes become putable, equivalent to roughly 12,770 BTC at current prices. Mar. 1, 2028, brings $2 billion of 2030B notes, equivalent to roughly 25,286 BTC.

The next repurchase takes place on June 1, 2028, adding $1.5 billion of 2029 notes, equivalent to 18,965 BTC. On Sept. 15, 2028, it carries approximately $1.4 billion across the 2030A and 2031 series, worth roughly 17,747 BTC.

The calendar closes June 15, 2029, with $800 million of 2032 notes, equivalent to roughly 10,115 BTC. Post-buyback put exposure through June 2029, with approximately $6.71 billion, or about 84,900 BTC at current prices.

These are holder-put rights: options that noteholders may exercise based on market conditions, conversion economics, and refinancing alternatives on each date.

Strategy could fund any exercise through cash reserves, ATM proceeds, refinancing, or Bitcoin sales, and the mix will depend on conditions at each point in the calendar.

Strategy's own 10-Q notes that market perception of Bitcoin sales could trigger preemptive price movements and impair the company's ability to use BTC for liquidity, the clearest evidence that the company understands the perception risk inherent in naming Bitcoin as a funding option.

The price question

At a Bitcoin price of roughly $79,000, funding the current $1.38 billion repurchase entirely through Bitcoin sales would require about 17,448 BTC, approximately 2.1% of Strategy's 818,334 BTC holdings.

CoinGecko recently reported Bitcoin's 24-hour volume at around $39.5 billion, making the hypothetical sale about 3.5% of that volume. Routing through institutional OTC desks could limit the immediate exchange-visible effect.

Coinbase's institutional trading materials describe smart routing as a tool to reduce price effect on large trades and its OTC desk as designed for large, discreet block trades, though counterparty hedging and trader sentiment can still move Bitcoin price independently.

With roughly $2.25 billion in dollar reserves as of Apr. 26, ATM equity issuance, and refinancing all in the toolkit, Strategy has funding capacity to handle the current repurchase without selling Bitcoin.

Potential outcomes

If Bitcoin falls, equity issuance becomes expensive, and holders exercise put rights in a weak market, the debt calendar becomes a stress test.

Funding the entire $6.71 billion put calendar through Bitcoin sales at current prices would require roughly 84,900 BTC, about 10.4% of Strategy's stack.

Even partial BTC-funded repayments would attach a sell-flow estimate to each future put date, and Strategy's own 10-Q identifies that if the market perceives Bitcoin sales, preemptive price movement could impair the very asset Strategy would sell to raise cash, tightening the feedback loop at each subsequent calendar date.

If Strategy completes the current repurchase using cash and ATM proceeds, leaving Bitcoin untouched, it would reduce future 2029 put exposure by roughly $1.5 billion, and the broader calendar would read as routine liability management.

With equity-market appetite for MSTR shares intact and cash reserves in place, the company can treat Bitcoin as a non-monetized treasury position. Each repurchase Strategy routes through non-Bitcoin channels reinforces that reading, and the liquidity-option language in the filings stays theoretical.

Strategy's Bitcoin stack is the world's largest corporate position, and the company has built multiple liquidity channels to fund its obligations without selling Bitcoin.

The debt calendar stretching to June 2029 gives traders a fixed tool, with each put date a point at which noteholders can force a cash decision, and Bitcoin sale proceeds explicitly on the funding menu.

For now, Strategy's filings have moved Bitcoin from an accumulation phase asset to a named item in its liability management toolkit, and traders have the dates.

The post Strategy has put Bitcoin sales on the table for repurchases – but will it affect BTC price? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin’s latest retreat below $80,000 shows how quickly the bond market has reclaimed control of crypto trading, even after lawmakers advanced one of the industry’s most closely watched regulatory bills.

Data from CryptoSlate showed that the top asset was trading at $79,083 as of press time, down more than 3% after another failed attempt to hold above $82,000.

Blockchain analytical firm Santiment attributed the reversal to a “buy the rumor, sell the news” market reaction to the Senate Banking Committee's approval of the CLARITY Act. This was a policy milestone that would typically improve sentiment across digital assets by moving market-structure legislation closer to a full Senate vote.

However, the rally attempt faded as traders shifted their focus back to Treasurys.

The 10-year Treasury yield moved above 4.5% for the first time since June 2025, while the 30-year yield climbed toward 5.1%. Jim Bianco of Bianco Research said the long bond was only 8 basis points away from a fresh 19-year high.

That move has raised the return threshold for Bitcoin exposure. Higher yields make cash, bills, and longer-dated government debt more competitive, while BTC is trying to recover a key technical level.

Nicolai Sondergaard, a research analyst at Nansen, told CryptoSlate that rising yields are narrowing the compensation investors receive for holding assets such as Bitcoin.

According to him:

“The 10-year Treasury yield pressing toward multi-month highs is compressing the risk premium available to assets like BTC, which remain structurally sensitive to the real rate environment. At current levels, the cost of holding zero-yield assets rises meaningfully when alternatives offer 4.5% risk-free.”

The result is a market where crypto-specific progress is no longer enough to carry price action on its own. Washington has improved the industry’s policy outlook, but the rates market is setting the near-term allocation decision.

ETF outflows show where the rate pressure is landing

The pressure from the Treasurys is now showing up in one of Bitcoin’s most important demand channels: US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.

SoSoValue data show the funds were on pace for more than $700 million in weekly outflows, the largest weekly retreat since late January. The pullback removes a key source of spot demand as Bitcoin tries to reclaim the $82,000 area and move back above its 200-day moving average.

The ETF channel has become central to Bitcoin’s market structure since the funds began trading, providing institutions with a regulated, liquid way to add exposure. When those flows weaken, the spot market loses one of the clearest sources of marginal demand.

Lacie Zhang, a research analyst at Bitget Wallet, told CryptoSlate that higher yields have made institutional buyers more selective because government debt now offers a stronger return profile.

She said:

“Rising US Treasury yields are acting as a clear macro headwind for Bitcoin. As yields move higher, the relative appeal of government debt improves, raising the opportunity cost of holding a volatile, non-yielding asset like BTC.”

Moreover, the weaker ETF picture is being reinforced by on-chain spot-flow data.

CryptoQuant data show that Cumulative Volume Delta has deteriorated across major venues after stronger readings in March. According to the firm, monthly averages of $50 million on Binance and $30 million on Coinbase have slipped to about $6.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively.

The indicator also briefly turned negative on May 8, pointing to a weaker balance between buyers and sellers. That leaves Bitcoin trading around a major pivot zone, with thinner spot support than during the earlier phase of the rally.

Moreover, the macro backdrop has also become less supportive for risk assets. The unresolved conflict between Iran and the US has added uncertainty around growth and inflation, even after President Donald Trump initially suggested the conflict would last only a few weeks.

Bitcoin’s hedge case remains longer term

Despite this current market situation, the broader investment argument for Bitcoin has not disappeared.

Analysts at Bitunix told CryptoSlate that while the higher treasury yields can pressure BTC in the short term by draining liquidity and reducing speculative appetite, the same forces could strengthen the case for scarce, non-sovereign assets.

According to the firm, if investors are demanding greater compensation for US deficits, debt issuance, and inflation risk, Bitcoin’s fixed supply could continue to attract buyers looking for an asset outside the sovereign credit system.

However, that argument is more likely to influence long-term strategic allocation than short-term positioning.

For now, Bitcoin appears dependent on two catalysts: a retreat in Treasury yields or a recovery in ETF inflows strong enough to absorb the rate shock.

Without either, price action could remain boxed between support in the upper $70,000s and resistance near $82,000.

Stablecoins and tokenized Treasurys draw cautious capital

In light of the current rate environment, crypto traders are repositioning their capital in the market.

Nansen's Sondergaard said smart-money wallets have moved incrementally toward stablecoins over the past two weeks, showing a preference for flexibility over directional exposure.

This shift points to caution rather than a full exit from the market as the traders seek fresh market catalysts for their trades.

Moreover, the US tokenized Treasurys are also benefiting from the higher-rate backdrop.

Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder of RedStone, told CryptoSlate that the risk-free yields above 4% have become a direct competitor to non-yielding assets while strengthening demand for tokenized real-world assets.

Data from Token Terminal shows that tokenized US Treasurys have reached a record high of $15.35 billion in value, up from about $8.9 billion at the start of the year. This represents a 70% growth in under five months.

According to Kazmierczak, that growth shows capital is still moving through blockchain rails, but with a stronger preference for products tied to short-duration government debt. He added:

“BlackRock BUIDL, VanEck VBILL, Apollo ACRED, Hamilton Lane SCOPE, Franklin Templeton BENJI are all live in production today. Institutions get 4%+ yield with 24/7 settlement, programmable collateral, and composability with DeFi.”

This shift gives the current market cycle a different shape from earlier rate shocks.

Now, Bitcoin is absorbing pressure from a stronger bond market, while another corner of the crypto industry is expanding because that same bond market now offers yield worth tokenizing.

The post US Treasury yields surge to new highs as liquidity tightens, pushing Bitcoin back below $82,000 resistance appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Ethereum ($ETH) has found itself under intense selling pressure over the past few weeks. Despite several attempts by bulls to push the asset back into higher trading tiers, market dynamics have shifted drastically in favor of the bears.

Is Ethereum Crashing Below $2,000?

According to current technical structures on the chart and broader market indicators, there is a substantial risk that the Ethereum price could break below $2,000. The asset is currently facing strong overhead resistance and a lack of immediate buy walls. Market data confirms that whale distribution has accelerated, heavily impacting spot market liquidity.

While short-term relief bounces are always possible in derivatives-driven markets, the overarching multi-week trend highlights a series of lower highs and lower lows. If the current support zones fail to hold back the bears, a continuation toward the next major demand zone below $2,000 appears highly probable before the end of the second quarter.

Ethereum Price Analysis in May 2026

A detailed examination of the weekly ETH/USD chart reveals a distinct breakdown of the mid-term bullish structure.

The Moving Average Crossover and Bearish Sentiment

• The chart shows the 9-period and 21-period Moving Averages (MA Cross) tracking above the current price action. The 9-period MA sits at $2,204.3, while the 21-period MA hovers higher at $2,356.1.
• The fact that the current price is trading at $2,174.5—well below both short-term moving averages—proves that the immediate momentum is firmly controlled by sellers. A sustained position below these lines often transforms previous support areas into firm overhead supply walls.

Horizontal Support and Resistance Levels

Several key horizontal zones are mapped out on this weekly timeframe:

• The Overhead Ceilings: Strong resistance lines are established at $2,400, $2,600, and $3,200. These levels previously acted as consolidation floors before the major distribution phase began.
• The Current Battleground: The immediate line of defense for buyers is situated around the green support band between $2,161 and $2,180. The current weekly candle is testing the very bottom of this range, registering a net loss of over 8.29% for the current period.
• The Sub-$2,000 Floors: If the $2,161 floor crumbles, the chart reveals a massive liquidity void. The next structured support bands wait lower at the $1,800 green line and the ultimate macro support level of $1,600.

RSI Indicator Overview

At the bottom of the chart, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) with a 14-period setting is currently printing at 40.86, with its signal line at 37.66. While an RSI reading near 40 shows that the asset is approaching an oversold territory, it has not yet hit the traditional extreme oversold threshold of 30. This implies that there is still ample room for a downward extension before the market forces a structural, momentum-based trend reversal.

Why Is Ethereum Crashing?

Accelerated Whale Distribution and Exchange Inflows

Data from blockchain analytics platforms highlights a worrying trend for Ethereum bulls. Over the past two weeks, exchange reserves for ETH have risen dramatically. Hundreds of thousands of ETH have been transferred onto centralized trading venues, heavily noting an intent to liquidate assets.

This distribution is primarily led by large-scale institutional wallets and "whales" holding between 10,000 and 100,000 ETH. When large entities transfer their holdings onto exchanges, it floods the order books with supply that retail buyers struggle to absorb.

Declining Institutional Inflows

The institutional narrative that pushed Ethereum upward throughout the previous quarters has cooled down. Net outflows from US spot $Ethereum ETFs have added pressure onto the market, dampening overall spot demand. Concurrently, major treasury firms have reported lower staking rewards and decreased yield revenue due to compressed network valuations, pushing institutional players to adjust their portfolios for maximum capital flexibility rather than long-term holding.

What Can Save the Bulls?

To invalidate this highly bearish scenario, Ethereum buyers need to step up immediately and force a daily close back above the 9-period moving average at $2,204. Reclaiming this minor level would signal that local demand is active. However, a full macro trend invalidation requires a strong push past the $2,335–$2,400 resistance cluster. Only a weekly close above $2,400 would reliably turn the structural bias back to neutral or bullish.

As macro asset trends undergo these aggressive distribution phases, securing digital assets off centralized exchanges becomes highly recommended. Utilizing cold storage options, which can be explored in detail through our hardware wallets comparison, guarantees that market volatility won't affect asset custody.

Crypto taxes are easy to ignore until your transaction history spans five exchanges, three wallets, a staking account, and a few DeFi experiments. This CoinTracking review looks at how the platform helps crypto users organize transaction data, calculate gains, and prepare tax reports without losing track of the bigger portfolio picture.

Key Takeaways

• CoinTracking is a long-running crypto tax software and portfolio tracker founded in 2012, now used by more than 2 million crypto users.
• CoinTracking supports over 300 exchanges and wallets for seamless imports, and over 400 exchanges and wallets through API, CSV, and manual workflows.
• Its crypto tax calculator can generate tax reports for many jurisdictions, with accounting methods such as FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, and ACB.
• The platform is powerful, but the interface can feel old-school compared with newer mobile-first tax software.
• CoinTracking offers DIY tax report generation plus full service support for users who need professional assistance with complex crypto transactions.

What Is CoinTracking? (2026 Overview)

CoinTracking is a Munich-based crypto portfolio tracker and crypto tax software launched in 2012, making it one of the first dedicated crypto tax tools on the market. According to CoinTracking’s own company data, it serves roughly 2.2 million active individual users, more than 25,000 corporate clients, and tracks over $41.5 billion in crypto portfolio value.

• CoinTracking is built to import trading data, wallet activity, and historical data from crypto exchanges, wallets, and blockchain addresses.
• The platform calculates realized and unrealized gains, income, fees, and taxable disposals across an entire crypto portfolio.
• Users can generate tax reports for multiple countries and share tax forms with accountants or tax authorities.
• Typical users include casual investors, crypto traders, DeFi users, NFT collectors, miners, businesses, and tax firms.
• CoinTracking operates with read-only permissions to enhance user security by not managing or holding private keys.
• It is not an exchange or wallet. CoinTracking does not hold funds, execute trades, or manage private keys; it is a tracking, analytics, and tax calculator platform.

CoinTracking Features At a Glance

CoinTracking’s key features are strongest for people who need more than a basic portfolio balance. It combines crypto management, portfolio management, tax calculations, and reporting into one detailed dashboard.

At a high level, CoinTracking includes:

• Multi-exchange exchange imports from Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, and many other crypto exchanges.
• API synchronization, csv files, import files, and manual entry for importing transactions.
• Portfolio analytics covering total account value, asset allocation, coin charts, trade statistics, and historical balances.
• A crypto tax calculator with 10+ accounting methods, including FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, AVCO, and ACB.
• Country specific tax reports, generic gain/loss summaries, and exports for outside tax software.
• Support for crypto assets including cryptocurrencies, tokens, stablecoins, and NFTs.
• Tools for tax firms, including multi-client dashboards and permissioned accounts.

-> Looking for the best crypto tax solution? Compare CoinTracking with other leading platforms in our full Top Crypto Tax Tools comparison and find the right tool for your needs.

CoinTracking can track over 27,500 digital assets and supports a wide range of transaction types, including trades, staking, and airdrops, which is essential for comprehensive portfolio management. The platform also offers interactive financial reports and analytics, including over 25 customizable analysis views.

Portfolio Tracking & Crypto Trading Analytics

CoinTracking started as a leading crypto portfolio tracker before crypto tax reporting became a mainstream need. That heritage still shows in its analytics. The platform helps investors aggregate transactions, analyze market trends, and generate regulatory tax documentation from one place.

CoinTracking supports seamless integration with over 300 exchanges and wallets, allowing users to effortlessly import their transaction history. CoinTracking supports integration with over 400 exchanges and wallets, allowing users to import their transaction history automatically via API or manually through CSV uploads.

This makes it useful if your crypto holdings are spread across centralized exchanges, hardware wallets, DeFi protocols, and older accounts you barely remember opening.

Importing Trades and Wallet Data

CoinTracking supports three main import methods:

1. API synchronization
2. CSV/XLS uploads
3. Manual transaction entry

The platform allows users to import data from exchanges using various methods, including API synchronization, CSV uploads, and manual entry, making it versatile for different user needs.

For active traders, the api import workflow is the cleanest option. You create a read-only api key on the exchange, connect it to CoinTracking, and let the system pull transaction details automatically. This api feature is helpful for frequent crypto trading because it reduces manual work.

For older platforms or closed accounts, CSV uploads are often more practical. Users can export transaction history from 2015, 2018, or any other available period, then upload the file for parsing. If exchange data is incomplete, users may need to manually add deposits, withdrawals, transfers, or sales price records.

Blockchain imports are also available for several networks, helping users pull on-chain transfers, swaps, liquidity pool activity, staking, and NFT activity. The platform supports advanced features for tracking decentralized finance (DeFi) activities, including liquidity pools, staking, and NFT transactions.

Make sure every api key is read-only, with no withdrawal or trading rights.

-> Want a closer look at CoinTracking? Read our full CoinTracking review to explore its features, pricing, and who it’s best for.

Portfolio Views, Charts, and Trade Statistics

CoinTracking’s dashboard shows total crypto portfolio value in fiat currencies such as USD, EUR, and GBP, as well as BTC. It can also display historical balance curves from your first import date onward.

Investors can utilize trade statistics provided by CoinTracking to analyze their realized and unrealized gains or losses. CoinTracking provides users with interactive charts and graphs that help visualize trade history, portfolio composition, and performance over time, aiding in decision-making.

Useful analytics include:

• Realized and unrealized gains by asset
• Gain/loss by exchange and time period
• Daily account value changes
• Profit by trade type, including spot, futures, and margin
• Allocation by coin, wallet, and exchange
• Open positions and cost basis
• Warnings for missing transactions and duplicate transactions

These tools are especially helpful if you want to review a specific tax year, compare the 2020–2023 cycle, or evaluate whether tax loss harvesting could reduce a future tax bill.

Crypto Tax Calculator & Reporting (Crypto Taxes)

CoinTracking is widely used as a crypto tax calculator for filing crypto taxes across multiple tax years. Crypto assets can be taxed as personal income, property, business income, capital gains, and often a mixture of these categories, making tax reporting complex.

Utilizing crypto tax software is crucial for ensuring accuracy and compliance with tax laws, as it automates the tracking and calculation of gains, losses, and taxable events.

The software features a smart categorization engine to automatically classify various on-chain actions, such as airdrops, mining rewards, and token swaps. This helps separate taxable events from non-taxable transfers, which is critical if you want to pay taxes accurately without over-reporting.

Supported Countries and Localized Crypto Tax Rules

CoinTracking provides tax reports tailored to major jurisdictions, including the USA, UK, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, France, Spain, and others. It also offers a general tax reporting function for users outside the most detailed country templates.

Many countries have specific tax reporting requirements for cryptocurrencies, and tax software can generate reports tailored to these requirements, simplifying the filing process.

For the US, CoinTracking can help users prepare data for irs form 8949 and Schedule D, with exports for TurboTax and TaxACT. You can compare this with official IRS digital assets guidance when reviewing your obligations.

For the UK, reports can support HMRC-style crypto asset calculations, including pooled cost basis where relevant. HMRC’s cryptoassets manual is still worth reviewing with a tax professional.

For users outside the main supported jurisdictions, CoinTracking can still generate gain/loss, income, and transaction summaries that an accountant can adapt to local tax returns.

From Raw Data to Final Crypto Tax Report

A typical CoinTracking workflow looks like this:

1. Import all wallets and exchanges for the relevant tax year.
2. Reconcile deposits, withdrawals, missing transfers, and duplicate entries.
3. Categorize staking rewards, airdrops, mining, gifts, spending, and DeFi activity.
4. Choose an accounting method such as FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, or ACB.
5. Run the crypto tax calculator.
6. Export comprehensive tax reports as PDF, CSV, Excel, or compatible tax software files.

CoinTracking supports over 10 different accounting methods for tax reporting, such as FIFO, HIFO, and ACB, tailored to various jurisdictions.

The tool separates taxable disposals, such as sales, trades, crypto-to-crypto swaps, crypto-to-fiat exits, and spending, from non-taxable wallet transfers. Advanced users can also compare methods before finalizing tax report generation, although you should confirm which method is accepted under your local tax laws.

-> Before choosing CoinTracking, explore our Top Crypto Tax Tools comparison page to see how it stacks up against other crypto tax platforms.

CoinTracking Full Service & Professional Support

Some users do not want to clean up thousands of crypto transactions by themselves. That is where CoinTracking’s full service option becomes relevant.

Full service is a premium workflow where specialists help import, reconcile, categorize, and prepare reports. Depending on the case, this may involve a tax professional, data specialist, or full service team familiar with exchange exports, wallet movements, DeFi, NFTs, and historical reconstruction.

CoinTracking also supports tax firms with multi-client dashboards, role-based access, standardized reporting, and workflows for bulk client management.

When Does Full Service Make Sense?

Full service makes the most sense when the cost of mistakes is higher than the cost of help.

It is especially useful for:

• High-frequency crypto traders
• NFT flippers
• Yield farmers and liquidity providers
• Miners with years of rewards
• Businesses accepting crypto payments
• Users with 10,000+ transactions
• People fixing old tax years from 2017–2024
• Investors with missing data from closed exchanges

If you only have a few hundred trades, the free version or a lower paid plan may be enough. But if your records are messy, full service can save time and reduce the risk of sending inaccurate reports to tax authorities.

How CoinTracking Full Service Typically Works

The process usually starts with an initial consultation. You provide exchange access through read-only API keys, CSV exports, wallet addresses, and any relevant historical files.

The specialists then:

• Import transaction data
• Reconcile transfers between wallets
• Correct missing transactions
• Review duplicate transactions
• Categorize staking, mining, airdrops, forks, NFT sales, and token swaps
• Run the crypto tax calculator
• Prepare draft reports for review

Final outputs can be shared with your accountant or used as filing support, depending on your jurisdiction. Even with professional assistance, you remain responsible for final filing decisions and should understand the basics of your report.

Security, Privacy, and Data Protection

CoinTracking handles sensitive financial records, so security matters.

CoinTracking prioritizes the security and privacy of user data, ensuring that all servers are located within the European Union, which makes sensitive user data GDPR compliant. CoinTracking is ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certified, which involves independent auditing of all processes, reports, encryption methods, and support/management processes to ensure high security standards.

Users have the option to register with CoinTracking completely anonymously, although this limits their ability to recover passwords and access certain features. This anonymous registration option is unusual among crypto tax reporting software platforms.

CoinTracking employs encryption techniques to protect user data, including personal data and transaction details, enhancing the platform’s security against unauthorized access.

Other security features include:

• SSL/TLS encrypted connections
• Encrypted API credentials
• Read-only API requirements
• Two-factor authentication
• EU-based hosting
• Data deletion controls

The platform allows users to create backups of their data, which can be restored at any time, providing an additional layer of security against data loss.

CoinTracking App & Mobile Experience

The cointracking app is available for iOS and Android and is mainly designed for portfolio monitoring rather than deep tax work.

The cointracking mobile app syncs with the web account and shows portfolio value, coin prices, simple charts, and basic performance views. Users can check crypto holdings, monitor price movement, and review balances while away from the desktop.

Useful mobile features include:

• Portfolio value tracking
• Day and night modes
• Widgets for quick balance checks
• Coin price alerts
• Basic transaction review and editing

However, complex reconciliation, importing transactions, and generate tax reports workflows are still better on desktop. The app is convenient, but CoinTracking’s strongest tax reporting software features live in the web interface.

Pricing Plans and Limits

CoinTracking’s pricing plans are based mainly on transaction limits and advanced functionality. Always check the current CoinTracking pricing page before buying, as prices and promotions can change.

The free plan gives users a free account with basic functionality and portfolio tracking for up to 200 transactions. CoinTracking offers a free plan that allows users to manage up to 200 transactions, providing access to basic features and portfolio tracking. However, the free plan is limited for tax reports, so serious filers usually need a paid plan.

Common tiers include:

• Free: up to 200 transactions, basic portfolio view, limited tax reporting.
• Starter: low-volume users who need tax reports for a small transaction history.
• Pro: CoinTracking’s Pro plan supports up to 3,500 transactions and is priced at approximately $159 per year, making it suitable for most casual traders.
• Expert: higher transaction limits, more backups, advanced reports, and priority help.
• Unlimited: unlimited transactions, premium support, full reporting capabilities, and features for heavy traders or businesses.

CoinTracking’s pricing structure includes options for 1-year, 2-year, or lifetime plans, with longer subscriptions resulting in lower monthly costs. Some plans may also include crypto-payment discounts or seasonal tax promotions.

Before upgrading, check whether all historical transactions count toward your plan limit. A user with five active tax years can hit limits faster than expected.

CoinTracking Pros

CoinTracking has several clear strengths as a crypto tax calculator and portfolio platform:

• Broad integrations: cointracking supports hundreds of exchanges, wallets, and blockchains through API, CSV, and manual entry.
• Large asset coverage: the platform allows users to track over 27,500 digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, tokens, and NFTs, providing a comprehensive view of their portfolio.
• Strong tax engine: users can create tax reports, income reports, capital gains summaries, and exports for accountants.
• Advanced analytics: interactive charts, coin charts, trade statistics, and over 25 customizable analysis views help users understand performance.
• DeFi and NFT support: the platform can classify staking, liquidity pools, airdrops, mining, token swaps, and NFT transactions.
• Security posture: ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certification, EU servers, encryption, read-only API keys, backups, 2FA, and anonymous registration.
• Professional workflows: full service support and tax firms features make CoinTracking scalable beyond individual investors.

CoinTracking Cons

No crypto tax software is perfect, and CoinTracking has trade-offs.

The biggest drawback is usability. The interface is powerful but dense, with many menus, tables, and settings. Beginners who expect a modern mobile-first experience may find the platform overwhelming.

Other limitations include:

• Pricing can feel confusing because transaction limits, renewals, and add-ons require careful reading.
• Lower plans can be restrictive if you trade often or use DeFi.
• Support may slow down during peak tax season.
• Obscure DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and legacy exchanges may still require manual fixes.
• Small buy-and-hold investors may find the feature set more than they need.

If your activity is simple, test the free version first before committing to an annual plan.

Who Is CoinTracking Best For?

CoinTracking is best for users who need precision, history, and reporting depth.

It is a strong fit for:

• People trading across multiple exchanges
• Users reconstructing 2013–2025 trading histories
• DeFi users with staking, liquidity pools, bridges, or airdrops
• NFT collectors and sellers
• Miners and businesses receiving crypto
• Crypto traders with more than a few hundred yearly transactions
• Accountants and tax firms managing multiple clients
• Investors who want audit-ready reports and detailed transaction history

Long-term HODLers with only a few purchases may not need the full feature set. They can start with the free plan or compare lighter tools before upgrading.

Conclusion: Our CoinTracking Review for Crypto Tax Reporting

CoinTracking remains one of the most mature crypto tax and portfolio platforms available in 2026. Its strengths are depth, history, integrations, tax calculations, and flexible reporting.

The main downsides are the dated interface, learning curve, and pricing complexity. Still, for serious traders, DeFi users, businesses, and tax professionals, CoinTracking is one of the strongest options for organizing crypto transactions and preparing tax reports.

If your crypto activity is complex, test the free account, import a sample of your data, and see whether the reports match your needs. Then review the output with a qualified tax advisor before filing, because crypto tax law continues to evolve quickly.

-> Curious if CoinTracking is the right crypto tax tool for you? Check out our full CoinTracking review for a clear breakdown.

FAQ – CoinTracking, Crypto Taxes, and Practical Use

Does CoinTracking connect directly to my exchanges and wallets via API key?

Yes. CoinTracking supports read-only api key connections to many major exchanges, including Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and others. You create restricted API keys with no withdrawal or trading permissions, then paste them into CoinTracking’s import area.

If an exchange does not support API imports, you can usually upload CSV files or enter transactions manually.

Can I use CoinTracking to fix old crypto tax years like 2017 or 2018?

Yes. CoinTracking is well suited for reconstructing older trading history if you still have exchange exports, wallet records, blockchain addresses, or partial documentation.

You can import old records, run the tax calculator for each tax year, and produce backdated tax reports for your accountant or tax authority. If the data is very incomplete, the full service team or a local tax professional may be needed.

Is CoinTracking enough on its own to file my crypto taxes?

CoinTracking can generate detailed gain/loss, income, and transaction reports, but it is not a legal advisor or tax authority.

In many countries, users can take CoinTracking reports into tax software or send them to an accountant. For high-value portfolios, DeFi, NFTs, business activity, or unclear tax laws, professional review is strongly recommended.

How accurate are CoinTracking’s reports for DeFi and NFTs?

CoinTracking supports many DeFi and NFT transaction types, including swaps, staking, liquidity pool activity, airdrops, and NFT trades.

Accuracy still depends on clean imports and correct categorization. Experimental protocols, unusual bridges, or incomplete wallet data may require manual edits before final tax report generation.

What happens if a transaction is missing or mismatched in CoinTracking?

CoinTracking includes tools to detect missing transactions, duplicate transactions, unmatched transfers, and inconsistent balances.

You can manually add or edit transaction details, re-run exchange imports, upload new import files, or contact support. Clean data is essential before you generate tax reports, because small errors can change your capital gains, income totals, or final tax bill.

The total market capitalization faces a hefty correction amid shifting macroeconomic factors and unfolding regulatory changes in the United States. While several altcoins attempted a temporary breakout over the last 24 hours, the dominant sentiment across trading desks has flipped firmly back to caution.

Major Assets Break Critical Support

The entire digital asset landscape has turned red following a failed bullish push. For traders tracking real-time asset changes, the core metrics paint a clear picture of localized panic:

• Bitcoin ($BTC): Slipped below the psychological threshold of $80,000, now actively fighting to protect a foundational floor at $78,000.
• Ethereum ($ETH): Traded down sharply, landing at $2,170.
• Binance Coin ($BNB): Declined alongside the broader market to settle at $655.
• $XRP: Retreating from its recent high velocity to rest near $1.40.

What Caused the Crypto Crash?

A crypto market correction on this scale is rarely caused by a single isolated technical indicator. In this case, a confluence of institutional profit-taking and macroeconomic headwinds triggered the unwinding of leveraged long positions. High-level data published by Bloomberg Finance indicates that a hotter-than-expected US Producer Price Index (PPI) report has reignited fears of persistent inflation, driving institutional capital away from high-risk environments and toward stablecoin structures.

Furthermore, temporary policy gridlock regarding crucial financial commission appointments in Washington has left market participants guessing about the timeline for structural regulatory clarity, adding an extra layer of structural risk to spot trading pairs.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The $78,000 Support is the Line in the Sand

The immediate trajectory of the entire digital finance economy hinges tightly on the technical behavior of the Bitcoin price.

The Bearish Breakdown Scenario

If the aggregate selling volume pushes the daily close cleanly under the $78,000 support band, it will break a multi-week ascending structure. According to order book depth across global platforms highlighted in our crypto exchange comparison, a breakdown here will likely clear the path for an aggressive correction toward deeper liquidity pools situated between $72,000 and $74,000.

The Bullish Fakeout Scenario

Conversely, technical analysts note that this aggressive dip could easily turn into a classic institutional sweep. If whale wallets exploit the retail panic to absorb spot supply at these numbers, the entire drop could conclude as a "fakeout." A swift hourly close back above $80,000 would invalidate the immediate bearish trend, trapping over-leveraged short positions and accelerating a short-squeeze back up toward previous highs.

Crypto Price Analysis Today

Jerome Powell has officially resigned as Chairman of the Federal Reserve today, May 15, 2026. His departure ends years of restrictive monetary policy that often weighed heavily on risk assets. Stepping into the role tomorrow is Kevin Warsh, making history as the first Federal Reserve Chair to hold an openly "pro-crypto" stance. This leadership flip is being viewed by institutional investors as a massive green light for the digital asset industry.

Why Powell’s Resignation Matters

The resignation of Jerome Powell is the primary catalyst for the current market shift. Powell’s tenure was defined by a battle against inflation and a traditionalist view of the dollar. By stepping down, he makes room for a successor who understands the mechanics of decentralized finance (DeFi) and the role of Bitcoin in a modern portfolio.

Kevin Warsh: The First Pro-Crypto Chair

Kevin Warsh is not your typical central banker. As a former member of the Board of Governors and an advisor to major investment firms, Warsh has long advocated for private-sector innovation over government-controlled digital currencies.

• Pro-Innovation: Warsh has expressed a preference for stablecoins and decentralized assets over a Federal Reserve-issued CBDC.
• Bitcoin Advocacy: In past interviews with CNBC, Warsh has compared Bitcoin to "digital gold," suggesting it serves as a crucial hedge against fiscal mismanagement.
• Market Liquidity: Analysts expect Warsh to be more sensitive to market liquidity needs, which is historically bullish for the crypto news cycle and asset prices.

A Massive Bullish Flip for Crypto

The transition is already being felt across the markets. Experts suggest that a Warsh-led Fed could lead to:

• Regulatory Clarity: A shift away from "regulation by enforcement."
• Increased Institutional Adoption: Large banks may feel more comfortable offering crypto services with a sympathetic Chair at the helm.
• Favorable Interest Rate Environment: Speculation of a "dovish" tilt could weaken the dollar and send Bitcoin to new all-time highs.

Bitcoin Loses Key Support Amid Global Market Rout

The financial world is reeling today as Bitcoin ($BTC) fell below the critical $80,000 psychological support level. This move comes on the heels of a brutal opening session for Wall Street, where roughly $700 billion in market capitalization evaporated within minutes of the opening bell. The contagion has not been limited to risk assets; the precious metals market is witnessing an unprecedented exodus, with an estimated $1.5 trillion wiped from Gold and Silver valuations over the last 24 hours.

Why is Bitcoin Crashing Today?

The primary catalyst for the Bitcoin price drop appears to be a massive de-risking event triggered by "hotter-than-expected" inflation data. The latest Producer Price Index (PPI) surged to 6% year-over-year, far exceeding the 4.9% forecasts. This has effectively killed any remaining hopes for a Federal Reserve rate cut in 2026, forcing investors to flee high-beta assets like cryptocurrencies and tech stocks.

Global Liquidation: Stocks and Metals in Freefall

The carnage started in the traditional sector. The Nasdaq-100 fell 1.7% at the open, led by a bloodbath in semiconductor stocks like Intel and NVIDIA. Simultaneously, Gold—usually a safe haven—tumbled below $4,350 per ounce.

• US Stocks: $700 Billion wiped at the open.
• Precious Metals: $1.5 Trillion exit from Gold and Silver.
• Crypto Market: Total market cap down 0.29% in hours, with liquidations crossing $200 million.

Current Market Prices (Live Feed)

• Bitcoin (BTC): $79,066 (-1.5%)
• Ethereum (ETH): $2,215 (-3.2%)
• Gold (XAU): $4,550 (-2.1%)

The micronation honored Vitalik Buterin during ETH Prague 2026 as it continued promoting blockchain-based governance and digital citizenship.

From Cydia to ChatGPT, jailbreaking went from cracking iPhones to liberating LLMs. Here's how it works, who's doing it, and why every AI lab is losing sleep.

Rapper Drake released three new albums on Friday, and described himself on one as “a BTC crypto big-timer.”

The Bitcoin DeFi protocol is moving its assets away from LayerZero following the Kelp DAO exploit that led to the loss of $292 million.

Decentralized exchange Hyperliquid has become a popular destination for speculating on oil prices.

Hyperliquid recently delivered one of the strongest moves in the crypto market, but now it may be losing momentum.

Ethereum ETFs have recorded the highest weekly outflow seen since January as all the days of the week saw steady withdrawals. No new capital was received during the week.

Ripple's Schwartz joins XRP Ledger Foundation; XRP secures a massive milestone; Cardano founder Hoskinson calls Clarity Act section removal insanity.

XRP has just achieved the biggest weekly inflow of the year after seeing a large intake of fresh capital on nearly all days of the week.

Ripple has completed a total burn of 32,075,051 RLUSD tokens on the Ethereum blockchain, over the last 24 hours, potentially boosting its demand in the market.

TLDR:

• • Nebius Q1 2026 revenue hit $399M, up 684% year-over-year, with AI revenue representing 98% of total sales.
  • Token Factory offers up to 26x cost savings over frontier APIs, with 99.9% uptime and SOC 2 Type II security.
  • Three Q1 acquisitions — Tavily, Eigen AI, and Clarifai — complete Nebius’s full agentic AI deployment stack.
  • Contracted power capacity surpassed 3.5 gigawatts in Q1, with new guidance targeting 4 gigawatts by year-end.

Nebius recorded $399 million in revenue during Q1 2026, reflecting a 684% year-over-year increase. The company’s AI-specific revenue reached $390 million, growing 841% and representing 98% of total revenue.

Full-year revenue guidance was raised to $3.0–3.4 billion, with ARR guidance set at $7–9 billion. These figures have drawn renewed attention to Nebius’s positioning within the open-source AI infrastructure market.

Token Factory Addresses a Gap in Open-Source AI Deployment

Nebius CEO Roman Chernin outlined during the Q1 2026 earnings call why open-source model deployment remains a persistent challenge.

According to Chernin, proprietary models like those from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Gemini work seamlessly through API calls.

However, deploying open-source alternatives such as DeepSeek, Llama, or Qwen at production scale often fails to meet reliability and cost expectations.

Token Factory is Nebius’s answer to that problem. The platform combines fine-tuning, optimization, orchestration, and deployment into one governed system.

It offers sub-second latency, autoscaling throughput, 99.9% uptime, and SOC 2 Type II security. Early adopters have reported cost reductions of up to 26x compared to frontier proprietary models at equivalent quality.

As Milk Road AI noted on X, Chernin argued that downloading weights from Hugging Face and pairing them with open-source inference engines simply does not work reliably at scale, particularly when economics and uptime are both required. Token Factory was purpose-built to close that gap for enterprise-grade workloads.

Adjusted EBITDA margins in the AI cloud segment nearly doubled quarter-on-quarter, reaching 45%. That combination of triple-digit growth and expanding margins is rare for any company at this stage of development.

Three Acquisitions Expand the Token Factory Stack

During Q1, Nebius completed three strategic acquisitions targeting different layers of its platform. Tavily adds agentic web search and retrieval capabilities to the stack.

Eigen AI, acquired for $643 million, brings advanced model optimization. Clarifai contributes production-grade inference for multimodal and computer vision workloads.

Together, these additions transform Token Factory from an inference platform into a full agentic AI deployment stack.

The pipeline now spans raw model weights through to finished production AI products, all within Nebius’s owned infrastructure. That vertical integration distinguishes the company from GPU rental providers competing on hardware access alone.

On the infrastructure side, contracted power capacity now exceeds 3.5 gigawatts. Nebius hit its full-year power target in Q1 alone and subsequently raised guidance to 4 gigawatts by year-end.

A new 1.2 gigawatt Pennsylvania AI factory brings total owned sites above 100 megawatts to seven across two continents.

That scale of power infrastructure, secured ahead of broader market demand, forms the foundation beneath the Token Factory strategy and positions Nebius within the open-source AI economy for years ahead.

The post Nebius Q1 2026 Revenue Jumps 684% as Token Factory Targets Open-Source AI Deployment Gap appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• CFTC Chairman Michael Selig has been the agency’s only commissioner since December, with four seats still vacant.
• House Agriculture leaders argue a full five-member CFTC commission produces more durable and legally sound rules.
• The Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act 15-9, expanding CFTC authority over spot digital commodity trading.
• Sen. Klobuchar proposed blocking new CFTC rules from taking effect until at least four commissioners are confirmed and seated.

House Agriculture Committee leaders are pressing President Trump to nominate four CFTC commissioners as crypto legislation advances on Capitol Hill.

Chairman Glenn Thompson and Ranking Member Angie Craig sent a joint letter Friday calling for a full five-member commission.

Their request comes amid a growing regulatory workload and the Senate Banking Committee’s recent advancement of the CLARITY Act with a 15-9 bipartisan vote.

House Leaders Push for Full CFTC Commission Amid Expanding Crypto Mandate

The joint letter from Thompson and Craig pointed directly to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig’s April 16 testimony. Selig outlined an aggressive rulemaking agenda before the committee, covering derivatives markets and digital assets.

However, he has served as the agency’s sole commissioner since December, with four seats remaining empty after a wave of departures.

Thompson and Craig stated in their letter that the public, markets, and the agency itself will be “best served by a full five-member commission,” adding it would deliver “better regulations, more durable rules, and more sensitivity to the divergent views of key derivatives market stakeholders.”

The pair also tied the nomination request to Trump’s budget proposal, which seeks increased CFTC funding. Currently, the agency operates with roughly 543 full-time staff, compared to approximately 4,200 at the SEC.

The letter further noted that filling all seats would complement the administration’s funding request. A bipartisan commission would pair financial resources with balanced leadership.

That combination, the lawmakers argued, would position the CFTC more effectively as the leading derivatives markets regulator globally.

Legal durability also factored into the committee’s argument. Rules established by a sole commissioner may face greater vulnerability in court.

With a string of state-level prediction market suits pending and new rulemakings on the horizon, the letter noted that a full five-member commission can write “more durable rules.” That stronger legal footing would matter as the agency defends its decisions going forward.

CLARITY Act Advances as CFTC Seat Debate Grows

The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 on Thursday to advance the CLARITY Act, the crypto market structure bill.

Two Democrats crossed the aisle to support the legislation alongside Republicans. The House had already passed its version of the bill last July with a strong 294-vote majority.

The CLARITY Act would grant the CFTC sweeping new authority over spot digital commodity trading. That expanded mandate would trigger a significant rulemaking process, adding further weight to the call for a fully staffed commission.

Thompson and Craig acknowledged in their letter that the legislation “would require a significant rulemaking process,” reinforcing why more commissioners are needed now.

Bloomberg reported in January that the White House was reviewing a bipartisan slate of potential nominees. Names under consideration included Optiver lobbyist Matt MacKenzie, Jump Trading’s Ari Officer, and Senate Agriculture Committee counsel Nathan Anonick. Trump has not formally nominated anyone beyond Selig.

Meanwhile, Sen. Amy Klobuchar has proposed an amendment to the Senate Agriculture Committee’s version of the bill. Her proposal would block new CFTC rules from taking effect until at least four commissioners are seated.

That move reflects broader Democratic interest in ensuring the agency has adequate leadership before major rulemaking begins.

The post House Agriculture Leaders Urge Trump to Nominate Full CFTC Commission as CLARITY Act Moves Forward appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Only 10 stocks contributed 69% of the S&P 500’s 16% rally, leaving 490 companies largely behind.
• Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon pledged a combined $570B+ in AI spending, fueling the tech surge.
• The equal-weight S&P 500 gained just 7–8%, less than half the performance of the standard index.
• Goldman Sachs warned that market breadth has dropped to its narrowest level since the dot-com bubble.

The S&P 500 rally has gained nearly 16% since March 30, but market analysts are raising concerns about how few stocks are driving the move.

Just 10 companies contributed 69% of the entire index gain. The rest of the 490 companies in the index contributed only 31%.

This split between megacap performance and the broader market has drawn comparisons to conditions last seen during the dot-com bubble era.

AI Spending Surge Fuels Semiconductor Melt-Up

The rally began after reports that Iran was open to ending hostilities with the United States. Oil prices fell sharply from above $100, triggering short covering across markets. From there, strong earnings reports from major tech companies took over as the primary driver.

Several of the largest technology firms then raised their capital expenditure forecasts to historic levels. Microsoft projected AI-related spending of around $190 billion.

Alphabet guided toward $180–190 billion, while Amazon held firm at roughly $200 billion. Meta is expected to spend as much as $145 billion on AI infrastructure.

These projections pushed semiconductor stocks into a sharp upward move. Intel rose more than 240% this year. SanDisk surged over 550%. Micron doubled as AI memory demand left customers receiving only 50–67% of the chips they ordered.

As Bull Theory noted on X, “Almost every major tech company raised AI spending projections to levels never seen before,” pointing to the scale of capital flowing into AI infrastructure as the central force behind the current market move.

Narrow Breadth Raises Questions About Rally Durability

Despite the index gains, the equal-weight S&P 500 only rose around 7–8% over the same period. This version of the index removes the outsized influence of megacap stocks. That figure is less than half the performance of the market-cap-weighted index.

Fewer than half of all S&P 500 stocks are currently trading above their 50-day moving average. Goldman Sachs has warned that market breadth has fallen to one of its narrowest levels since the dot-com era. These conditions suggest the broader market is not participating evenly in the recovery.

Alphabet alone contributed 15% of the total index rally. Nvidia added another 10%. Amazon, Broadcom, Intel, Micron, Apple, AMD, and Microsoft carried the bulk of the remaining gains.

The concern among analysts is straightforward. If AI capital spending slows, if the Iran ceasefire breaks down and oil spikes again, or if earnings miss even slightly, there is limited broad market support to cushion the fall.

The rally, as it stands, rests on a narrow foundation of AI-driven stocks and one of the most aggressive corporate spending cycles in recent memory.

The post Ten Stocks Are Holding the S&P 500 Together While the Rest of the Market Lags Behind appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Amazon, Microsoft, and Google invest billions in AI labs, then collect that money back as locked-in cloud revenue.

• Within 16 days, three megadeals handed Anthropic compute from Amazon, Google, and SpaceX simultaneously.

• xAI failed to operate independently and was forced to lease its GPU data center directly to rival Anthropic.

• Regulators in the US, EU, and UK are now probing whether these compute deals amount to backdoor monopolies.

Major AI labs — OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI — are often presented as fierce competitors racing to dominate artificial intelligence.

However, a closer look at recent financial deals tells a different story. All three companies rely on the same small group of cloud infrastructure providers: Microsoft, Amazon, and Google.

These tech giants invest billions into AI labs, then collect that money back as cloud revenue. The arrangement is raising serious antitrust concerns around the world.

The Deals That Changed the AI Landscape

Within just 16 days in April and May 2026, three major compute deals reshaped the AI industry. Amazon expanded its Anthropic commitment to $13 billion, tied to $100 billion in AWS cloud spend over ten years.

Google followed with up to $40 billion in equity plus five gigawatts of TPU capacity for Anthropic. Then SpaceX, which had absorbed xAI, handed Anthropic its entire Colossus 1 data center — over 220,000 Nvidia GPUs and 300 megawatts of power.

The financial structure behind these deals follows a repeating pattern. Tech giants invest in AI labs, then require those labs to spend the money back on their own cloud services.

Microsoft’s total OpenAI investment reportedly exceeds $100 billion when Azure infrastructure is counted. In return, OpenAI committed $250 billion in cloud spend back to Azure over a decade.

Amazon also invested $50 billion into OpenAI in February 2026, making it the only hyperscaler holding equity stakes in both Anthropic and OpenAI simultaneously.

As @coinbureau noted, “OpenAI and Anthropic are not rivals, they are financially bound tenants to the same hyperscaler landlords.”

The financial results of this arrangement became clear in Q1 2026. Alphabet reported $37.7 billion in other income, largely from unrealized gains on its Anthropic and SpaceX stakes.

Amazon reported $16.8 billion in non-operating income, also driven by its Anthropic stake. These are paper gains—not cash—and they could reverse if Anthropic’s next funding round prices lower.

When Independence Becomes Too Expensive

xAI’s story offers a cautionary example of operating outside this structure. Grok’s model utilization was reported at around 11%, far below the 40% achieved by competitors.

Unable to sustain infrastructure costs independently, xAI was absorbed by SpaceX, which then leased the Colossus 1 data center directly to Anthropic — the company xAI was built to compete against.

Meta stands apart as the only major frontier AI player operating without cloud dependency. The company is running $125 billion to $145 billion in capital expenditure for 2026, building its own data centers and holding no equity ties to a single cloud partner.

Regulators are now responding to this concentrated structure. The FTC is investigating Amazon and Microsoft’s deals as potential backdoor mergers. The EU is enforcing antitrust rules against exclusive cloud contracts.

The UK has flagged over 90 cross-pollinating partnerships among Big Tech companies. Even if the AI compute stack is broken apart, the same four companies — Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta — are positioned to remain dominant at the foundational layer.

The post The Compute Cartel: How Microsoft, Amazon, and Google Control Every Major AI Lab appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• BlackRock is reportedly in discussions to commit between $5 billion and $10 billion to the SpaceX IPO offering.
• SpaceX is targeting June 11 for IPO pricing and June 12 for its market debut on the Nasdaq exchange.
• The offering could raise around $75 billion, valuing SpaceX at approximately $1.75 trillion at listing.
• Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are serving as lead bookrunners on the deal.

BlackRock is reportedly in talks to invest up to $10 billion in SpaceX’s anticipated initial public offering. The asset management giant could commit between $5 billion and $10 billion to the offering, according to The Information.

This potential move marks one of the largest institutional bets on Elon Musk’s space and satellite company. SpaceX is targeting a mid-June market debut on the Nasdaq exchange under the ticker “SPCX.”

BlackRock’s Potential Role in the SpaceX IPO

The report from The Information cited people familiar with the discussions. BlackRock has not publicly confirmed its participation in the SpaceX IPO. However, the figures being discussed point to a serious institutional commitment to the deal.

Reuters reported Friday that SpaceX is targeting June 11 for pricing, citing “sources familiar with the matter.” The report also confirmed Nasdaq as the chosen exchange for the listing. That confirmation added further weight to the accelerating timeline surrounding the offering.

Such an investment would place BlackRock among the most prominent backers of the listing. A $10 billion stake in a $1.75 trillion valuation company would be a notable position for any asset manager. The discussions show growing confidence among large institutions in SpaceX’s long-term outlook.

SpaceX plans to publicly release its IPO prospectus as early as next week. A roadshow is expected to begin on June 4, ahead of a possible market debut on June 12. The timeline moved faster than originally planned after the SEC completed its filing review ahead of schedule.

SpaceX IPO Timeline and Market Expectations

SpaceX is aiming to raise around $75 billion through the offering. At that level, it would rank among the largest IPOs in market history. The company’s valuation is expected to reach approximately $1.75 trillion at listing.

The Information noted the potential BlackRock investment could represent “a major institutional bet” on the company.

People familiar with the matter indicated the commitment range sits between $5 billion and $10 billion. No official figures have been confirmed by either BlackRock or SpaceX.

Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are serving as lead bookrunners. These banks bring strong distribution networks that could support demand across institutional investors. Their involvement adds credibility to the scale of the transaction.

Nasdaq’s recently introduced fast-entry rules for large-cap listings may benefit SpaceX after it begins trading. Those rules could allow SpaceX to gain quicker inclusion in the Nasdaq-100 index.

As Reuters noted, the accelerated pace was “partly driven by a quicker-than-anticipated review” of SpaceX’s IPO filings by the SEC. Market watchers are now tracking every development as the June dates draw closer.

The post BlackRock in Talks to Invest Up to $10 Billion in SpaceX IPO Ahead of June Listing appeared first on Blockonomi.

A federal financial disclosure filed by Donald Trump on May 14 shows his portfolio purchased shares of MARA Holdings, Coinbase, and Strategy between January and March 2026.

Out of more than 3,600 transactions listed across 113 pages, those three were the only crypto-related names in the entire filing.

What the Filing Actually Shows

The document in question is an OGE Form 278-T, the type of periodic transaction report that senior government officials are required to file, with the MARA purchase appearing at line 1106, dated March 30, 2026, in the $15,001 to $50,000 range.

Normally, the form does not disclose exact dollar amounts for individual transactions, only brackets. Furthermore, the filing noted that the holdings are managed by a third-party financial institution, not by Trump directly, which matters when reading anything into the selections.

That caveat aside, the composition of the crypto slices is worth paying attention to. MARA Holdings is the largest publicly traded Bitcoin miner in the United States by market cap. Coinbase is the dominant US crypto exchange and one of the few crypto companies with a long trading history as a public company. Strategy holds more Bitcoin on its balance sheet than any other publicly traded firm.

These are not obscure picks, but rather, they are three of the most recognizable institutional proxies for Bitcoin exposure available on US exchanges.

The Trump family also bought shares in Nvidia, whose CEO Jensen Huang was part of the entourage that accompanied the president on his first visit to China since 2017. Records also show they put money in Microsoft, Oracle, and Boeing, spending between $1 million and $5 million on those stocks.

Trump-Linked Crypto Ventures Under Scrutiny

The US president’s financial ties to the crypto industry have been under scrutiny for some time now, with one of them, American Bitcoin, a mining company backed by his family members, reporting an $82 million net loss in Q1 2026 despite mining a record 817 BTC during that period.

CEO Mike Ho framed it as an accounting issue rather than an operational one.

Meanwhile, World Liberty Financial has had a rougher run. Its native WLFI token hit an all-time low late last month after a 16% single-day drop, with the asset trading around $0.05 at the time, well below its peak near $0.33.

The project has faced additional pressure from a lawsuit by Tron founder Justin Sun and a Wall Street Journal report linking one of its partners to individuals sanctioned by the US Treasury in connection with alleged fraud operations in Southeast Asia.

Further, yesterday, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren asked the SEC to investigate World Liberty, accusing it of misleading investors and/or violating securities laws when it recently borrowed $75 million using WLFI as collateral.

The post Trump Adds Coinbase and Bitcoin Stocks to Portfolio appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s recent recovery attempt appears to be losing momentum as the market once again received notable rejection below the $80K mark. The repeated inability to sustain gains above key thresholds suggests sellers remain dominant, increasing the likelihood of another corrective phase in the short term.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, BTC recently experienced a slight bullish pullback following its rebound from the $78K support zone. However, this recovery rally was ultimately rejected around the critical $80K resistance region, which also aligns with the descending 200-day moving average near the $82K mark. The confluence of these resistance levels reinforces their significance and highlights persistent bearish sentiment across the market.

The rejection from this area suggests buyers are still unable to reclaim higher ground, while sellers continue defending overhead supply aggressively. As long as Bitcoin remains capped below the $80K-$82K region, the probability of an expanded bearish retracement remains elevated. In this scenario, the first major downside target would be the highlighted demand zone around $75K-$76K. A deeper correction could eventually expose lower support levels.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The lower timeframe provides further confirmation of weakening momentum. Bitcoin recently broke below a key ascending trendline that had supported the latest recovery phase. More importantly, the subsequent pullback toward this broken trendline resulted in another rejection, effectively validating the initial bearish breakout.

This classic breakdown-and-retest structure often signals continuation in the breakout direction, suggesting sellers remain in control. If bearish pressure persists, Bitcoin may continue declining toward the first important order block around the $75K-$76K region. Failure to hold this support could accelerate selling activity and expose the broader demand zone around $70K-$71K, which previously served as a strong accumulation area.

Sentiment Analysis

The Coinbase Premium Gap measures the price difference between Bitcoin traded on Coinbase and other major exchanges, particularly Binance. Since Coinbase activity is heavily associated with US institutional and spot investors, this metric is commonly used to gauge demand from American participants. Positive values typically indicate stronger spot buying pressure, while negative readings often reflect weaker demand or increased selling activity.

Recently, the indicator has fallen below the neutral 0 line once again, creating a negative premium gap. This shift implies that demand from US-based investors is fading, while selling pressure or cautious positioning is increasing. Historically, sustained negative readings have often aligned with corrective phases or periods of weak momentum.

If the Coinbase Premium Gap remains below zero in the coming weeks, it could further reinforce the bearish technical structure already observed on the charts, increasing the likelihood of continued downside pressure toward lower support regions.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: What Does the Rejection at $80K Mean for BTC’s Future? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 on Thursday to move forward on the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure proposal that has been the subject of debate for a while now.

Nevertheless, just ahead of the vote, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) put out a series of tweets on X about illicit crypto flows hitting $154 billion in 2025, adding another dimension to what was already an intensely debated topic on the extent of regulation in digital assets.

Bank Advocates Lean on Crime Data

The timing of BPI’s thread drew attention because lawmakers were simultaneously debating amendments tied to stablecoin yield restrictions and enforcement standards inside the CLARITY Act markup session.

According to data from Chainalysis that the institute shared, in 2025, illicit crypto addresses received $154 billion. This was a 162% year-over-year increase, driven largely by a 694% jump in value received by sanctioned entities.

Furthermore, the on-chain money laundering ecosystem grew from $10 billion in 2020 to over $82 billion in 2025, with stablecoins, primarily Tether (USDT), now accounting for 84% of all illicit transaction volume, displacing Bitcoin as the preferred payment method for criminals.

In a separate piece, the BPI argued that banks have spent decades staffing tens of thousands of AML employees while crypto companies have been largely exempt.

It said that the GENIUS Act imposed some obligations on US stablecoin issuers, but did not cover foreign issuers operating stateside. Tether, incorporated in El Salvador, sits outside that net.

The piece also cited the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, whose crypto activity reportedly reached over $3 billion in 2025, representing roughly 50% of Iran’s total crypto ecosystem by Q4 of that year.

According to the BPI, unhosted wallets, cross-chain bridges, and mixers are “specifically designed to frustrate tracing and openly advertised as such.”

The stablecoin debate has become one of the most contentious parts of the CLARITY Act negotiations, with banking groups, including members of the American Bankers Association, spending weeks lobbying senators to tighten language restricting yield-bearing stablecoins.

As CryptoPotato reported earlier this week, banking groups sent Senate offices more than 8,000 letters ahead of the markup vote, while the crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto said its supporters had contacted lawmakers nearly 1.5 million times in support of the bill.

But despite more than 40 amendments proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and procedural disputes during the hearing, the legislation advanced with support from Democratic senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks.

The Counter-Argument

While the BPI is demanding stricter anti-money laundering laws and sanctions regulations to be applied to crypto the same way it has been done to the traditional banking sector, data shared by Binance Research on May 14, offered some pushback to its claims.

According to Binance, trapped illicit funds on-chain have grown every year because less is being successfully laundered, not more.

Their report showed that more exit points are being blocked by KYC and more balances are being frozen by stablecoin issuers. Even the largest mixers have been processing at most $10 million per day.

The post CLARITY Act Clears Committee, But Money Laundering Question Hovers Over Crypto appeared first on CryptoPotato.

It’s safe to say that the world’s largest altcoin has underperformed in recent weeks as each attempt for a breakout was stopped at $2,400, and the subsequent rejection has pushed it further south. What’s particularly worrying is that ETH dipped below the crucial $2,200 support after today’s drop, and its behavior against bitcoin is even more painful.

In fact, the ETH/BTC pair just dropped to a 10-month low at under 0.028. Recall that ETH traded at over 0.042 BTC in September last year, shortly after its all-time high against the greenback, but it has been mostly downhill since then. Popular analyst Ted Pillows said this decline occurred even as Tom Lee’s BitMine continues to spend millions of dollars each week to accumulate more tokens.

ETH/BTC has hit a new yearly low.

This is despite Tom Lee buying $200M+ in $ETH every week. pic.twitter.com/PpNyUcgACp

— Ted (@TedPillows) May 16, 2026

ETH to Exchanges

Ali Martinez cited data from CryptoQuant, which could result in even more price declines for the altcoin. He noted that over 500,000 ETH had been sent to trading venues in the past week alone. In terms of USD value, this substantial stash is worth over $1.1 billion. Such large transfers could intensify the immediate selling pressure as traders usually send tokens to exchanges if they want to cash out.

Martinez warned recently that the TD Sequential, a popular indicator used to showcase whether an asset has exhausted its move in either direction, had flashed a sell signal for ETH. He believes the altcoin could be on the verge of a more painful decline, and outlined a worst-case scenario of a dump below $1,100.

On The Plus Side…

On the opposite side stands Satoshi Flipper, another popular analyst, who recently said ETH could bounce from the lower boundary of the ascending triangle, diagonal support it’s currently testing on the 8-hour chart.

At the same time, Lookonchain outlined an Ethereum OG who has returned to the scene. The unknown investor had received over 11,000 tokens at prices of under $3.50 (yes) 10 years ago, sold some for more than $30 million last year, and has now started buying again.

The on-chain analytics company said they spent $4.3 million in USDC to buy 1,951 ETH at today’s prices of around $2,180.

The post ETH Hits Yearly Low Against BTC as Investors Flood Exchanges appeared first on CryptoPotato.

There has been a lot of talk about an impending XRP breakout lately as the asset has been stuck in a relatively tight range since the early February crash.

Although each attempt has been met with immediate selling pressure, analysts are still hopeful that the token will overcome its most crucial resistance levels soon and head toward new peaks.

The Levels XRP Has to Surpass

In May alone, the cross-border token has already initiated three consecutive attempts to escape the captivity of its own consolidation. Although it was stopped almost instantly after each try, the good news is that it managed to mark higher highs before the subsequent rejections.

On May 6, it went from under $1.40 to $1.45 before it dumped back down to its starting point. However, it kept grinding and soared past $1.50 last Sunday before the bears stepped up once again. It managed to remain above $1.42, and Thursday’s attempt pushed it north to a two-month high of $1.55 before it was halted once again.

According to popular analyst EGRAG CRYPTO, XRP needs to overcome two major resistance levels before it goes on a more profound and sustainable run. The first is the one that stopped it in May at $1.51. If it falls, the second is located at $1.82, a level not seen since late January.

If the bulls managed to push XRP decisively above those lines, it would solidify the asset’s transition into a bullish Wave 5 expansion within the Elliott Wave structure. The analyst added that the most challenging parts of Elliott Wave are “NEVER Wave 3 or Wave 5;” instead, they point to fake breakouts, deep retracements, emotional traps, and complex structures.

“But once the correction is identified correctly: Wave 3 and Wave 5 become the easiest and most powerful moves to capitalize on,” EGRAG concluded.

We Still Play Range

Crypto Tony also mentioned XRP’s range between $1,30 and $1.55, in which the asset has remained for the past three and a half months. The analyst said he can look for more exposure once the asset breaks out in either direction, but until then, he will keep playing this range.

Fellow analyst CW added that XRP has liquidated a lot of short positions on its way up on Thursday, while the size of longs is “not large.” This would provide a more sustainable price rally structure if high-leveraged positions remain low.

Almost short positions in $XRP have been liquidated.

In addition, the size of long positions is not large. Most high-leverage positions in the $XRP futures market have been liquidated. pic.twitter.com/3WFZA0xMN3

— CW (@CW8900) May 15, 2026

The post XRP’s Next Bullish Wave Depends on These Crucial Price Levels: Analyst appeared first on CryptoPotato.